A work-applied framework of dynamic resource management in the industrial value chain: Evidence from Thailand
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(2).2026.35
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #2, pp. 515-535
- 17 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Industrial value chains in emerging economies require integrated organizational capabilities to sustain adaptability and applied knowledge under technological and structural change. This study examines the structural relationships among dynamic resources, employee centricity, integrated knowledge, and practical knowledge management and tests a work-applied dynamic resource management framework within Thailand’s industrial value chain.
A quantitative research design employing structural equation modeling was used, based on data collected from 600 executives and business owners across industrial sectors in Thailand. The results showed that the final model fit the empirical data well, with CMIN-p = 0.089, CMIN/DF = 1.118, GFI = 0.962, and RMSEA = 0.014. All hypothesized relationships were statistically significant at p < 0.001. Dynamic resources significantly influenced employee centricity and practical knowledge management, while employee centricity strongly reinforced integrated knowledge, representing the strongest structural path in the model (β = 0.93). The model explained substantial variance in employee centricity, integrated knowledge, and practical knowledge management (R² = 0.80, 0.86, and 0.93, respectively). New S-Curve industries also exhibited the highest overall dynamic resource management construct levels, reflecting stronger adaptive and knowledge-integrative orientations.
The findings indicate that organizational adaptability in industrial value chains is strengthened when adaptive resources, employee-centered governance, and integrated knowledge processes are aligned within a coherent capability structure.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the participation of 600 executives from Thai industrial enterprises whose contributions made this research possible. The authors also thank the academic and industry experts for their valuable insights and constructive feedback, which helped improve the rigor and quality of the study.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L21, M12, O15, L23
-
References44
-
Tables7
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Structural model
-
- Table 1. Theoretical and empirical foundations of the research hypotheses
- Table 2. Characteristics of the sampled industrial enterprises
- Table 3. Comparison of DRM constructs across industry types
- Table 4. Structural path estimates from SEM
- Table 5. Highest-scoring observed variables
- Table 6. Results of hypotheses testing
- Table 7. Direct, indirect, and total effects in the structural model
-
- Alavi, M., & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
- Allameh, S. M., Khozani, M. K., & Baniasadi, B. (2020). Consequences of knowledge processes in small businesses: The role of knowledge acquisition, dynamic capabilities, knowledge sharing, and creativity. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 10(1), 48-68.
- Alonso, A.D., Vu, O.T.K., Nguyen, T.Q., McClelland, R., Nguyen, N.M., Huynh, H.T.N., & Tran, T.D. (2024). Industry 4.0 involvement and knowledge management across industries: A qualitative investigation from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 174, Article 114538.
- Apascaritei, P., & Elvira, M.M. (2022). Dynamising human resources: An integrative review of SHRM and dynamic capabilities research. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), Article 100878.
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2019). IBM SPSS Amos 26 user’s guide. IBM.
- Azarmipour, M., Elfaham, H., Grothoff, J., von Trotha, C., Gries, C., & Epple, U. (2018). Dynamic resource management for virtualisation in industrial automation. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON) (pp. 3664-3669).
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
- Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organisations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press.
- Department of Industrial Works, Ministry of Industry of Thailand. (2022). Number of industrial factories in Thailand in 2022. (In Thai).
- Eger, L., & Žižka, M. (2024). Industry 4.0, digital transformation and human resource management: Emerging themes and research trends in the context of the Visegrad countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(3), 1021-1065.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105-1121.
- Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management.
- Gläser, W. (2023). VUCA as a practical model: A commentary. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 12(2), 267-275.
- Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
- Hair, J. F. Jr, Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
- Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
- Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P.A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guideline. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20.
- Iddris, F., Dogbe, C.S.K., & Kparl, E.M. (2023). Transformational leadership, employee self-efficacy, employee innovativeness, customer-centricity, and organisational competitiveness among insurance firms. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(5), 756-775.
- International Institute for Management Development. (2022). IMD World Competitiveness Booklet 2022.
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
- Koller, I., Levenson, M. R., & Glück, J. (2017). What do you think you are measuring? A mixed-methods procedure for assessing the content validity of test items and theory-based scaling. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 126.
- Lappalainen, P., Saunila, M., Ukko, J., Rantanen, H.J., & Rantala, T. (2024). Diagnosing leadership – Construction and validation of the leadership impact inventory. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(11), 294-324.
- Lisdiono, P., Said, J., Yusoff, H., & Hermawan, A. A. (2022). Risk management practice, alliance management capability, and enterprise resilience: Findings from Indonesian state-owned enterprises. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(1), 190-202.
- Lombardi, C. V., Chidiac, N.T., & Record, B. C. (2021). Starbucks Coffee corporation’s marketing response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Innovative Marketing, 17(2), 177-188.
- Ministry of Labour of Thailand. (2021). Study report on research guidelines for enhancing labour productivity to develop the quality of Thai labour productivity.
- National Statistical Office of Thailand. (2020). The labour force survey report. Ministry of Labour.
- Ngo, L. V., Nguyen, N. P., Huynh, K. T., Gregory, G., & Cuong, P. H. (2020). Converting internal brand knowledge into employee performance. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(3), 273-287.
- Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54.
- Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board of Thailand. (2018). National strategy 2018–2037 summary.
- Pervan, M., Curak, M., & Pavic Kramaric, T. (2018). The influence of industry characteristics and dynamic capabilities on firms’ profitability. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(1), Article 4.
- Poungsuwan, C., Sukhawatthanakun, K., & Sanrach, R. (2024). Confirmatory factor analysis of the adaptation guidelines to technology disruption problems. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 14(2), 139-158.
- Salehi, M., & Alanbari, S. A. (2024). Knowledge sharing barriers and knowledge sharing facilitators in innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(8), 2701-2721.
- Salvato, C., & Vassolo, R. (2018). The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1728-1752.
- Shehzad, M.U., Zhang, J., Dost, M., Ahmad, M.S., & Alam, S. (2024). Knowledge management enablers and knowledge management processes: A direct and configurational approach to stimulate green innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(1), 123-152.
- Singh, D., & Fida B. A. (2015). Technical efficiency and its determinants: An empirical study on banking sector of Oman. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 13(1), 168-175.
- Sitzmann, T., French, K.A., & Fletcher, K.A. (2025). Whose interests should technology serve? Employees versus shareholders. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18(1), 35-39.
- Ştefan, S.C., Popa, I., Olariu, A.A., Popa, Ş.C., & Popa, C.-F. (2024). Knowledge management–performance nexus: Mediating effect of motivation and innovation. Business Process Management Journal, 30(8), 27-48.
- Sukhawatthanakun, K., & Supapon, S. (2024). Agile marketing competency and innovation capability mediating on new product management for industrial business development guidelines. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 15(3), 259-283.
- Sukhawatthanakun, K., Roopsing, T., & Silpcharu, T. (2023). Guidelines for procurement management efficiency in industrial business sectors. International Journal of Procurement Management, 18(2), 170-187.
- Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organising for innovation and growth. Oxford University Press.
- Thailand Development Research Institute. (2016). Labour productivity: Determinants of sustainable income. (In Thai).
- Wang, M., Guo, T., Ni, Y., Shang, S., & Tang, Z. (2019). The effect of spiritual leadership on employee effectiveness: An intrinsic motivation perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2627.
- Yewei, Y., Pereira, R., Jarrar, H., Salloum, C., & Youssef, I. S. (2025). Innovative resource management for strategic entrepreneurship and competitive advantage. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 21(2), 89-104.
- Zabel, C., & O’Brien, D. (2024). Understanding dynamic capabilities in emerging technology markets: Antecedents, sequential nature, and impact on innovation performance in the extended reality industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(9), 305-336.


