Cross-sectional mediation evidence with panel robustness checks of economic complexity, logistics performance, and country innovation, 2020–2024
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.30
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #3, pp. 474-487
- 7 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study examines whether logistics performance mediates the relationship between economic complexity and national innovation outcomes. The sample comprises the top-20 economies of the Global Innovation Index (2025) and Ukraine, observed over 2020–2024. The mediation model is estimated on the 2024 cross-section (n = 21) using OLS and the Baron–Kenny procedure. Cross-sectional point estimates indicate an indirect effect via the Logistics Performance Index of 7.585 GII points, 46.3% of the total effect (c = 16.366, p < 0.001), while the software–expenditure channel fails the Baron–Kenny conditions. The pooled panel corroborates the channel: the indirect effect equals 6.551 points (52.0% of the total effect), with the LPI–GII path highly significant (p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis shows that the mediation is identified primarily by the contrast between the innovation frontier and Ukraine: excluding Ukraine, the ECI–LPI path loses significance while the LPI–GII path remains robust, consistent with saturation of the logistics channel within the frontier, where LPI varies only between 3.6 and 4.3. The bootstrap confidence interval for the indirect effect includes zero at n = 21, so the mediation findings are suggestive rather than confirmatory. Fixed-effects estimation shows that the ECI–GII relationship is predominantly structural (within-R2 = 0.056), while LPI retains within-country significance (β = 3.60, p = 0.042). An illustrative arithmetic scenario translates Ukraine’s LPI gap to the sample median into approximately 16 GII points. Findings position logistics infrastructure as a first-order margin for catching-up economies seeking to convert productive complexity into innovation capacity.
Acknowledgments
This research contains results of the research “Fundamentals of Sustainable and Inclusive Regional Spatial Development for Post-War Reconstruction in the Context of Digital Transformation” (№ 0125U001620, 2025-2027) funded by a grant from the state budget of Ukraine.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C23, O14, O31, R41
-
References37
-
Tables9
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics (cross-section 2024, n = 21)
- Table 2. Pearson correlation matrix (n = 21, cross-section 2024; n = 105 for full-panel row)
- Table 3. OLS regression results: Models M1–M4 (cross-section 2024, n = 21)
- Table 4. Baron–Kenny mediation analysis (cross-section 2024, n = 21)
- Table 5. Robustness verification matrix
- Table 6. Effect size analysis and robust SE comparison (M3, n = 21)
- Table 7. Breusch–Pagan homoscedasticity test: OLS Models M1–M3 (n = 21, 2024)
- Table 8. Pooled panel mediation estimation, 2020–2024 (year fixed effects; country-clustered SE)
- Table A1. Dataset
-
- Ashraf, S., Jithin, P., Slim, S., & Najeeb, R. (2023). Global value chains and economic complexity index: Evidence from generalised panel quantile regression. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 347-365.
- Balland, P.-A., Broekel, T., Diodato, D., Giuliani, E., Hausmann, R., O'Clery, N., & Rigby, D. (2022). The new paradigm of economic complexity. Research Policy, 51(3), Article 104450.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
- Çelebi, Ü. (2021). The impact of logistics performance index upon gross domestic product: Mediating roles of foreign direct investment and patents. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 15(1), 29-45.
- Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the promise of social entrepreneurship.
- Ekici, Ş. Ö., Kabak, Ö., & Ülengin, F. (2019). Improving logistics performance by reforming the pillars of Global Competitiveness Index. Transport Policy, 81, 197-207.
- Gereffi, G., Pananond, P., Tell, F., & Fang, T. (2025). Navigating industrial policy and global value chains in an era of disruptions. Journal of International Business Policy, 8, 207-223.
- Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Foroughi, B., Tseng, M. L., Nikbin, D., & Khanfar, A. A. A. (2025). Industry 4.0 digital transformation and opportunities for supply chain resilience. Production Planning & Control, 36(1), 61-91.
- Global Innovation Index. (2024). Which are the most innovative economies in 2024? Global Innovation Index 2024.
- Global Innovation Index. (n.d.). Global Innovation Index.
- Growth Lab, Harvard Kennedy School. (2024, October 4). Atlas of Economic Complexity 10.0 brings new data and product space design. Harvard University.
- Hartmann, D., Guevara, M. R., Jara-Figueroa, C., Aristarán, M., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2017). Linking economic complexity, institutions and income inequality. World Development, 93, 75-93.
- Hidalgo, C. A. (2023). The policy implications of economic complexity. Research Policy, 52(9), Article 104863.
- Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. In P. S. Dasgupta (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10570-10575.
- Karbevska, L., & Hidalgo, C. A. (2025). Mapping global value chains at the product level. EPJ Data Science, 14(1), Article 21.
- Kayar, G. A., & Avsar, I. I. (2025). Comparative innovative logistics performance analysis of G7-BRICS countries using SWARA–MEREC based EDAS methodology. Archives of Transport, 75(3).
- Krammer, S. M. S. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: Evidence from a panel of Eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38(5), 845-860.
- Negi, S. (2021). Supply chain efficiency framework to improve business performance in a competitive era. Management Research Review, 44(3), 477-508.
- Negi, S. (2024). Global supply chain competitiveness: The synergistic role of integrated logistics and global sourcing. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43, 111-130.
- Polat, M., Kara, K., & Acar, A. Z. (2023). Competitiveness-based logistics performance index: An empirical analysis in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 24(2-3), 97-119.
- Samuels, A. (2025). Examining the integration of artificial intelligence in supply chain management from Industry 4.0 to 6.0: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1477044.
- Şanlı, D., Gülbay Yiğiteli, N., & Ergün Tatar, H. (2024). Do economic complexity drivers differ by income level? Insights from a global perspective. SAGE Open, 14(1).
- Sharawi, H., Alsaadi, L., & Alsagri, M. (2025). The impact of LPIs' indicators on the global logistics performance index: Global perspective. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(7), Article 2025361.
- Solingen, E. (2025). Global value chains in a brave new world of geopolitics. Journal of Political Power, 18(1), 112-124.
- Trading Economics. (n.d.). Ukraine GDP annual growth rate.
- Wang, M., & Prajogo, D. (2024). The effect of supply chain digitalisation on a firm's performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 124(5), 1725-1745.
- Wang, M., Childerhouse, P., & Abareshi, A. (2024). Global logistics and supply chain integration in the digital era: A focus on China's Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 22(2), 58-79.
- World Bank. (2023). Connecting to compete 2023. Trade logistics in the global economy.
- World Economics. (n.d.). GDP per capita annual growth rates.
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2020). Global Innovation Index 2020.
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2021). Global Innovation Index 2021.
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022.
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023.
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024.
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (n.d.). Software spending, % GDP.
- World Trade Organization (WTO). (2025). Global Value Chain Development Report 2025: Chapter 1. World Trade Organization.
- Wu, X., Guo, H., & Li, Y. (2025). The impact of supply chain digitalization on firms' performance. Journal of Business Logistics.


