Efficiency of the stakeholder interaction in the context of ensuring sustainable territorial development
-
Author(s)Vainius SmalskysLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2980-792X
,
Nataliia GavkalovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1208-9607
,
Kristina BabenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7227-886X
,
Alona ZolenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2599-2830
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.28
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #2, pp. 340-349
- Cited by
- 741 Views
-
88 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The strategic approach to sustainable territorial development precisely assesses all regional disparities. Implementing this approach allows considering the interests and requirements of all stakeholders and identifying priority areas for regional development. A detailed analysis of existing regional development strategies and programs confirms the active region interaction with numerous organizations, groups, and individuals. The growing role of stakeholders in shaping regional policy determines the necessity of the research. Proposed conceptual approach will contribute determining the stakeholders’ interaction effectiveness in ensuring sustainable territorial development. Algorithm for analyzing the stakeholders’ interaction effectiveness was worked out based upon critical analysis of the scientific professionals’ main approaches of identifying and comparing the interests of stakeholders’ sectoral and territorial groups in the context of solving the region existing problems. A feature of the proposed measure scheme of the stakeholder interaction efficiency is the synthesis of quantitative and qualitative assessment of the stakeholder interaction effectiveness using the method of expert assessments, statistical analysis, and fuzzy sets. The practical part of the developed approach to determining the effectiveness of stakeholder interaction allowed to assess the level of regional development programs implementation in the Kharkiv region and to identify the synergistic effect of stakeholder interaction. The made conclusions and recommendations regarding the solution of region existing problems have found practical application in predicting scenarios for the territory development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Н73, O18, R22, R58
-
References31
-
Tables1
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Time focus of a stakeholder analysis by key dimensions
- Figure 2. Methodical approach to measuring the stakeholders’ interaction effectiveness in the context of sustainable territorial development
-
- Table 1. Parameters of a stakeholder interaction evaluation fuzzy system
-
- AccountAbility. (2018). AA1000 Accountability Principles (AA1000AP).
- Anbarasan, P., & Sushil, P. (2018). Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainable Enterprise: Evolving a Conceptual Framework, and a Case Study of ITC. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3), 282-299.
- Bourne, L. (2015). Making Projects Work: Effective Stakeholder and Communication Management (1st ed.) (260 p.). New York: Auerbach Publications.
- Bremmers, H., Omta, O., Kemp, R., & Haverkamp, D.J. (2007). Do stakeholder groups influence environmental management system development in the Dutch agri-food sector? Business Strategy & the Environment, 16(3), 214-231.
- D’Anselmi, P. (2011). Values and Stakeholders in an Era of Social Responsibility (272 p.). New York: Free Press.
- Deloitte. (2018). The 2018 Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends: The rise of social enterprise.
- Edgington, D. W., & Fernandez, A. L. (2001). The changing context of regional development. In New regional development paradigms, 2. New regions – concepts, issues, and practices (Contributions in Economics and Economic History) (pp. 3-20). Westport, London: Greenwood Press.
- Freeman, E. (2010). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gavkalova, N., & Kolupaieva, I. (2018). Decentralization of public administration in the process of building a democratic society. Public Policy and Administration, 17(2), 216-225.
- Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 245-257.
- Gomes, R., & Gomes, L. (2010). Cross-Cultural Analysis of Stakeholder Identification in Municipal Districts: A comparison of Brazil and England. Public Management Review, 12(1), 53-75.
- Harrison, J., & Thompson, S. (2015). Strategic Management of Healthcare Organizations: A Stakeholder Management Approach. NY: Business Expert Press.
- Hatch, M., & Schultz, M. (2010). Toward a Theory of Brand Co-Creation with Implications for Brand Governance. Journal of Brand Management, 17, 590-604.
- Hemmati, М., Dodds, F., Enayti, J., & McHarry, J. (2002). Multistakeholder Procesess for Governance and Sustainability. London: Earthscan.
- Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder – agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131-154.
- Kolodiziev, O., Tyschenko, V., Ostapenko, V., & Kolodizieva, T. (2018). Assessment of the level of development of information and communication infrastructure in the regions of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), 134-144.
- Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152-1189.
- Low, C., & Cowton, C. (2004). Beyond stakeholder engagement: The challenges of stakeholder participation in corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 45-55.
- Mendelow, A. (1991). Stakeholder Mapping’. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems. Cambridge, MA.
- Mendoza, G., & Prabhu, R. (2009). Evaluating multi-stakeholder perceptions of project impacts: a participatory value-based multi-criteria approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecotogy, 16(3), 177-190.
- Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
- Nicholls, A. (2007). The New Social Entrepreneurship. What Awaits Social Entrepreneurial Ventures? Equal Opportunities International, 26(7), 729-732.
- Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2005). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 321-328.
- Parmar, B., Freeman, R., Harrison, J., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, A., & Colle, S. D. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403-445.
- Schmeer, K. (1999). Guidelines for Conducting a Stakeholder Analysis. Abt Associates Inc., Bethesda, MD.
- Sorkin, A. R. (2018). BlackRock’s message: contribute to society, or risk losing our support. New York Times.
- Varvasovszky, Z., & Brugha, R. (2000). Stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338-345.
- Viana, L., Moreira, J., & Alves, P. (2018). Accounting for Public-Private Partnerships. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham.
- World Bank. (2017). The World Bank Annual Report 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
- World Bank. (2018). The World Bank Annual Report 2018. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
- Yu, J., & Leung, M.-Y. (2018). Structural Stakeholder Model in Public Engagement for Construction Development Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(6).
-
The role of accounting in sustainable development
Inna Makarenko ,
Alex Plastun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(2).2017.01
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 4-12 Views: 5672 Downloads: 4307 TO CITEIdeology of Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Goals influence the transformation of business processes in the companies. Professional accountants are important part of this transformation. In this paper the role of accounting in Sustainable Development Goals achievement is discussed. Different approaches to structuring the role of professional accountants in Sustainable Development are investigated. Among them are types of roles that perform accountants, their professional functions, skills and competencies in the corporate environment. As the result a holistic vision of the role of accounting in sustainable development in the new economic conditions is provided.
-
IFRS convergence: opportunities and challenges in India
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 13-18 Views: 2671 Downloads: 1654 TO CITEPast decade has witnessed several changes in the process of conduct of business activities across the world especially due to the wave of globalization. It has also made drastic changes in the process of financial reporting, in particular the continuing adoption of IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) worldwide. IFRS are high quality, understandable, enforceable and globally acceptable accounting standards issued by IASB (International Accounting Standard Board). Thus these are a set of international accounting standards stating how a particular type of transaction and other events should be reported in the financial statements. Thus IFRS are designed as a common global language for business affairs so that company accounts are understandable and comparable across international boundaries. IFRS is becoming the global language of business with over 40% of the world adopting this as their standard for reporting. India also decided to converge to IFRS from 1st April 2016 in a phased manner, which in turn improves the financial statement comparability and transparency that helps to attract greater cross border investments. This paper focuses on the convergence of IFRS with Indian Accounting Standards, its utility, issues and challenges faced by the stakeholders. It also throws light to the ways through which problems can be addressed.
-
Management of relations with enterprise stakeholders based on value approach
Petro Pererva ,
Tetiana Kobielieva ,
Nаdеzhdа Tkасhovа ,
Maxim Tkachov ,
Tetiana Diachenko
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.03
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021 Issue #1 pp. 24-38 Views: 1242 Downloads: 648 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯSignificant transformations in economic relations and increased competition have posed enterprises with extremely complex tasks in the field of corporate governance. Mainly it concerns the systems of corporate governance, in which the principles of vertical organization are losing relevance, and the effectiveness of management largely depends on the balance of interests of participants (stakeholders) who can actively influence the production and commercial policy of the enterprise to distribute its resources in their favor.
The study aims to develop proposals to ensure the effective interaction of the enterprise with stakeholders, based on establishing an optimal balance of material (value) interests, allowing achieving a reduction of risks that threaten the development of the enterprise.
Thus, it was proposed to determine the total value of the commercial results of the enterprise, taking into account the real contribution, which is provided by the relations with one or another stakeholder. A similar approach is implemented to determine the share of the value of the corresponding stakeholder, which is ensured by its relationship with this enterprise. In addition to the value of the enterprise itself, the proposed models explicitly determine the value benefits of stakeholders and disclose a list of the main controlling factors: the volumes of resources supplied and consumed by the parties, their relative values, the structure of resource flows, etc.
As an example, using the developed recommendations, the circle of the most influential stakeholders of the Ukrainian enterprise – PJSC KhTP – was studied. This approach allows an industrial enterprise to rank stakeholders by value, to analyze the dynamics of the structure and parameters of material and financial resources flows of the enterprise and its stakeholders.
