Responsibility accounting and decentralized financial control: A bibliometric mapping of intellectual structure and research trajectories
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.07(1).2026.10
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2026, Issue #1, pp. 116-127
- 20 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
This paper examines the intellectual framework and research trends in responsibility accounting and decentralized financial control. A bibliometric method is employed to analyze a final sample of 260 documents, selected from a pool of 561 documents retrieved from the Scopus database through defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, covering the study period from 1964 to 2025. The review employs various bibliometric tools and techniques, including citation analysis, most relevant authors, most relevant sources (journals), etc. The thematic pattern analysis is also undertaken to find out the intellectual structure, theoretical development, and research trajectories. The results indicate a steady annual growth rate of 4.75%, with an average citations per document of 22.1, reflecting sustained growth in research output and academic discourse. A marked post-2010 surge is driven by international collaboration (19.23%), with China leading the implementation of these concepts. Overall, the study identifies emerging research directions and offers valuable insights for academia, industry, and policymakers.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, M40, Q56
-
References46
-
Tables3
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Selection and screening of documents
- Figure 2. Annual productions/publications
- Figure 3. Authors’ publications over time
- Figure 4. Trending topics
- Figure 5. Bradford’s law
- Figure 6. Three-field plot
- Figure 7. Thematic map
- Figure 8. Life cycle – annual publications
-
- Table 1. Main Information
- Table 2. Most relevant authors
- Table 3. Most relevant sources
-
- Abernethy, M. A., & Lillis, A. M. (1995). The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(4), 241-258.
- Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Lucking, B., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2021). Turbulence, firm decentralization, and growth in bad times. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 13(1), 133-169.
- Aljanabi, A. K., & Nouri, M. A. (2020). Responsible accounting and its role in achieving competitive advantage. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(11), 577-611.
- Anthony, R. (1965). Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
- Anthony, R., Govindarajan, V., Hartmann, F., Kraus, K., & Nillson, G. (2014). Management Control Systems (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Antle, R., & Demski, J. S. (1988). The controllability principle in responsibility accounting. The Accounting Review, 63(4), 700-718.
- Bai, L., Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Shao, K., & Luo, X. (2025). Unlocking the potential of project portfolio: value-oriented interactive risk management. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1).
- Baiman, S., & Noel, J. (1985). Noncontrollable costs and responsibility accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 486-501.
- Biswas, T. (2017). Responsibility accounting: A review of related literature. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 4(8), 202-206.
- Bulloch, J. (1964). Responsibility accounting – A results-oriented appraisal system. Human Resource Management, 2(4), 25-31.
- Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 127-168.
- Chinyere, A. N. L., Ijeoma, O. P., & Elom, J. O. (2025). Revisiting responsibility accounting as a performance control framework in decentralized organizations: An empirical perspective. Journal of Accounting and Contemporary Studies, 3(1), 201-211.
- Choudhury, N. (1986). Responsibility accounting and controllability. Accounting and Business Research, 16(63), 189-198.
- Cohen, J. R., Fehrenbacher, D. D., Schulz, A., & Weisner, M. (2023). The influence of controllability and outcome valence on cost-shifting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 36(1), 55-71.
- Dessein, W., Lo, D., & Minami, C. (2022). Coordination and organization design: Theory and micro-evidence. American Economic Journal Microeconomics, 14(4), 804-843.
- Drury, C. M. (2013). Management and cost accounting (8th ed.). Springer.
- Dunk, A. S. (1993). The effects of job-related tension on managerial performance in participative budgetary settings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(7-8), 575-585.
- Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263-282.
- Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., & Bourne, M. (2012). Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research. Management Accounting Research, 23(2), 79-119.
- Hiebl, M. R. W. (2024). The integration of risk into management control systems: Towards a deeper understanding across multiple levels of analysis. Journal of Management Control, 35(1), 1-16.
- Hofmann, C., & Indjejikian, R. J. (2021). Authority, monitoring, and incentives in hierarchies. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1643-1678.
- Horngren, C. T., Foster, G., Datar, S. M., Rajan, M., Ittner, C., & Baldwin, A. A. (2010). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 789-790.
- Indjejikian, R., & Matejka, M. (2006). Organizational slack in decentralized firms: the role of business unit controllers. The Accounting Review, 81(4), 849-872.
- Jensen, M. C. (2004). The agency costs of overvalued equity and the current state of corporate finance. European Financial Management, 10(4), 549-565.
- Jones, L., & Thompson, F. (2000). Responsibility budgeting and accounting. International Public Management Journal, 3(2), 205-227.
- Jun Lin, Z., & Yu, Z. (2002). Responsibility cost control system in China: A case of management accounting application. Management Accounting Research, 13(4), 447-467.
- Khajehpour, H., Saboohi, Y., & Tsatsaronis, G. (2017). Environmental responsibility accounting in complex energy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 998-1009.
- Lau, C. M., & Moser, A. (2008). Behavioral effects of nonfinancial performance measures: The role of procedural fairness. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(2), 55-71.
- Li, J., & Zhang, X. (2025). Digital transformation and the choice of management control modes in enterprise groups. PLoS ONE, 20(4).
- Liu, S., Ji, M., & Wang, H. (2020). Decentralization and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China. Economic Modelling, 94, 501-512.
- Maas, V. S., & Van Rinsum, M. (2013). How control system design influences performance misreporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(5), 1159-1186.
- Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287-300.
- McNally, G. M. (1980). Responsibility accounting and organisational control: Some perspectives and prospects. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 7(2), 165-181.
- Melumad, N. D., Mookherjee, D., & Reichelstein, S. (1992). A theory of responsibility centers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(4), 445-484.
- Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980–2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45-62.
- Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382.
- Phan, T., Baird, K., Bhuyan, M., & Tung, A. (2023). The associations between management control systems, organisational capabilities and performance. Journal of Management Control, 34(4), 435-462.
- Quesado, P. R., Silva, R., & Oliveira, H. C. (2024). Management control systems and sustainability: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 16(12), 5067.
- Reineke, P., Katila, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2025). Decentralization in organizations: A revolution or a mirage? Academy of Management Annals, 19(1), 298-342.
- Richardson, H. A., Vandenberg, R. J., Blum, T. C., & Roman, P. M. (2002). Does decentralization make a difference for the organization? An examination of the boundary conditions circumscribing decentralized decision-making and organizational financial performance. Journal of Management, 28(2), 217-244.
- Shekarabi, S. A. H., Mavi, R. K., & Macau, F. R. (2025). Supply chain resilience: A critical review of risk mitigation, robust optimisation, and technological solutions and future research directions. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 26(3), 681-735.
- Sokolov, A. Y., & Bikmukhametova, C. Z. (2015). Cost accounting in Russia: Historical aspects. Asian Social Science, 11(11).
- Tavares, M. da C., Vale, J., & Costa, A. (2024). The role of decentralised managers in decision-making in a large industrial company. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 202.
- Tawse, A., & Tabesh, P. (2022). Thirty years with the balanced scorecard: What we have learned. Business Horizons, 66(1), 123-132.
- Tuan, T. T. (2017). Application responsibility accounting to sustainable development in Vietnam manufacturers: An empirical study. Economics World, 5(6).
- Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 757-788.


