Financial reporting frameworks and distress prediction models in SME auditing: Evidence from the Visegrad Four countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.07(1).2026.11
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2026, Issue #1, pp. 128-143
- 13 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Although financial reporting and auditing standards are substantially harmonized across the European Union, important differences remain in national accounting regulations, audit thresholds, and the practical application of the going concern principle. These differences are particularly relevant for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which constitute the dominant segment of the Visegrad Four (V4) economies. This paper examines differences in financial reporting and auditing frameworks among the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia and develops sector-specific distress prediction models to support going-concern assessments in SME auditing.
The empirical analysis is based on financial statement data for 66,988 active firms obtained from the Orbis database. After data cleaning and consistency checks, a modelling sample of approximately 41,000 SMEs was constructed. Financial distress is defined as a persistent inability to cover interest obligations, represented by two consecutive years in which earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) are lower than interest expenses. Distress status is modelled using financial ratios, firm-size indicators, industry characteristics, and selected variables inspired by ISA 570. Separate binomial logistic regression models are estimated for country–industry groups derived from NACE classifications and evaluated using hold-out samples.
The results confirm that country- and sector-specific models achieve satisfactory predictive performance and provide useful support for assessing going-concern risks. The results also show that the most informative predictors differ across countries and industries, reflecting differences in regulatory environments and economic structures. The study highlights the importance of local calibration when developing distress prediction models and demonstrates that a universal approach may lead to reduced predictive accuracy. The proposed models provide a practical screening tool for auditors, lenders, and SME managers, complementing professional judgement and broader audit procedures.
Acknowledgments
This study is co-financed by the governments of Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia through Visegrad Grants from the International Visegrad Fund. Visegrad Grant No. 22420285, Title of the project: “Distress prediction models in V4 countries and their audit applicability”. The mission of the Fund is to advance ideas for sustainable regional cooperation in Central Europe. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of their home institutions and thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G33, M41, M42
-
References40
-
Tables10
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. List of potential predictors of distress of SMEs operating in V4 countries applied in own research
- Table 2. Grouping the industry categories using the CART approach
- Table 3. Cox-Snell pseudo R2 results
- Table 4. Regression results – CZ models
- Table 5. Regression results – SK models
- Table 6. Regression results – PL models
- Table 7. Regression results – HU models
- Table 8. ROC testing results (AUC values)
- Table 9. Youden’s J statistic and optimal cutoff
- Table 10. True positive and true negative rates
-
- Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609
- Ayagi, S. R., & Salisu, M. (2023). Financial reporting quality and information asymmetry: A review of empirical literature. Federal University Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 1(3), 19-29.
- Balcaen, S., & Ooghe, H. (2006). 35 years of studies on business failure: An overview of the classic statistical methodologies and their related problems. The British Accounting Review, 38(1), 63-93.
- Bellovary, J. L., Giacomino, D. E., & Akers, M. D. (2007a). A review of bankruptcy prediction studies: 1930 to present. Journal of Financial Education, 1(1), 3-41.
- Bellovary, J. L., Giacomino, D. E., & Akers, M. D. (2007b). A review of going concern prediction studies: 1976 to present. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 5(5).
- Bosman, T. (2025). Accountability under pressure: Auditor going concern reporting and bankruptcy in the Netherlands. Maandblad voor Accountancy en Bedrijfseconomie, 99(6), 353-364.
- Dimitras, A. I., Zanakis, S. H., & Zopounidis, C. (1996). A survey of business failures with an emphasis on prediction methods and industrial applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), 487-513.
- Du Jardin, P. (2009). Bankruptcy prediction models: How to choose the most relevant variables? (MPRA Paper No. 44380). Edhec Business School.
- Filatova, H., Kulyk, V., & Kravchenko, O. (2024). Optimization of a company’s capital structure based on the criterion of minimizing the level of financial risk. Accounting and Financial Control, 5(1), 46-56
- Gulyás, É., & Papp, Á. (2024). Bankruptcy models in auditing: Case studies from the Hungarian financial sector. Magyar Tudomány, 185(2), 222-235.
- International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2024). International Standard on Auditing 570 (Revised 2024): Going concern.
- Jones, S. (2023). A literature survey of corporate failure prediction models. Journal of Accounting Literature, 45(2), 364-405.
- Klieštik, T., Valaskova, K., Lazaroiu, G., Kovacova, M., & Vrbka, J. (2020). Remaining Financially Healthy and Competitive: The Role of Financial Predictors. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(1), 74-92.
- Klieštik, T., Vrbka, J., & Rowland, Z. (2018). Bankruptcy prediction in Visegrad Group countries using multiple discriminant analysis. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(3), 569-593.
- Kotaskova, A., Lazanyi, K., Amoah, J., & Belas, J. (2020). Financial risk management in the V4 countries’ SMEs segment. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(4), 228-240.
- Kovacova, M., Kliestik, T., Valaskova, K., Durana, P., & Juhaszova, Z. (2019). Systematic review of variables applied in bankruptcy prediction models of Visegrad group countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(4), 743-772.
- Legislation of Poland. (1994). Ustawa z dnia 29 września 1994 r. o rachunkowości [Act of 29 September 1994 on accounting]. (In Polish).
- Legislation of the Czech Republic. (1991). Zákon č. 563/1991 Sb., o účetnictví [Act No. 563/1991 Coll., on accounting]. (In Czech). Zákon pro LiDi.
- Legislation of the Hungarian. (2000). Act C of 2000 on Accounting.
- Legislation of the Slovak Republic. (2015). Act No. 423/2015 Coll. on Statutory Audit.
- Legislation of the Slovak Republic. (2018). Slovak Accounting Act No. 431/2002 Z. z. Slov-Lex. (In Slovak).
- Lőrinczová, E. (2021). Comparison of financial reporting in the Visegrad Four countries in a global environment. In SHS Web of Conferences: The 20th International Scientific Conference Globalization and its Socio-Economic Consequences 2020 (Vol. 92, Article 02039).
- Michalkova, L., Kovacova, M., Cepel, M., & Belas, J. (2022). Insolvency prediction and corporate bankruptcy model in Visegrad Group countries. Transformations in Business & Economics, 21(2A[56A]), 529-548.
- Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131.
- Papík, M., Papíková, L., Kajanová, J., & Bečka, M. (2023). CatBoost: The case of bankruptcy prediction. In B. Alareeni & A. Hamdan (Eds.), Sustainable finance, digitalization and the role of technology. ICBT 2021 (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 487). Springer.
- Paquette, L. R., & Skender, C. J. (1996). Using a bankruptcy model in the auditing course: The evaluation of a company as a going concern. Journal of Accounting Education, 14(3), 319-329.
- Pavlíčko, M., Durica, M., & Mazanec, J. (2021). Ensemble model of the financial distress prediction in Visegrad Group countries. Mathematics, 9(16), Article 1886.
- Polska Izba Biegłych Rewidentów (PIBR). (2019). Krajowy Standard Badania 570 (Z) w brzmieniu Międzynarodowego Standardu Badania 570 (Zmienionego) – Kontynuacja działalności [National Standard on Auditing 570 (Z) as amended by International Standard on Auditing 570 (Revised) – Going Concern]. (In Polish).
- Prusak, B., & Karas, M. (2024). Bankruptcy prediction in Visegrad Group countries. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 30(1), 268-288.
- Ptak-Chmielewska, A. (2021). Bankruptcy prediction of small- and medium-sized enterprises in Poland based on the LDA and SVM methods. Statistics in Transition new series, 22(1), 179-195.
- Režňáková, M., & Karas, M. (2014). Identifying bankruptcy prediction factors in various environments: A contribution to the discussion on the transferability of bankruptcy models. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 8, 69-74.
- Režňáková, M., Pěta, J., Šebestová, M., & Dostál, P. (2025). SME bankruptcy prediction using convolutional neural networks. Inzinerine Ekonomika – Engineering Economics, 36(5), 628-642.
- Svabova, L., Durica, M., & Valaskova, K. (2022). Failure prediction models for Slovak small companies. European Journal of International Management, 18(4), 617-637.
- Svabova, L., Michalkova, L., Durica, M., & Nica, E. (2020). Business failure prediction for Slovak small and medium-sized companies. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 4572.
- Tinoco, M. H., & Wilson, N. (2013). Financial distress and bankruptcy prediction among listed companies using accounting, market and macroeconomic variables. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 394-419.
- Tomczak, S. K. (2023). General bankruptcy prediction models for the Visegrád Group: The stability over time. Operations Research and Decisions, 33(4), 171-187.
- Valaskova, K., Durana, P., Adamko, P., & Jaros, J. (2020). Financial compass for Slovak enterprises: Modeling economic stability of agricultural entities. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(5), 92.
- Valaskova, K., Gajdosikova, D., & Belas, J. (2023). Bankruptcy prediction in the post-pandemic period: A case study of Visegrad Group countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 253-293.
- Veganzones, D., & Severin, E. (2021). Corporate failure prediction models in the twenty-first century: A review. European Business Review, 33(2), 204-226.
- Wilson, N., Ochotnický, P., & Káčer, M. (2016). Creation and destruction in transition economies: The SME sector in Slovakia. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 579-600.


