Regional budget allocation and renewable energy development in Ukraine: Implications for public expenditure management
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.18
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #3, pp. 247–284
- 4 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Efficient regional public expenditure is critical for aligning decentralized economic development with renewable energy, energy security, and reconstruction priorities. This study aims to examine whether expenditure across selected regional budget programs is systematically associated with renewable energy development in Ukraine and whether these relationships remain robust across alternative temporal, distributional, and nonlinear specifications. The analysis uses a balanced panel of 25 Ukrainian regions for 2018–2021 and applies program-specific two-way fixed-effects models with CR2 standard errors, Benjamini–Hochberg adjustments, lagged and same-sample specifications, wild-cluster-bootstrap inference, presence–intensity decomposition, alternative transformations, winsorization, and formal quadratic tests. In the baseline capacity growth models, expenditure from local target funds (β = 0.9152, p = 0.0192) and electric transport measures (β = 0.1499, p = 0.0126) showed nominally positive associations, but neither survived multiplicity adjustment (q = 0.1054). Wild-cluster-bootstrap inference did not confirm these estimates, producing p-values of 0.4871 and 0.3597, respectively, while both programs were observed in only five region–year cases across two regions. No program coefficient was significant at the 5% level in the electricity production models; SME support produced the strongest negative estimate (β = −0.2152, p = 0.0580, q = 0.5995), whereas installed renewable capacity remained positively associated with production (β = 0.4108–0.4803, p = 0.0041–0.0220). Lagged, presence–intensity, transformed, winsorized, and nonlinear specifications provided no multiplicity-robust evidence, with formal U-test q-values no lower than 0.5789.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [Grant No. IZURZ1_224119]. The authors bear sole responsibility for the conclusions and results of the research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H72, Q42, Q48, R58
-
References39
-
Tables26
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Linear two-way fixed-effects estimates for annual growth in installed renewable energy capacity
- Table 2. Linear two-way fixed-effects estimates for renewable electricity production
- Table 3. One-year lagged TWFE estimates for renewable energy development
- Table 4. Comparison of CR2 and wild-cluster-bootstrap inference for the principal findings
- Table A1. Descriptive statistics
- Table A2. Zero observations and territorial coverage of regional expenditure programs
- Table A3. Pooled Spearman correlation matrix
- Table A4. Within-region Pearson correlation matrix
- Table A5. Multicollinearity diagnostics for pooled and two-way fixed-effects specifications
- Table A6. Territorial units included in the balanced panel
- Table B1. Detailed CR2 inference and model-fit statistics: Annual growth in installed renewable energy capacity
- Table B2. Detailed CR2 inference and model-fit statistics: Renewable electricity production
- Table B3. Stability of common control and year effects across the parsimonious models
- Table B4. Evidential status of the nominally significant or weakly significant program coefficients
- Table B5. Detailed one-year lagged estimates for annual growth in installed renewable energy capacity
- Table B6. Detailed one-year lagged estimates for renewable electricity production
- Table B7. Comparison of contemporaneous and one-year lagged program estimates
- Table B8. Stability of controls and year effects in the lagged specifications
- Table B9. Summary of wild-cluster-bootstrap inference by model family
- Table B10. Wild-cluster-bootstrap inference for program–expenditure coefficients
- Table B11. Same-sample comparison of contemporaneous and one-year-lagged program estimates for renewable electricity production, 2019–2021
- Table B12. Program-presence and positive-spending-intensity models for annual growth in installed renewable energy capacity
- Table B13. Program-presence and positive-spending-intensity models for renewable electricity production
- Table B14. IHS-transformation robustness estimates for regional program expenditure
- Table B15. Winsorized positive-spending robustness estimates
- Table B16. Formal quadratic and U-shape tests for regional program expenditure
-
- Badreddine, A., & Larbi Cherif, H. (2024). Public health improvement by reducing air pollution: A strategy for the transition to renewable energy. Health Economics and Management Review, 5(1), 1-14.
- Bappayo, A., & Adamu, D. A. (2025). The role of public radio broadcasting in the sustainable development of rural areas in Bauchi State, Nigeria. Green Transition and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 17-23.
- Belgibayeva, A., Artyukhov, A., Kubičková, V., Čukanová, M., Myroshnychenko, I., Ruzhytsky, I., & Lyeonov, S. (2025). Interrelationship between decentralisation of energy sources and their renewability: A bibliometric analysis of research trends and thematic evolution. Environmental Economics, 16(3), 41-66.
- Binh, P. T., & Nguyen, T. T. T. (2023). Exploring the impact of public investment on income, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in ASEAN: New insights from a panel cointegration approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 6301-6315.
- DiXi Group. (n.d.). The largest database of open energy data for Ukraine. Energy Map.
- Dobrovolska, O., Kolotilina, O., & Ostapenko, M. (2024). Forecasting macroeconomic dynamics in Ukraine: The impact of a full-scale war. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(3), 211-237.
- European Commission. (2024). Ukraine 2024 report (SWD(2024) 699 final).
- Fernandes, K., Marathe, S. R., Parab, S., Amonkar, V., Vernekar, G., & Pandhre, S. S. (2025). Evaluating the role of government expenditure in promoting renewable energy and economic growth in India. Environmental Economics, 16(2), 162-172.
- Filipova, M., Djakona, A., & Haram, V. (2025). Determinants of government expenditures in the Baltic states. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(2), 66-89.
- Fitriningrum, A., Cindyawan, F., & Pulungan, A. H. (2025). Entrepreneurial orientation, affective commitment, and transformational leadership’s impacts on SMEs’ innovation performance. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(2), 145-159.
- Gualandri, F., & Kuzior, A. (2023). Home energy management systems adoption scenarios: The case of Italy. Energies, 16(13), Article 4946.
- Hedau, A., & Malla, V. (2024). Analyzing the impact of government policy measures on the return on equity. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(2), 157-169.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2023). Ukraine: Selected issues paper (IMF Staff Country Reports No. 400).
- Krause, J., Myroshnychenko, I., Tiutiunyk, S., & Latysh, D. (2024). Financial instruments of the green energy transition: Research landscape analysis. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 8(2), 198-212.
- Kuzior, A., Kovalenko, Y., Tiutiunyk, I., & Hrytsenko, L. (2025). Assessment of the energy security of EU countries in light of the expansion of renewable energy sources. Energies, 18(8), Article 2126.
- Kuzior, A., Liashenko, V., Petrova, I., & Serdiuk, O. (2023). Integrated models of the combination of EU grant funding and private funding in the energy sector of Ukraine based on public-private partnership. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal, 26(4), 165-194.
- Lyeonov, S., Kostyuchenko, N., Smolennikov, D., Tiutiunyk, I., & Telizhenko, O. (2026). Regional budget allocation and renewable energy development in Ukraine: Implications for public expenditure management [Data set]. Zenodo.
- Lyeonov, S., Moroz, A., Wenerska, B., & Tangl, A. (2025). The impact of feed-in tariffs and power purchase agreements on public investments in renewable energy. Journal of International Studies, 18(3), 179-218.
- Ministry of Finance of Ukraine. (n.d.). Portal “Budget for Citizens”. Open Budget.
- Nakamura, R., Nakazawa, J., & Matsumoto, A. (2012). Regional economic effects of CO2 reduction activities with wood biomass: Application and extension of a regional IO model. Studies in Regional Science, 42(4), 799-817.
- Ntuli, F., Ntshangase, B. A., & Msosa, S. K. (2025). Innovative financial management reforms: A catalyst of good governance in the South African public sector. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(4), 16-29.
- Oe, H., Yamaoka, Y., & Weeks, M. (2025). Public-private partnerships in traditional industries: A comparative governance framework for regional revitalization in Japan and Central Europe. Public Governance, Regulation and Law, 1(1), 1-15.
- Okunevičiūtė Neverauskienė, L., Dirma, V., Danilevičienė, I., GudelytėŽilinskienė, L., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2025). How investments into renewable sources affect economic development: A case of the EU countries. Journal of International Studies, 18(4), 243-255.
- Pecheniuk, A., Garasymchuk, I., Pantsyr, Y., Potapskyi, P., Vusatyi, M., Olenyuk, A., & Nesterenko, V. (2024). Problems and prospects of realizing the bioenergy potential of Ukraine. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources, 7(3), 223-243.
- Rakowska, J., & Ozimek, I. (2021). Renewable energy attitudes and behaviour of local governments in Poland. Energies, 14(10), Article 2765.
- Rouillé, A. (2024). Norm from the top: A social norm nudge to promote low-practiced behaviors without boomerang effect. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(1), 123-142.
- Sakrak, O. A., Battersby, B., Gonguet, F., Wendling, C., Charaoui, J., Petrie, M., & Suphachalasai, S. (2022, December). How to make the management of public finances climate sensitive: “Green PFM”. International Monetary Fund.
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (n.d.). Ukrstat.
- Streimikiene, D., Mikalauskas, I., Lėckienė, V., Pisula, T., & Mikalauskiene, A. (2024). The role of sustainable finance in the context of the European green course. Economics and Sociology, 17(2), 54-79.
- Tomczyk, A., Wojciechowski, W., Walczak, J., Lipiński, P., Wosiak, A., Morawski, M., & Napieralski, P. (2025). Operational HVAC energy load prediction: Edge-oriented forecasting models. Human Technology, 21(2), 431-447.
- Topazly, R., Pokotylova, O., Olishevska, A., Mykolaichuk, I., Parajka, B., & Lysak, V. (2025). Business leadership in the construction industry: The role of public-private interaction and price, investment, labor, and institutional determinants of development. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(3), 194-210.
- Trinh, L. D. (2025). Renewable energy and sustainable development: Evidence from lower middle-income countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(3), 905-926.
- Vasylieva, T., Derkacz, A., Popp, J., & Horsch, A. (2025a). From energy dependency to energy security: How the war in Ukraine accelerated renewable deployment in Europe. Economics and Sociology, 18(3), 229-253.
- Vasylieva, T., Vakulenko, I., & Horsch, A. (2025b). The impact of electricity price shocks triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on inflation in European countries: Insights for public governance. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(4), 486-512.
- Wojciechowski, W., Niewiadomski, A., & Bilan, Y. (2025). Ecological and secure electricity microgrids – Monitoring and forecasting challenges. Human Technology, 21(3), 469-473.
- World Bank, Government of Ukraine, European Union, & United Nations. (2023). Ukraine rapid damage and needs assessment: February 2022–February 2023.
- Yurchyk, H., Mishchuk, H., Bilan, S., & Skare, M. (2024). Social expenditure multiplier: Assessment of economic effect and optimal values. Economics and Sociology, 17(1), 182-195.
- Zábojník, S., & Branch, J. D. (2025). EU decarbonization and industrial export competitiveness in a small open economy: A surprising resilience. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(4), 1339-1385.
- Zhu, K., Yang, S., Zhou, M., & Qiu, X. (2026). Data-driven sustainable transformation: Big Data policies and corporate green innovation. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 21(1), 273-320.


