Green supply chain practices and competitive advantage: The roles of integration and environmental uncertainty
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.44
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #3, pp. 718–734
- 4 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
In highly dynamic markets with regulatory, market, and technological pressures, especially in emerging economies, manufacturing companies are increasingly striving to become environmentally sustainable, mitigate environmental liabilities, and enhance their competitive advantage. This study investigates the relationship between green supply chain practices and competitive advantage in Jordanian manufacturing companies through the lens of supply chain integration as a mediator and environmental uncertainty as a moderator. From March to June 2025, a quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted among managers whose direct responsibilities include supply chain management, procurement, operations, environmental management, and strategic decision-making. After data screening, 254 responses eligible for analysis were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 4. Green supply chain practice was found to have a positive relationship with supply chain integration (β = 0.676, p < 0.001) and competitive advantage (β = 0.298, p = 0.012) among respondents. Supply chain integration was also positively associated with competitive advantage (β = 0.527, p < 0.001), and the estimated indirect effect of SC integration was statistically significant (β = 0.356, p < 0.001). The interaction between green supply chain practices and environmental uncertainty was positive and statistically significant in predicting competitive advantage (β = 0.172, p = 0.021), indicating that it might be stronger in a more uncertain environment. Overall, the results suggest that supply chain integration could be a strategy to achieve competitive results from the environment. But the findings should be viewed as statistical relationships, not causal relationships, given a cross-sectional, self-reported, single-informant, non-random sample in one national manufacturing context.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to address the gratitude to all the respondents who took part in this research. The authors also mention the assistance of the colleagues and institutions that helped in the process of data collection.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M11, Q56, L23
-
References43
-
Tables10
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research model
-
- Table 1. Survey procedure and primary data
- Table 2. Profile of respondents and the 254 participating firms
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics, factor loadings, and collinearity
- Table 4. Measurement model assessment
- Table 5. Discriminant validity
- Table 6. Hypotheses testing
- Table 7. Mediation results
- Table 8. Moderation results
- Table 9. Simple slope analysis of environmental uncertainty
- Table A1. All items were measured using a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree
-
- Abdellatif, H., & Graham, S. (2019). Green supply chain management practices in developing countries: A case study from Jordan. Management, 31, 36.
- Agazu, B. G., Kero, C. A., & Debela, K. L. (2026). Transformational leadership influence on industrial park firms’ performance in Ethiopia: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. SN Business & Economics, 6(1), 37.
- Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Agnikpe, C., Cai, J., Ahenkorah, E., & Dacosta, E. (2021). Exploring the mediating influences of total quality management and just in time between green supply chain practices and performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(1), 156-175.
- Ahmed Mustafi, M. A., Dong, Y.-J., & Hosain, M. S. (2025). The mediating role of perceived competitive advantage on the relationships between green supply chain management practices and operational performance: Evidence from Bangladeshi manufacturing firms. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 32(4), 1284-1307.
- Al Amin, M., Chakraborty, A., & Baldacci, R. (2025). Industry 5.0 and green supply chain management synergy for sustainable development in Bangladeshi RMG industries. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 14, Article 100208.
- Almheiri, R. K., Jabeen, F., Kazi, M., & Santoro, G. (2025). Big data analytics and competitive performance: The role of environmental uncertainty, managerial support and data-driven culture. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 36(5), 1071-1094.
- Do, H., Yan, S., & Gong, Y. (2026). Exploring the nexus between internationalization and sustainable supply chain management among UK SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment.
- Duong, N. H., & Ha, Q. (2021). The links between supply chain risk management practices, supply chain integration and supply chain performance in Southern Vietnam: A moderation effect of supply chain social sustainability. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1).
- Elnadi, M., Gheith, M. H., Troise, C., Abdallah, Y. O., & Abdelaziz, M. A. A. (2026). Digital transformation and sustainable supply chain performance for sustainable development: The mediating role of supply chain capabilities. Sustainable Development, 34, 611-637.
- Febrianto, A., & Rufaidah, P. (2026). Analysing the role of innovation capability and environmental uncertainty on firms’ competitive advantage: A systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 13(1), Article 2619230.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Government of Jordan. (2022). Economic Modernisation Vision: Unleashing potential to build the future. (In Arabic).
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part I – Method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-76.
- Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
- Javed, A., Basit, A., Shahzad, M. A., & Khan, M. K. (2026). Green supply chain integration and knowledge dynamics: A pathway to incremental and radical green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1-22.
- Javed, A., Li, Q., & Basit, A. (2025). Enhancing ambidextrous green innovation: The role of green supply chain integration, knowledge capabilities and technology dynamism in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 36(2), 431-454.
- Kurrahman, T., Tsai, F. M., Lim, M. K., Sethanan, K., & Tseng, M.-L. (2025). Generative AI capabilities for green supply chain management improvement: Extended dynamic capabilities view. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 1-28.
- Li, Y., Li, X., Li, G., Magrizos, S., & Christofi, M. (2026). Transformational and transactional leadership, sustainable supply chain management practice, and organizational responsiveness: The moderating role of TMT sustainability commitment. Business Strategy and the Environment.
- Magdy, A., & Elmakkawy, M. H. (2025). From turmoil to triumph: Does environmental uncertainty matter to organizational creativity and competitive advantage? The role of organizational agility. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 26(5), 1015-1036.
- Ministry of Environment. (2017). Environmental Protection Law No. 6 of 2017.
- Ministry of Environment. (2020). Environmental Classification & Licensing Regulation No. 69 of 2020. Government of Jordan. :
- Muhammad, R., & Saad, S. (2023). Achieving a competitive advantage: Supply chain management practices and responsiveness. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3), 451-461.
- Mustafi, M. A. A., Dong, Y.-J., Roy, I., Mony, F. K., & Arefin, M. S. (2026). Enhancing environmental performance through green supply chain management practices: A mediated moderation model. SAGE Open, 16(1), Article 21582440251412196.
- Nawafleh, S., Al-Ajlouni, M. I., & Alfawaeer, M. (2026). Environmental organizational awareness and sustainability benchmarking: The role of green supply chain practices and green human resource management. Benchmarking: An International Journal.
- Nyamah, E. Y., Nyamah, E. Y., Opoku, R. K., & Attatsi, P. B. (2026). Sustainable supply chain practices and sustainable performance in a developing economy: Do governance quality and performance metrics matter? Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 1-30.
- Orji, I. J., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Okwara, U. K. (2024). Sustainability and the digital supply chain. In J. Sarkis (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of supply chain management (pp. 1467-1485). Springer International Publishing.
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3), 60-78.
- Rahman, M. A., Saha, P., Belal, H. M., Hasan Ratul, S., & Graham, G. (2026). Big data analytics capability and supply chain sustainability: Analyzing the moderating role of green supply chain management practices. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 33(2), 417-443.
- Rashid, A., Rasheed, R., Rahi, S., & Amirah, N. A. (2025). Impact of supplier trust and integrated technology on supply chain resilience for sustainable supply chain in FMCG sector. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.
- Romagnoli, S., Tarabu’, C., Maleki Vishkaei, B., & De Giovanni, P. (2023). The impact of digital technologies and sustainable practices on circular supply chain management. Logistics, 7(1), Article 1.
- Roy, S., Das, M., Ali, S. M., Raihan, A. S., Paul, S. K., & Kabir, G. (2020). Evaluating strategies for environmental sustainability in a supply chain of an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, Article 121389.
- Santos, C., Coelho, A., & Cancela, B. L. (2025). The impact of greenwashing on sustainability through green supply chain integration: The moderating role of information sharing. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(9), 21709-21736.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Springer.
- Schilling, L., & Seuring, S. (2024). Linking the digital and sustainable transformation with supply chain practices. International Journal of Production Research, 62(3), 949-973.
- Shakeel, A., & Siddiqui, S. M. F. A. (2026). Green supply chain integration and sustainable supply chain performance: The mediating roles of green innovation and supply chain resilience, and the moderating roles of green value co-creation and absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Science Research Review, 5(1), 757-791.
- Shebeshe, E. N., & Sharma, D. (2026). Does sustainable supply chain management practice drive manufacturing success in an emerging economy? International Journal of Applied Management Science, 18(1), 64-89.
- Singh, K., Chaudhuri, R., & Chatterjee, S. (2025). Assessing the impact of digital transformation on green supply chain for achieving carbon neutrality and accelerating circular economy initiatives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 201, Article 110943.
- Sohu, J. M., Makhdoom, Q., Shah, S. M. M., Sohu, F. M., Ahmed, G., Talpur, M. H., & Hongyun, T. (2026). Benchmarking best practices: Integrating big data analytics and green supply chain management for enhanced sustainable performance in food processing SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 1-32.
- Valashiya, M. C., & Luke, R. (2023). Enhancing supply chain information sharing with third-party logistics service providers. International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(6), 1523-1542.
- Van, H. V., Abu Afifa, M., & Bui, D. V. (2025). Green innovation and sustainability reporting: Linking environmental practices to sustainable competitive advantage through a moderated moderation and mediation model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(7), 8100–8117.
- Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: Strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 72-96.
- Wu, J., Yan, Y., Wang, S., & Zhen, L. (2025). Optimizing blockchain-enabled sustainable supply chains. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 72, 426-445.
- Yan, M.-R., Yan, H., Chen, Y.-R., Zhang, Y., Yan, X., & Zhao, Y. (2026). Integrated green supply chain system development with digital transformation. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 29(3), 394-415.


