Heterogeneous associations between organizational circularity and enterprise economic performance in Ukraine and the EU
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.32
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #3, pp. 504–522
- 17 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The performance-related associations of circular practices may differ because waste recovery, recycled-input use, and circularity-related investment involve distinct costs, investments, and organizational mechanisms. This study examines heterogeneous associations between organizational circularity components and economic performance across 25 industrial enterprises in the Ukrainian operating and European comparison subsamples during 2013–2023. Fixed-effects regressions, decomposition, lagged and subgroup models, a non-imputed subsample, a balanced common-support window, pooled interactions, wild-cluster-bootstrap inference, and Holm adjustment were applied.
The aggregate circularity index shows no statistically significant short-term association with EBITDA margin (β = +0.0222; p = 0.894).
The decomposed components show different coefficient profiles, but formal heterogeneity is sample-sensitive: coefficient equality is not rejected in the full-panel decomposed model (M2) (p = 0.101) but is rejected in the non-imputed model (M3) (p = 0.002). Recycled-input use is predominantly negative and nominally significant in the one-period lag-only (M4) and Ukrainian operating subsample (M6) models, although neither coefficient survives Holm adjustment and the lagged estimate is not reproduced in the combined model. Circularity-related eco-capex is positive in M3 and the European comparison subsample model (M5), where it is supported by unadjusted wild-cluster-bootstrap (p = 0.0198) and Holm-adjusted CR1 inference (p = 0.0273). The country-context interaction block is jointly significant (p = 0.042), with RI × UA as the only individually significant interaction (β = –1.566; p = 0.038).
The findings indicate that aggregate measures may conceal component-specific patterns, but most associations remain sample- or specification-sensitive and should not be interpreted causally. Enterprise assessment should distinguish recovery, material-substitution, and investment-modernization channels.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M11, Q56, M21, C33
-
References43
-
Tables9
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Dynamics of the aggregate circularity index (CI) in the Ukrainian operating and European comparison subsamples, 2013–2023
- Figure 2. Circularity component coefficients with 95% confidence intervals
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics of key variables, full panel, 2013–2023
- Table 2. Welch t-test results for differences between Ukrainian operating and European comparison subsamples
- Table 3. Pearson correlations among core variables
- Table A1. Sample selection and panel construction algorithm
- Table A2. Operational harmonization and data-status rules for circularity components
- Table B1. Enterprise-level provenance of circularity components in the non-imputed subsample, 2013–2023
- Table C1. Main panel regression results (M1 to M9)
- Table D1. Formal tests and model diagnostics
- Table E1. Hypothesis verification based on panel model estimates and formal tests
-
- Akinwale, Y. O. (2024). Circular economy awareness, adoption, and its effects on business performance in Saudi Arabia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 119-133.
- Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Bryde, D. J., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Effect of eco-innovation on green supply chain management, circular economy capability, and performance of small and medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 141, 60-72.
- Bloomberg. (n.d.). Company financials, estimates and pricing point-in-time.
- Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320.
- Calzolari, T., Genovese, A., & Brint, A. (2021). The adoption of circular economy practices in supply chains – An assessment of European multi-national enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312, Article 127616.
- CDP. (n.d.). Use CDP data.
- Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Parkes, G., Tuyet, N. T. A., Long, D. D., & Ha, T. P. (2022). Impact of organizational factors on the circular economy practices and sustainable performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in Vietnam. Journal of Business Research, 147, 362-378.
- D’Adamo, I., Favari, D., Gastaldi, M., & Kirchherr, J. (2024). Towards circular economy indicators: Evidence from the European Union. Waste Management & Research, 42(8), 670-680.
- Dey, P. K., Malesios, C., Chowdhury, S., Saha, K., Budhwar, P., & De, D. (2022). Adoption of circular economy practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, Article 108496.
- EEX. (n.d.). EU ETS spot, futures & options.
- Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2017). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2741-2751.
- European Commission. (n.d.). EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS).
- Eurostat. (2008). NACE Rev. 2: Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C., Arranz, N., Schumann, M., & Arroyabe, M. F. (2021). The development of CE business models in firms: The role of circular economy capabilities. Technovation, 106, Article 102292.
- Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Soufani, K. (2020). Circular business models: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, Article 123741.
- Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.
- GHG Protocol. (n.d.). Corporate standard.
- Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32.
- Global Reporting Initiative. (n.d.). GRI standards.
- Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Boiral, O., & Testa, F. (2023). Circular economy at the company level: An empirical study based on sustainability reports. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2307-2317.
- Horbach, J., & Rammer, C. (2020). Circular economy innovations, growth and employment at the firm level: Empirical evidence from Germany. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24(3), 615-625.
- Jabbour, C. J. C., Seuring, S., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jugend, D., Fiorini, P. C., Latan, H., & Izeppi, W. C. (2020). Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, Article 110416.
- Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232.
- Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46.
- Kristensen, H. S., & Mosgaard, M. A. (2020). A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy – Moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, Article 118531.
- Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy – Towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(1), Article 43.
- Lin, W. L., Lee, C., & Law, S. H. (2021). Asymmetric effects of corporate sustainability strategy on value creation among global automotive firms: A dynamic panel quantile regression approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 931-954.
- LSEG. (n.d.). Company data.
- Mazzucchelli, A., Chierici, R., Del Giudice, M., & Bua, I. (2022). Do circular economy practices affect corporate performance? Evidence from Italian large-sized manufacturing firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(6), 2016-2029.
- Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G. A., Alaerts, L., Van Acker, K., de Meester, S., & Dewulf, J. (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 452-461.
- Negri, M., Neri, A., Cagno, E., & Monfardini, G. (2021). Circular economy performance measurement in manufacturing firms: A systematic literature review with insights for small and medium enterprises and new adopters. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9049.
- Pan, X., Wong, C. W. Y., Wong, C. Y., Boon-itt, S., & Li, C. (2024). The influences of circular economy practices on manufacturing firm’s performance: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study. International Journal of Production Economics, 273, Article 109267.
- Pieroni, M. P. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2019). Business model innovation for circular economy and sustainability: A review of approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 198-216.
- Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Mäkinen, S. J. (2018). Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 70-82.
- Sacco, P., Vinante, C., Borgianni, Y., & Orzes, G. (2021). Circular economy at the firm level: A new tool for assessing maturity and circularity. Sustainability, 13(9), Article 5288.
- Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., & Kendall, A. (2019). A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 542-559.
- Stewart, R., & Niero, M. (2018). Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(7), 1005-1022.
- Suslikov, S., Kuchynskyi, V., Gliznutsa, M., Vozniuk, I., & Bratukh, O. (2026). Composite assessment of the economic performance of circular transformation performance in industrial enterprises in the economy – environment – society dimension. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(4(88)), 25-34.
- Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Chiesa, V. (2017). Towards a new taxonomy of circular economy business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 487-498.
- Vinante, C., Sacco, P., Orzes, G., & Borgianni, Y. (2021). Circular economy metrics: Literature review and company-level classification framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, Article 125090.
- Vitolla, F., L’Abate, V., Petruzzella, F., Raimo, N., & Salvi, A. (2023). Circular economy disclosure in sustainability reporting: The effect of firm characteristics. Sustainability, 15(3), Article 2200.
- Yin, S., Jia, F., Chen, L., & Wang, Q. (2023). Circular economy practices and sustainable performance: A meta-analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, Article 106838.
- Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Lai, K. H. (2011). Environmental supply chain cooperation and its effect on the circular economy practice-performance relationship among Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(3), 405-419.


