Dynamic capabilities as mechanisms for sustainability and innovation: A systematic literature review
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.14
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #3, pp. 188–206
- 7 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Contemporary organizations face mounting pressure to adapt beyond the imperatives of market competition, navigating demands that span digital disruption, sustainability transitions, and systemic institutional change. Despite the centrality of dynamic capabilities as an explanatory framework in strategic management, the literature has predominantly examined them through the lens of competitive advantage, leaving broader organizational and societal applications underexplored. This study addresses that gap by examining how the dynamic capabilities framework is theorized and applied in contexts beyond firm-level competitive advantage. A systematic literature review combined with bibliometric analysis was conducted using Scopus, covering peer-reviewed publications from 1995 to 2025. Three search strings, dynamic capabilities and technology, dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity, and dynamic capabilities and sustainability, yielded 750 articles after applying inclusion, exclusion, and quality criteria. VOSviewer was used for keyword co-occurrence mapping and cluster visualization, while qualitative thematic coding was conducted in MAXQDA to deepen interpretation. The analysis identified four structurally interconnected clusters: innovation, digital transformation, technology, and sustainability. The findings suggest that innovation is frequently treated in the literature as a key enactment mechanism of dynamic capabilities, with 691 co-occurrences and 215 overlapping coded segments. Sustainability represented the largest and most rapidly expanding domain, with 352 filtered articles, while technology functioned as an enabling layer rather than a capability in itself. These findings demonstrate that dynamic capabilities are undergoing a substantive reorientation, from performance-centric mechanisms toward integrative governance processes for navigating socio-technical complexity. Organizations should embed dynamic capabilities in innovation routines, digitally supported sensing processes, and sustainability-aligned strategic priorities.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q01, M10, O31
-
References45
-
Tables3
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram
- Figure 2. Cluster visualization
- Figure 3. Innovation cluster and its ties with ambidexterity
- Figure 4. Sustainability cluster
- Figure 5. Code co-occurrence model (code intersection)
-
- Table 1. Results of the three search strings
- Table 2. Results of search strings after criteria applied
- Table 3. Code relations browser
-
- Amui, L. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Kannan, D. (2017). Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: A systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 308-322.
- Bari, N., Chimhundu, R., & Chan, K.-C. (2022). Dynamic capabilities to achieve corporate sustainability: A roadmap to sustained competitive advantage. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1531.
- Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 36(1), 256-280.
- Bashar, A., Wasiq, M., Nyagadza, B., & Maziriri, E. T. (2024). Emerging trends in social media marketing: A retrospective review using data mining and bibliometric analysis. Future Business Journal, 10(1), Article 23.
- Bocken, N. M. P., & Geradts, T. H. J. (2020). Barriers and drivers to sustainable business model innovation: Organization design and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 53(4), Article 101950.
- Castiaux, A. (2012). Developing dynamic capabilities to meet sustainable development challenges. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(6), Article 1240013.
- Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 4912-4917.
- Dean, B. P. (2021). Developing and leading ambidextrous teams: A team-centric framework of ambidexterity in volatile environments. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 120-146.
- Del Rio, P., Peñasco, C., & Romero-Jordán, D. (2016). What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2158-2170.
- Dhingra, V., Keswani, S., Sama, R., & Noor Mohamed Qureshi, M. R. (2024). Social media influencers: A systematic review using PRISMA. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2368100.
- Ellström, D., Holtström, J., Berg, E., & Josefsson, C. (2022). Dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(2), 272-286.
- Fan, P., & Liu, Z. (2024). Formation mechanisms of dynamic capabilities based on relational capital of enterprises in emerging economies under institutional change: A multiple case study in the context of China’s reform and opening-up. Asian Business & Management, 23(4), 688-731.
- Farzaneh, M., Wilden, R., Afshari, L., & Mehralian, G. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation ambidexterity: The roles of intellectual capital and innovation orientation. Journal of Business Research, 148, 47-59.
- Gremme, K.-M., & Wohlgemuth, V. (2017). Dynamic capabilities: A systematic literature review of theory and practice. European Journal of Management Issues, 25(1), 30-35.
- Heikinheimo, M. (2025). Dynamic capabilities and multi-sided platforms: Fostering agility, flexibility, and resilience. Industrial Marketing Management.
- Hermundsdottir, F., Bjørgum, Ø., & Eide, A. E. (2024). Transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy: Identifying the necessary dynamic capabilities for a transition among Norwegian oil and gas companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6315.
- Jabri, M. A., & Lahrech, A. (2025). The role of strategic orientations in the relationship between adaptive marketing capabilities and ambidexterity in digital services firms: The case of a highly competitive digital economy. Systems, 13(5), Article 358.
- Jafari-Sadeghi, V., Garcia-Perez, A., Candelo, E., & Couturier, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 100-111.
- Kahale, L. A., El Khoury, C., El Mikati, I., Pardo-Hernandez, H., Khamis, A. M., Schünemann, H.J., Haddaway, N.R., & Akl, E.A. (2021). PRISMA flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: A methodological survey and a proposal. F1000Research, 10.
- Kitchenham, B. A., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S. G., Pretorius, R., & Budgen, D. (2009). The impact of limited search procedures for systematic literature reviews. A participant-observer case study. In 2009 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (pp. 336-345).
- Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Working with bibliographic information and creating literature reviews. In Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA (1st ed., pp. 187-200). Cham: Springer.
- Linde, L., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration. A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, Article 120614.
- Loureiro, R., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Simões, J. (2021). Approaches to measuring dynamic capabilities: Theoretical insights and the research agenda. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 62, Article 101657.
- Neri, A., Negri, M., Cagno, E., Kumar, V., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2023). What digital-enabled dynamic capabilities support the circular economy? A multiple case study approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 5083-5101.
- O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article 71.
- Pang, C., Yang, G., & Liu, Y. (2025). Which dynamic capabilities lead to high business model innovation? Configurational evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review.
- Patrício, V., Pereira, L., & Santos, J. P. (2019). Dynamic capabilities trends: A brief review of the state of the art. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) (pp. 1-5). Valbonne Sophia-Antipolis, France.
- Pezeshkan, A., Fainshmidt, S., Nair, A., Frazier, M. L., & Markowski, E. (2016). An empirical assessment of the dynamic capabilities–performance relationship. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2950-2956.
- Rethlefsen, M. L., & Page, M. J. (2022). PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: Common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(2), 253-257.
- Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2024). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Schilke, O., & Helfat, C. E. (2025). Unlocking dynamic capabilities: Pathways for empirical research. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 3(2), 71-87.
- Schlosser, K.P., Spilbergs, A., & Volkova, T. (2023). The effect of ambidextrous strategic leadership and digital technology adoption on creating shared value. European Research Studies Journal, XXVI(2), 577-605.
- Shiferaw, R. M., & Kero, C. A. (2024). Dynamic capabilities view practices of business firms: A systematic literature review. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).
- Stoeber, T., & Kanbach, D. K. (2025). Innovating beyond boundaries: Enhancing firms’ dynamic capabilities through open innovation. Management Review Quarterly, 76(2), 1549-1570.
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
- Teece, D.J. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, 1(2), 233-253.
- Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
- Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29.
- Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
- Veiga, P., Rocha, J., & Silva, F. (2023). Exploring the connections: Ambidexterity, digital capabilities, resilience, and behavioral innovation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(10), 957-974.
- VERBI Software. (2022). Guide to Conducting Literature Reviews Using MAXQDA. Berlin, Germany: VERBI Software. Consult. Sozialforschung. GmbH.
- Warner, K., & Wäger, M. (2018). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349.
- Wong, D. T. W., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2021). Economic, organizational, and environmental capabilities for business sustainability competence: Findings from case studies in the fashion business. Journal of Business Research, 126, 440-471.
- Zhang, J., Li, H., & Zhao, H. (2025). The impact of digital transformation on organizational resilience: The role of innovation capability and agile response. Systems, 13(2), Article 75.


