Remote audit as a moderator of the relationship between auditor digital competence, IT support, and audit quality
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.07(2).2026.07
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2026, Issue #2, pp. 104-122
- 13 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
The rapid shift toward remote auditing since the COVID-19 pandemic has made auditor digital competence and organizational information technology (IT) support decisive factors for sustaining audit quality, yet empirical evidence on how remote audit conditions shape these relationships remains limited. This study aims to examine the effects of auditor digital competence and IT support on audit quality and to test whether remote audit moderates these two relationships. A quantitative explanatory approach was used, applying Partial Least Squares – Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS on data from 160 external auditors working at Big Four-affiliated public accounting firms operating in Malang City, Indonesia, selected through purposive sampling. The results show that auditor digital competence (β = 0.267; t = 3.374; p = 0.001) and IT support (β = 0.889; t = 3.134; p = 0.002) both have a positive and significant effect on audit quality (R2 = 0.414). Remote audit significantly strengthens the effect of auditor digital competence on audit quality (β = 0.148; t = 2.020; p = 0.045), but does not significantly moderate the effect of IT support on audit quality (β = 0.061; t = 0.925; p = 0.357). These findings indicate that auditor digital competence becomes increasingly critical for audit quality as audits move to remote settings, while the contribution of IT support remains consistently strong regardless of audit mode, offering practical implications for digital audit training and IT infrastructure policy in public accounting firms.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of facilities and infrastructure from the LPPM Universitas Gajayana during the research process. We also extend our appreciation to the Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gajayana, for the institutional support and facilities that facilitated the completion of this research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M42, M15, G32
-
References50
-
Tables7
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Structural model (SEM) results
- Figure 2. Simple slope plot of Auditor Digital Competency (ADC) on Audit Quality at low, mean, and high levels of Remote Audit (RA)
- Figure 3. Simple slope plot of Information Technology Support (ITS) on Audit Quality at low, mean, and high levels of Remote Audit (RA)
-
- Table 1. Respondent demographics
- Table 2. Cross loadings
- Table 3. Construct reliability and validity
- Table 4. HTMT results
- Table 5. Inner VIF value
- Table 6. R2, Q2, and f2
- Table 7. Hypotheses testing
-
- Ahmad, A. Y. A. B., Atta, A. A. M. B., Alawawdeh, H. A., Aljundi, N. A., Morshed, A., Dahbour, S. A., & Alqaraleh, M. H. (2023). The effect of system quality and user quality of information technology on internal audit effectiveness in Jordan, and the moderating effect of management support. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 17(5), 859-866.
- Al-Hajaya, K., Alma’aitah, R. T., Salem, R. I. A., & Hutaibat, K. (2025). Understanding challenges of conventional remote auditing and AI-enabled remote IT auditing: Audit professionals’ perspectives from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. Advance online publication.
- Alma’aitah, R. T., Al-Hajaya, K., Sawan, N., & Alzeban, A. (2024). The impact of remote auditing on audit quality: The moderating role of technology readiness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(6), 624-647.
- Alqudah, H., Mansour, A. A. Z., Rawashdeh, B. S., Lutfi, A., Al Barrak, T., Almaiah, M. A., & Alrawad, M. (2024). Enhancing the internal auditors’ effectiveness in Jordanian companies: The impact of cloud-based accounting usage and the moderating role of digital proficiency. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, 100442.
- Alsughayer, S. A. (2021). Impact of auditor competence, integrity, and ethics on audit quality in Saudi Arabia. Open Journal of Accounting, 10(4), 125-140
- Ambrogio, G., Filice, L., Longo, F., & Padovano, A. (2022). Workforce and supply chain disruption as a digital and technological innovation opportunity for resilient manufacturing systems in the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 169, 108158.
- Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650.
- Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Li, J. Z., Jiang, H., Bajary, A. R., & Ma’aji, M. M. (2025). Does AI adoption redefine financial reporting accuracy, auditing efficiency, and information asymmetry? An integrated model of TOE-TAM-RDT and big data governance. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, 100572.
- Brazel, J. F., Agoglia, C. P., & Hatfield, R. C. (2004). Electronic versus face-to-face review: The effects of alternative forms of review on auditors’ performance. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 949-966.
- Cebi, S., Karakurt, N. F., Kurtulus, E., & Tokgoz, B. (2024). Development of a decision support system for client acceptance in independent audit process. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 53, 100683.
- Crucean, A. C., & Hategan, C.-D. (2023). Impact of information technology on audit quality: European listed companies’ evidence. In S. Grima, K. Sood, & E. Özen (Eds.), Contemporary studies of risks in emerging technology, Part B. Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Darmawan, A. (2023). Audit quality and its impact on financial reporting transparency. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 3(1), 32-45.
- DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
- Eulerich, M., Masli, A., Pickerd, J., & Wood, D. A. (2023). The impact of audit technology on audit task outcomes: Evidence for technology-based audit techniques. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2), 981-1012.
- Farcane, N., Bunget, O. C., Blidisel, R., Dumitrescu, A. C., Deliu, D., Bogdan, O., & Burca, V. (2023). Auditors’ perceptions on work adaptability in remote audit: A COVID-19 perspective. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 422-459.
- Feliciano, C., & Quick, R. (2022). Innovative information technology in auditing: Auditors’ perceptions of future importance and current auditor expertise. Accounting in Europe, 19(2), 311-331.
- Furiady, O., & Kurnia, R. (2015). The effect of work experiences, competency, motivation, accountability and objectivity towards audit quality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 328-335.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Hasibuan, D. H. M., Amyar, F., & Hidayah, N. N. (2022). Government audit quality: Audit expectation-performance gap. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 22(23), 373-386.
- Herdiana, K., & Nugrahanti, T. P. (2025). Digital audit technologies in accounting information systems: A systematic literature review of contemporary trends and professional implications. UTSAHA: Journal of Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 87-101.
- Hossain, S. (2025). The impact of emerging technology on the role of auditors in reshaping the future of audit. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 13(4), 37-58.
- Hubais, A. S. A., Kadir, M. R. A., & Bilal, Z. O. (2023). The impact of auditor’s independence, ethics, and competency in audit quality: Using auditor’s integrity as a mediator in the Sultanate of Oman. WSEAS Transactions on Computer Research, 11, 440-449.
- Irman, M., Suhendra, E. A., & Diana, H. (2021). Work experience, professionalism, independence and the application of information technology on auditor performance in order to increasing audit quality at the Financial Audit Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Representative of the Riau Province. Journal of Applied Business and Technology, 2(3), 206-222.
- Ismanidar, N., Maksum, A., Gultom, P., & Meutia, R. (2025). Auditor competence, remote audit support, digital-based governance, information technology, audit quality: An empirical study in state financial audit. Quality - Access to Success, 26(207), 232-239.
- Junaid, A., Haeruddin, S. H., & Sari, N. W. (2021). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, dan teknologi informasi terhadap kualitas audit pada masa pandemi Covid-19 [The effect of competence, independence, and information technology on audit quality during the Covid-19 pandemic]. YUME: Journal of Management, 4(3), 536-550. (In Indonesian).
- Khalil, A. L. B., & Nafti, O. (2020). Factors that influence the adoption of computer assisted audit techniques (CAATs) by external auditors in Yemen. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 10(2), 1-23.
- Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2007). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. Pearson Educación.
- Leng, A., & Zhang, Y. (2024). The effect of enterprise digital transformation on audit efficiency – Evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123215.
- Leocádio, D., Malheiro, L., & Reis, J. C. G. (2024). Auditors in the digital age: A systematic literature review. Digital Transformation and Society, 4(1), 5-20.
- Li, Y., Goel, S., & Williams, K. (2023). Impact of remote audit on audit quality, audit efficiency, and auditors’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Auditing, 27(2-3), 130-149.
- Liao, L., Sharma, D. S., Sharma, V. D., & Singh, M. K. (2025). The role of IT infrastructure in remote audits: Evidence from audits completed during the pandemic. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 45(2), 121-150.
- Lisa, O., Muzaqi, M. K., Rahman, M. A., & Farhan, D. (2025). Role of green audit in improving financial performance and sustainability sharia cooperatives in the green economy era. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(3), 2391-2403.
- Lorentzon, J. I., Fotoh, L. E., & Mugwira, T. (2023). Remote auditing and its impacts on auditors’ work and work-life balance: Auditors’ perceptions and implications. Accounting Research Journal, 37(1), 1-18.
- Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020). The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119751.
- Nurharjanti, N. N. (2024). Auditor competence in digital-based government organizations: Systematic literature review. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 24(1), 65-82.
- Nusa, I. B. S. (2019). Quality of audit system information for internal control effectiveness. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business, Economic, Social Science, and Humanities – Economics, Business and Management Track (ICOBEST-EBM 2019) Vol. 112, pp. 198-202). Atlantis Press.
- Otia, J. E., & Bracci, E. (2022). Digital transformation and the public sector auditing: The SAI’s perspective. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(2), 252-280.
- Rahmani, H. F., Inayah, A. K., Septiani, D. H., Ginoga, L. F., & Rosyanti, N. (2025). Linking auditor competence and remote support to audit quality: The mediating role of IT. Assets: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan, 14(1), 1-14.
- Razali, F. M., Sulaiman, N., Manan, D. I. A., & Said, J. (2025). Sustainability of audit profession in digital technology era: The role of competencies and digital technology capabilities to detect fraud risk. SAGE Open, 15(1), 21582440241304974.
- Rezaee, Z., Sharbatoghlie, A., Elam, R., & McMickle, P. L. (2002). Continuous auditing: Building automated auditing capability. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 147-163.
- Ridzuan, N. I. M., Said, J., Razali, F. M., & Sulaiman, N. (2022). Examining the role of personality traits, digital technology skills and competency on the effectiveness of fraud risk assessment among external auditors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(11), 536.
- Sewpersadh, N. S. (2025). Adaptive structural audit processes as shaped by emerging technologies. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56, 100735.
- Stoel, M. D., & Havelka, D. (2021). Information technology audit quality: An investigation of the impact of individual and organizational factors. Journal of Information Systems, 35(1), 135-154.
- Sundarasen, S., Kamaludin, K., & Nakiran, D. (2026). From adoption to audit quality: Mapping the intellectual structure of artificial intelligence-enabled auditing. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(3), 209.
- Suyono, W. P., Nindito, M., Handarini, D., Khairunnisa, H., Puspa, E. S., Anugrah, S., Sudiati, R., Firnanda, R., Hermawan, S., & Nurmalita, S. (2026). Advancing audit effectiveness through AI-driven digital audits and auditor competency: The moderating role of technological infrastructure. In A. Iglesias, J. Shin, N. Bhatt, & A. Joshi (Eds.), Information systems for intelligent systems (pp. 280-289). Springer Nature Switzerland.
- Syam, M. A., Djaddang, S., Hasnawati, Roziq, M., & Harnovinsah. (2025). The digital transformation of auditing: Navigating the challenges and opportunities. Journal of Economics and Business, 8(2), 49-66.
- Utama, I. W., & Anridho, N. (2024). The impact of IT governance on audit outcomes and footnote readability for public companies in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 28(1), 63-76.
- Velte, P. (2022). The impact of external auditors on firms’ financial restatements: A review of archival studies and implications for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 73(3), 959-985.
- Vitali, S., & Giuliani, M. (2024). Emerging digital technologies and auditing firms: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 53, 100676.
- Yeghaneh, Y. H., Zangiabadi, M., & Firozabadi, S. M. D. (2015). Factors affecting information technology audit quality. Journal of Investment and Management, 4(5), 196-203.


