The effect of leadership style on employees’ organizational commitment: A case of the Lithuanian healthcare sector

  • 16 Views
  • 1 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
The healthcare sector in Lithuania faces high employee turnover, burnout, and low organizational commitment, which are often exacerbated by ineffective leadership. This study aimed to assess the influence of managerial leadership styles on employees’ organizational commitment in the Lithuanian healthcare sector. A quantitative survey was conducted among 422 healthcare professionals using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ), the primary measurement tool of the Full Range Leadership Model developed by Avolio and Bass, and Meyer and Allen’s Organizational Commitment Questionnaire. The results revealed that laissez-faire leadership was the dominant style, followed by transactional and transformational styles. Organizational commitment among employees was generally below average, with affective commitment being the most prominent dimension. Correlation and regression analyses revealed that all three leadership styles were positively associated with organizational commitment; however, the strongest predictive effect was found for transformational leadership, while laissez-faire leadership also demonstrated a statistically significant positive influence, particularly on affective commitment. This finding diverges from conventional expectations within the Full Range Leadership Model and is interpreted as context-specific. The impact of transactional leadership was positive but not statistically significant. These findings suggest that in a context where professionals are highly autonomous and qualified, leadership that fosters independence can enhance emotional commitment. However, overreliance on passive leadership may risk long-term engagement. The study emphasizes the importance of adopting a balanced and context-sensitive approach to leadership in healthcare institutions.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents
    • Table 2. Evaluation of leadership style dimensions
    • Table 3. Evaluation of employee organizational commitment dimensions
    • Table 4. The relationship between employee organizational commitment and its dimensions, as well as the expression of leadership styles
    • Table 5. The relationship between employee organizational commitment and its dimensions, as well as the expression of leadership style elements
    • Table 6. The impact of the leadership style construct on the dimensions of organizational commitment
    • Conceptualization
      Alina Timofejevaitė, Violeta Šilingienė
    • Data curation
      Alina Timofejevaitė
    • Formal Analysis
      Alina Timofejevaitė, Violeta Šilingienė
    • Investigation
      Alina Timofejevaitė
    • Methodology
      Alina Timofejevaitė, Violeta Šilingienė
    • Resources
      Alina Timofejevaitė, Violeta Šilingienė
    • Validation
      Alina Timofejevaitė, Violeta Šilingienė
    • Visualization
      Alina Timofejevaitė
    • Writing – original draft
      Alina Timofejevaitė, Violeta Šilingienė
    • Writing – review & editing
      Alina Timofejevaitė, Violeta Šilingienė
    • Project administration
      Violeta Šilingienė
    • Supervision
      Violeta Šilingienė