Development of the integrated quality management model for increasing the strategic performance of enterprises in the automotive industry
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(3).2017.01
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2017, Issue #3, pp. 4-15
- Cited by
- 1313 Views
-
189 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Objective pressures to create increasingly complex grouping of supply chain partners have next to their base priority of maintaining competitiveness and possible pitfalls. They are shown by the need to cope with a number of external risks that by participation in the chain inevitably penetrate to the enterprise and at the same time there is a duty to protect the partners from the negative effects of its own risks, as well as the enterprise itself, which threaten the common activities of the supply chain. In a review of the knowledge of the current state of the art we present models and progressive methodological approaches to integrated management and assessment of business performance. The results of our own research are presented, including verification of scientific hypotheses being explored importance of the automotive industry in Slovakia, both for production in the national economy, creation of employment and value added, as well as the effects on import or innovation. It is also defined in terms of international standards. Presented are the results of the empirical effects of the automotive industry in the total production, employment and value added in the national economy. We also deal prospects of development of the automotive industry in Slovakia, both in relation to the competitiveness of the industry itself, as well as in relation to the new industrial policy of Slovakia – Industry 4.0. Supporting part of the paper presents an application of multi-criteria methods for assessing the effectiveness of the research sample based on the DEA modelling, leading to the draft of assessment model of integrated quality management system on the principle of assessing the performance of the enterprise (BSC) and the draft of recommendations for business practice.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C51, C67, L10, L62, M11, O21, O32, L10
-
References15
-
Tables6
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Aims the integration model BSC-DEA
- Figure 2. Model 1. Strategy “Lowest Costs”
- Figure 3. Model 2. Strategy “Innovation”
- Figure 4. Model 3. Strategy “Customer Relationships”
- Figure 5. Strategies for enterprises in the network of suppliers in the automotive industry
-
- Table 1. Different strategies requiring differentiated performance measurement
- Table 2. Frequency by region
- Table 3. Summary results of the regression analysis of the variables of each model
- Table 4. Summary results of Fisher test variables of each model
- Table 5. Summary results of Fisher-Snedecor test criteria of the variables of each model
- Table 6. Characteristics of technical efficiency rates of the observations sets for the BCC DEA model
-
- Asif, M., Bruijn, E.J.D., Fisscher, O.A.M., Searcy, C. (2010). Meta-management of integration of management systems. The TQM Journal, 22(6), 570-582.
- Boiral, O., Gendron, Y. (2011). Managing with ISO systems: lessons from practice. In Long Range Planning, 3, 197-220.
- Campbell, J., Sankaran J. (2005). An inductive framework for enhancing supply chain integration, International Journal of Production Research, 43(16), 15 August.
- Dick, G.P.M., Heras, I., Casadesus, M. (2008). Shedding light on causation between ISO 9001 and improved business performance. In International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28, 687-708.
- Dragomir, M. (2010). Cercetărişi contribuţii privind concepţia, dezvoltarea, implementare aşiimbunătăţirea continuă a sistemelorde management integratal calităţii, mediului şisănătăţiişi securită ţiimunciiinin treprinderile industriale, Universitatea Tehnică, ClujNapoca, 15-18.
- Friedli, T., Mundt, A., Thomas, S. (2014). Strategic Management of Manufacturing Networks. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.
- Horvath & Partners. (2002). Balanced Scorecard v praxi. 1. vyd. Praha : Profess Consulting, 386.
- Kohl, H., Orth, R., Riebartschb, O., Hecklaub, F. (2016). Integrated Evaluation System for the Strategic Management of Innovation Initiatives in Manufacturing Industries. 13th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing – Decoupling Growth from Resource Use.
- Mahesh, N. (2013). Consumer’s Perceived value, Attitude and Purchase Intention of Green Products. Management Insight, 9(1).
- Olaru, M., Pirnea, I. C., Hohan, A., Maftei, M. (2014). Performance indicators used by SMEs in Romania related to integrated management systems. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Journal, 109, 949-953.
- Perrini, F., Tencati, A. (2008). Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 296-308.
- Simon, A. – Karapetrovic, S. – Casadesus, M. (2012). Difficulties and Benefits of Integrated Management Systems. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(5), 828-846.
- SRAC. (2015). Organismul de Certificare a Sistemelor de Management.
- Taticchi, P., Balachandran, K. R. (2008). Forward performance measurement and management integrated frameworks. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 16(2), 140-154.
- The Excitant Fourth Generation Balanced Scoreacard Approach. (2016).