Economic conditions of the functioning and existence of asymmetry in the development of transport services markets of Ukraine

  • Published March 29, 2017
  • Author(s)
    Svitlana Ilchenko
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.09
  • Article Info
    Volume 15 2017, Issue #1, pp. 93-98
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    2 articles
  • 1048 Views
  • 262 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The achievement of the desired level of efficiency in the functioning of the markets of goods and services is possible under the conditions of equilibrium of these processes on the global scale. The paper is focused on the worldwide tendencies in the development of the markets of goods and services, on their disproportional development. The relationship of the received results with the nature of functioning of economic systems and its interaction with the sphere of transport is determined. The article considers the importance of tendencies in the development of the world economic system for Ukraine, the degree of inclusion of transport into the global processes. It identifies the need to consider the asymmetry in the development levels of the markets of goods and transport services on the international and the national scale, assessing the level of deviation from the state of symmetry. It substantiates the necessity in eliminating disproportions depending on the level and type of asymmetries and taking into account the global tendencies.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Fig. 1. Indicators of the level of economic processes asymmetry on the international scale
    • Fig. 2. Indicators of the level of economic processes asymmetry in Ukraine
    • Table 1. Some indicators of development of the world economy, percent change to the previous year
    • Table 2. The main economic characteristics of development in Ukraine
    • Тable 3. Industrial production in Ukraine according to types of activity (several types)
    • Table 4. Indicators of cargo volumes according to the types of transport (% to the previous year)
    • Table 5. Transportation of cargoes according to the types of transport in Ukraine, mln tons
    • Table 6. Export-import indexes of Ukraine
    • Table 7. Analyse results of asymmetry level of researched objects
    • Table 8. Export volumes of the regions of Ukraine, 2014
    • Aleksiiev, V.O. (2008). Upravlinnia rozvytkom transportnykh system (monographiia), Kharkiv, KHNADU, 268 p.
    • Bozhidarnik, N.V. (2005). Rehionalna asymetriia v hlobalnii ekonomitsi (teoretychnyi aspekt), Zb. Naukovukh prats Instytutu svitivoi ekonomiky I mizhnarodnykh vidnosyn NAN Ukrainy, 44. Vidp. Red. V.E. Novytskyi, K. ISEMV NANU, ss. 59-72.
    • Vakhovych, I.M., Lakatosh I.M. (2008). Sutnist asymetrii rehionalnoho rozvytku, Zb. Nauk. pr. “Ekonomichni nauky”, Seriia Ekonomika ta menedgment, 5 (18), ch. 1, Lutsk, ss. 61-66.
    • Hrebenkin, A.S., Skripniuk, D.F. Asimmetriia razvitiia regionov: factory vozniknoveniia I regulirovaniie, Nalogi, Investitsii, Kapital, 1-3, ss. 182-189.
    • Kirillova, E.V. (2011). Transportno-tekhnologicheskiie I logisticheskie sistemy: diskussionnye voprosy terminologii I istoricheskie aspekty razvitiia teorii I praktiki, Metody I zasoby upravlinnia rozvytkom transportnykh system: Zb. Nauk. pr., Odesa: ONMU, 18, ss. 134-153.
    • Kobets, V.M. (2005). Rivnovaha lohistychnoi systemy pry horyzontalnii intehratsii v umovakh informatsiinoi asymetrii, Metody ta zasoby upravlinnia rozvytkom transportnykh system: Zb. Nauk. pr., 9, Odesa, ss. 83-101.
    • Kolchkov, V.A. (2012). Sotsialno-ekonomichni asymetrii rehionalnoho rozvytku Ukrainy (sutnist I shliakhy podolannia), Visnyk universytetu bankivskoi spravy NBU, Kyiv, 1 (13), s. 14.
    • Minakir, P.A. (2008). Mnimye I realnye disproportsii ekonomicheskoho prostranstva, Prostranstvennaia ekonomika, 4, ss. 5-18.
    • Naumenko, Zh. (2012). Disproportsii regionalnogo razvitia: opredelenie disproportsii I metody po ikh opredeleniiu, Ekonomichni innovatsii, 50, ss. 281-291.
    • Primachev, N.T. (2009). Usloviia realizatsii morskogo transportnogo potentsiala strany, Ekonomichni innovatsii, 39, Odessa, 2009, ss. 43-50.
    • Pshinko, A.N., Miamlin, V.V., Miamlin, S.V. (2011). Povysheniie urovnia sistemnosti ekonomiki – osnovnoi put vykhoda iz krizisa. Nauka ta progress transport, Visnyk Dnipropetrovskogo natsionalnogo universytetu zaliznychnogo transport im. Akad, V.Lazariana, 36, ss. 375-283.
    • Miiusov, M.V., Primachev, N.T., Vinnikov, V.V., Vinnikov, S.V., Primacheva, N.N. (2006). Strategiia pozitsionirovaniia transportnogo potentsiala v globalnom rynke morskoi torgovli, Odessa, Avtograf, 234 s.
    • Tabalova, O.E., Vakhovich, I.M. (2013). Rehionalni asymetrii staloho rozvytku Ukrainy: diahnostyka ta mekhanizmy vyrivniuvannia: (Monohrafiia), Lutsk: Drukarnia “Volynpoligraf” TM, 344 s.
    • Transport I zvyazok Ukrainy u 2014. Statystychnyi zbirnyk, K. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy, 204 s.
    • Transport I zvyazok Ukrainy u 2015. Statystychnyi zbirnyk, K. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy, 186 s.
    • Ukraina u tsyfrakh 2015. Statystychnyi zbirnyk. K. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy, 2016, 238 s.
    • Khassuna, B. (2012). Otsenki asimetrii innovatsionnogo razvitiia Evropeiskogo Soiuza, Naukovyi visnyk Poltavskoho universytetu ekonomiky I torhivli, 2 (53), ss. 54-58.
    • Shirov, A.A., Yantovslii, A.A. (2008). Soglasovaniie otraslevykh strategii kak element kompleksnogo narodokhoziaistvennogo prognoza (na primere elektroenergetiki I zheleznodorozhnogo transporta), Problemy prognozirovaniia: nauch. Zhurnal, M., 5, ss. 20-36.
    • Grain Market Report (2016). International Grain Council, Great Britain, 57 p.
    • Trade and development report. (2015). United Nations, New York and Geneva, 222 p.
    • World Economic Outlook. (2016). Too Slow For Too Long. International Monetary Fund, Washington, 243 p.
Related Articles

  • Efficiency of the intra-EU trade in goods and services: Geographical and product structure analysis

    Athina DitsiouORCID , Evangelos SiskosORCID , Konstantia DarvidouORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.59
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 21, 2023         Issue #2         pp. 653-666 Views: 254 Downloads: 118 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Economic integration facilitated international trade within the EU with overall benefits for its economy. However, the importance of intra-EU trade varies by country and industry. This paper aims to estimate the efficiency of the intra-EU trade for particular Member States and economic sectors. The trade efficiency of the Member States is measured with the net export index and the difference in export and import growth. Correlation and regression analysis is used to assess sector-specific effects. The results show that South European Member States perform better in the efficiency of intra-EU services trade and worse in merchandise trade, but the difference is decreasing. Western European countries tend to have medium efficiency of services trade and stability in the efficiency of merchandise trade. North European countries are likely to have less than average trade efficiency and no major changes in it. Central European countries perform better than average and have an upward trend in merchandise trade efficiency. Ireland, Poland, Czechia, Slovenia, and Bulgaria have the best performance in the total intra-EU trade. The EU has a well-diversified intra-bloc trade with the domination of manufactured goods. The elasticity of value added to exports is the highest for apparel, automotive industries, agriculture, and travel services (0.8-1.2). Other sectors have lower elasticities: 0.3-0.7 (goods) or 0.4-0.6 (services). Export demand has little effect on the food industry, fuel industry, construction, and insurance sectors. The negative correlation in financial services was a prominent exception among industries.

Download Preview
Close
Problems and Perspectives in Management
Problems and Perspectives in Management