Digitalization of tax and customs administration and the oversight of public-private partnership contracts: Cross-country evidence and Kazakhstan’s special-purpose audit context
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.23(3).2026.38
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2026, Issue #3, pp. 567–591
- 21 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Public-private partnerships are a principal vehicle for infrastructure finance, yet their institutional correlates are poorly measured. This study examines how tax and customs digitalization and the oversight of PPP contracts relate to PPP deal flow, with Kazakhstan as a case. Customs digitalization is measured by WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement commitments and realized implementation in the UN survey, tax digitalization by electronic filing and payment rates, and oversight by contract-management and supreme-audit scores. Poisson and staggered-adoption models use 359 observations across 83 low- and middle-income economies (2020–2024), larger and more PPP-active than the 50 excluded, and 803 across 81 WTO members (2015–2024). Legal commitments to digital customs procedures show no association with financial closures, nor do electronic tax filing and payment. Realized implementation of electronic duty payment is associated with about 0.4 log points more closures per level; the two-year lead is insignificant, and the estimate loses significance without China, India, and Brazil. The three customs measures thus distinguish perceived trade-logistics performance, formal commitment, and realized transactional implementation. Contract-management regulatory quality (β = 0.023, p < 0.01) is associated with closures through accounting for PPP liabilities and the presence of a regulator, whereas post-project audit and supreme-audit oversight are not. In Kazakhstan, customs digitalization was complete by 2019, the 2021 amendments followed the national audit of PPP obligations, and termination rates differ across regions, not cohorts. State audit of budget execution reaches PPP obligations directly, whereas special-purpose audit applies only where the state partner is a quasi-public entity.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G31, H54, H83, L33
-
References93
-
Tables12
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Standardized coefficients from the preferred count model (Poisson, year fixed effects; ±95% confidence intervals)
- Figure 2. Kazakhstan PPP projects and investment by contract-signing year, 2015–2025
- Figure 3. Kazakhstan PPP registry. Contracts signed by year in Almaty region and in the other regions (registry as of 1 April 2026)
- Figure 4. Kazakhstan. Digital-government and PPP-oversight trajectories, 2016–2025
- Figure D1. Kazakhstan PPP registry: terminations per 100 project-years by signing cohort (points, 95% confidence intervals) and raw share terminated (bars)
-
- Table 1. Variables, definitions and sources
- Table 2. Preferred specification: PPP project count (Poisson)
- Table 3. Legal commitments under the Trade Facilitation Agreement and PPP project count, 2015–2024
- Table 4. Realized implementation of digital customs procedures (UN survey scores) and PPP project count, 2015–2024
- Table 5. Question-level oversight and audit items of the BID survey and PPP outcomes, 2020–2024
- Table A1. Economies in the estimation sample (preferred specification, 2020–2024)
- Table A2. Economies in the preferred sample and economies of the PPI universe excluded by missing data, 2020–2024 means
- Table B1. Descriptive statistics, 133 low- and middle-income economies, 2020–2024
- Table B2. Correlation matrix of analysis variables (2020–2024)
- Table C1. Identification and sample checks for the preferred count specification (dependent variable: PPP project count)
- Table D1. Kazakhstan PPP registry. Exposure-adjusted termination rates by region under a constant-hazard assumption
- Table D2. Kazakhstan PPP registry: termination rates by signing cohort, adjusted for exposure under a constant-hazard assumption
-
- Abzhalelova, S., Ruziyeva, E., Kalkabayeva, G., Tyan, O., & Kurmanalina, A. (2025). Financial monitoring effectiveness in Kazakhstan's bank investment operations: A mixed-methods evaluation. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(4), 276-292.
- Aleksandravičienė, A., Butkus, M., & Kadiša, T. (2024). Assessing the effect of trade and FDI on growth-unemployment nexus. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(1), 59-91.
- Asian Development Bank, Inter-American Center of Tax Administrations, International Monetary Fund, Intra-European Organisation of Tax Administrations, & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). International Survey on Revenue Administration (ISORA) [Data set]. IMF Data Portal.
- Asian Development Bank. (2022). Public-private partnership monitor: Kazakhstan. Asian Development Bank.
- Bellon, M., Dabla-Norris, E., Khalid, S., & Lima, F. (2022). Digitalization to improve tax compliance: Evidence from VAT e-invoicing in Peru. Journal of Public Economics, 210, 104661.
- Berkane, I., Mattoug, D., Bobah, A., & Benelmouffok, S. (2025). Entrepreneurial Project Financing: Challengers and Opportunities for Economic Growth. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(1), 233-251.
- Bezverkhyi, K., Hnylytska, L., Yurchenko, O., & Poddubna, N. (2023). Analytical procedures of the audit of integrated reporting of corporate enterprises. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(50), 87-101.
- Bezverkhyi, K., Parasii-Verhunenko, I., Yurchenko, O., Kazak, O., Zhytar, M., & Poddubna, N. (2024). Conceptual basis of anti-corruption audit. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(59), 77-89.
- Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2013). Regression analysis of count data (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Casady, C. B., Cepparulo, A., & Giuriato, L. (2024). Public-private partnerships for low-carbon, climate-resilient infrastructure: Insights from the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 470, 143338.
- Dube, A., Girardi, D., Jordà, Ò., & Taylor, A. M. (2023). A local projections approach to difference-in-differences event studies (NBER Working Paper No. 31184). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Engel, E., Fischer, R. D., & Galetovic, A. (2014). The economics of public-private partnerships: A basic guide. Cambridge University Press.
- Erina, L., Saptawan, A., & Martina, M. (2026). Rebuilding Trust, Restoring Compliance: An Experimental Study of Tax Morale among Young Taxpayers. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 10(1), 1-17.
- Fakhrunnas, F., Anto, M. B. H., Hasanah, L. L. N. E., & Fithria, A. (2025). The nexus of institutional quality and default risk in a dual banking system: Cross-country evidence. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(3), 191-202.
- Fernández-Olmos, M., Fleta-Asín, J., Gómez-Aguas, T., Muñoz, F., & Sáenz-Royo, C. (2025). Improved database of public-private partnerships from World Bank with imputed economic, institutional and conflict data. Data in Brief, 60, 111457.
- Fleta-Asín, J., & Muñoz, F. (2021). Renewable energy public-private partnerships in developing countries: Determinants of private investment. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 653-670.
- Gardner, J. (2022). Two-stage differences in differences (arXiv:2207.05943). arXiv.
- Gazanfarli, M., & Zhelev, Z. (2025). Dynamic modeling the impact of tax reforms on tax revenue: Evidence from Azerbaijan. Journal of International Studies, 18(1), 99-115.
- Goodman-Bacon, A. (2021). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 254-277.
- Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2021, April 21). Podderzhka MSB, sokhraneniye zanyatosti i realizatsiya proyektov – kak razvivayetsya GChP v Kazakhstane [Support for SMEs, preservation of employment and project implementation: How PPP is developing in Kazakhstan]. Official Information Resource of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (In Russian).
- Hamidova, L., Alikhanova, L., Kasumova, L., Karimova, T., & Mirzayeva, F. (2024). The impact of CO2 emissions from different types of transport on countries' logistics efficiency: Case of ITF member countries. Environmental Economics, 15(2), 215-231.
- Hammami, M., Ruhashyankiko, J.-F., & Yehoue, E. B. (2006). Determinants of public-private partnerships in infrastructure (IMF Working Paper No. 06/99). International Monetary Fund.
- Hrytsenko, L., Sheliemina, N., & Latysh, D. (2026). Digital Government and Health System Performance: Does Digitalization Improve the Effectiveness of Health Expenditure? Health Economics and Management Review, 7(1), 21-40.
- International Budget Partnership. (2025). Open Budget Survey 2025 [Data set]. International Budget Partnership.
- International Monetary Fund, & World Bank. (2019). Public-private partnerships fiscal risk assessment model (PFRAM), version 2.0. International Monetary Fund.
- INTOSAI. (2007). ISSAI 5220: Guidelines on best practice for the audit of public/private finance and concessions. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions.
- Irwin, T. C., Mazraani, S., & Saxena, S. (2018). How to control the fiscal costs of public-private partnerships (IMF How to Note No. 18/04). International Monetary Fund.
- Junquera-Varela, R. F., Lucas-Mas, C. Ó., Krsul, I., Calderón, V., & Arce, P. (2022). Digital transformation of tax and customs administrations (Equitable Growth, Finance & Institutions Insight). World Bank.
- Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2025). Worldwide governance indicators, 2025 revision [Data set]. World Bank.
- Kazakhstan Center for Public-Private Partnership. (2026). Database of PPP projects in the Republic of Kazakhstan [Data set].
- Khandelwal, V., Chotia, V., Sharma, P., Soni, S., & Kalyani, S. (2024). Examining the nexus of infrastructure development and economic growth: Evidence from SAARC countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(4), 649-657.
- Kurmanov, N., Spankulova, L., Sabyrzhan, A., Kudebayeva, A., & Kirichok, O. (2026). Factors Influencing Income Inequality in the Regions of Kazakhstan. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 22(2), 55-67.
- Kuzior, A., Hrytsenko, L., Trojanek, M., & Oláh, J. (2026). GovTech as a "technological - institutional - human" system: Non-linear effects on social progress and human well-being. Human Technology, 22(1), 198-218.
- Kuzior, A., Liashenko, V., Petrova, I., & Serdiuk, O. (2023a). Integrated models of the combination of EU grant funding and private funding in the energy sector of Ukraine based on Public-Private Partnership. Polityka Energetyczna - Energy Policy Journal, 26(4), 165-194.
- Kuzior, A., Zakharkina, L., Kubaščikova, Z., Chentsov, V., & Lyeonov, S. (2023b). Insurance market transparency research trends: Bibliometric analysis. Insurance Markets and Companies, 14(1), 136-152.
- Kyzenko, O., Sitnicki, M. W., Zahorodnia, K., Hrebeshkova, O., & Verba, V. (2026). Ethical Leadership and Institutional Convergence in European Management Consulting: A Cluster-Based Comparative Analysis. Business Ethics and Leadership, 10(1), 345-366.
- Lee, S. (2025). Digitalization and Domestic Revenue Mobilization: Governmental Responsiveness and Capabilities Matter. Governance, 38(4).
- Lyeonov, S., Moroz, A., Dudziuk, I., & Chuluunbaatar, E. (2025). Green rules & grey markets: Do environmental policies influence the informal economy? Economics and Sociology, 18(1), 313-338.
- Mačiulytė-Šniukienė, A., Dargenytė-Kacilevičienė, L., & Matuzevičiūtė, K. (2023). Convergence in transport and ICT infrastructure: Evidence of EU member states. Journal of International Studies, 16(4), 77-96.
- Manaf, B., Djakons, D., & Bilokon, D. (2025). The Impact of Chinese Foreign Direct Investment on US Industry. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(2), 1-34.
- Megbowon, E. T., & Zerihun, M. F. (2025). Government Health Expenditure Gap Analysis: A Study on the Commitment to International Agreement and the Role of Economic and Institutional Factors. Health Economics and Management Review, 6(1), 95-109.
- Megits, N., Aliyev, S. T., Pustovhar, S., Bielialov, T., & Prokopenko, O. (2022). The «Five-Helix» Model as an effective way to develop business in Industry 4.0 of selected countries. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 9(2), 357-368.
- Messono, O. O. (2025). The intersection of publics services digitalization and women’s empowerment in tax revenue mobilization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 219(C).
- Michałek, J. (2023). Incentives and concessions for investors as part of planning investment activities in Special Economic Zones. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 27(2), 223-239.
- Mohapatra, B. P. (2026). Own Revenue Growth of Rural Local Governments and Socio-Economic Challenges. SocioEconomic Challenges, 10(1), 105-119.
- Ntuli, F., Ntshangase, B. A., & Msosa, S. K. (2026). Innovative Financial Management Reforms: A Catalyst of Good Governance in the South African Public Sector. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(4), 16-29.
- Oe, H., Yamaoka, Y., & Weeks, M. (2025). Public-Private Partnerships in Traditional Industries: A Comparative Governance Framework for Regional Revitalization in Japan and Central Europe. Public Governance, Regulation and Law, 1(1), 1-15.
- OECD. (2019). Public private partnerships review of Kazakhstan. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 19(2).
- Pakhnenko, O., Yarovenko, H., Semenog, A., Mordan, Y., & Tarasenko, O. (2025). Uncovering patterns of digital transformation of European economies using self-organizing maps. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(3), 581-596.
- Patnaik, B., & Hedau, A. (2026). Sustainable Infrastructure Investment: Financial Drivers, Policy Dynamics and Socio-Economic Challenges. SocioEconomic Challenges, 10(1), 27-41.
- Percoco, M. (2014). Quality of institutions and private participation in transport infrastructure investment: Evidence from developing countries. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 70(C), 50-58.
- Portugal-Perez, A., & Wilson, J. S. (2012). Export performance and trade facilitation reform: Hard and soft infrastructure. World Development, 40(7), 1295-1307.
- President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2019, July 15). Vystupleniye Glavy gosudarstva Kasym-Zhomarta Tokayeva na rasshirennom zasedanii Pravitel'stva [Speech by the Head of State Kassym-Jomart Tokayev at the expanded meeting of the Government]. Akorda. (In Russian).
- Privara, A. (2025). Wired for stability: The role of infrastructure and Fintech in migrant employment. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(1), 285-325.
- Republic of Kazakhstan. (1998). On Audit Activity. The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 20 November 1998 No. 304.
- Republic of Kazakhstan. (2015a). On public-private partnership. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan Law No. 379-V LRK.
- Republic of Kazakhstan. (2015b). About the state audit and financial control. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of November 12, 2015 No. 392-V ZRK.
- Republic of Kazakhstan. (2021). Law of The Republic Of Kazakhstan of January 2, 2021 No. 399-VI ZRK “About modification and amendments in some legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan concerning recovery of economic growth.”
- Republic of Kazakhstan. (2022). Presidential Decree of the Republic Of Kazakhstan of November 26, 2022 No. 5 “About some questions of the Highest auditor chamber of the Republic of Kazakhstan.”
- Republic of Kazakhstan. (2024). Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan of December 4, 2024 No. 141-VIII ZRK “About the republican budget for 2025–2027.”
- Revision Commission of Almaty Region. (2023, December 15). Ob itogakh gosudarstvennogo audita effektivnosti realizatsii proyektov gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva [On the results of the state audit of the effectiveness of public-private partnership projects]. (In Russian).
- Saher, L., Vakulenko, I., & Oleksich, Z. (2025). What Makes Growth Inclusive? Cluster-Based Insights for EU Member States. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(3), 275-289.
- Samoilov, A., Osei-Kyei, R., Kussaiyn, M., Mamyrbayev, A., & Mukashev, Y. (2024). Cross-Country Comparison of Risk Factors in Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development: Evidence from Colombia, Kazakhstan, and Ghana. Sustainability, 16(13), 5712.
- Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658.
- Satpayeva, Z., Bekmurat, Z., Medeni, T., Kangalakova, D., & Xue, L. (2025). Digital transformation readiness of Kazakhstani enterprises: Mapping regional and sectoral capacities. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(3), 161-175.
- Shapovalova, A., Prokopova, O., Kuzmenko, O., Saienko, V., & Lazebnyk, L. (2023). Taxation and economic growth in transition economies. Review of Economics and Finance, 21(1), 776-782.
- Sharma, C. (2012). Determinants of PPP in infrastructure in developing economies. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(2), 149-166.
- Shygun, M., Bezverkhyi, K., Pylypenko, O., Yurchenko, O., & Poddubna, N. (2023). Presenting financial information in digital formats as a base for analysis and audit of business activities of enterprises. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(53), 233-246.
- Supreme Audit Chamber of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2023). Rules for conducting special-purpose audit of quasi-public-sector entities and presenting the audit opinion (Normative Decree of the Accounts Committee No. 21-НҚ of 30 November 2015, as amended by Normative Decree No. 7-НҚ of 20 February 2023). Adilet Legal Information System. (In Russian).
- Supreme Audit Chamber of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2024). Zaklyucheniye k otchetu Pravitel'stva Respubliki Kazakhstan ob ispolnenii respublikanskogo byudzheta za 2023 god [Conclusion on the report of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the execution of the republican budget for 2023] (approved by Resolution of the Mazhilis of the Parliament No. 17-VIII-ПРК of 21 June 2024). (In Russian).
- Tutar, H., Akçi, Y., Fialova, V., & György, K. (2025). The asymmetric impact of digital infrastructure on income inequality: A panel quantile regression analysis of OECD countries. Economics and Sociology, 18(4), 208-223.
- Ugulava, G. (2026). Two Faces of Decline in Public Governance: Accountability Erosion and Rent-Seeking. Public Governance, Regulation and Law, 2(1), 20-32.
- UNCTAD. (2023). World investment report 2023: Investing in sustainable energy for all. United Nations.
- UNCTAD. (2025). World investment report 2025: International investment in the digital economy. United Nations.
- United Nations. (2024). United Nations e-government survey 2024: Accelerating digital transformation for sustainable development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
- United Nations. (2025). UN global survey on digital and sustainable trade facilitation 2025 [Data set]. United Nations Regional Commissions.
- Vakhovych, I. M., Oleksandrenko, I. V., & Zabedyuk, M. S. (2014). Methods of assessing the enterprise investment attractiveness. Actual Problems of Economics, 11, 154-160.
- Vakhovych, I., Satyvaldieva, B., Dooranov, A., & Slynko, A. (2021). Smart specialization of the region as a tool for modernizing innovative development. Estudios de Economía Aplicada, 39(5).
- Valaskova, K., Juracka, D., Nagy, M., & Chaudhuri, S. (2025). Digital readiness across the European Union: A multidimensional empirical assessment of structural determinants, intra-regional disparities, and strategic implications in the era of Industry 5.0. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(3), 1035-1086.
- Vasylieva, T., Kasperowicz, R., Tiutiunyk, I., & Lukács, E. (2023). Transparency and trust in the public sector: Target and benchmarks to ensure macroeconomic stability. Journal of International Studies, 16(4), 117-135.
- Vasylieva, T., Krawczyk, D., Rącka, I., & Fenyves, V. (2026). Digital government and quality of life: Unpacking the human-centred mechanisms of e-government development. Human Technology, 22(1), 178-197.
- World Bank Group. (2020). Benchmarking infrastructure development 2020: Assessing regulatory quality to prepare, procure, and manage PPPs and traditional public investment in infrastructure projects.
- World Bank. (2020). Benchmarking infrastructure development 2020: PPP master data [Data set].
- World Bank. (2022). GovTech maturity index, 2022 update: Trends in public sector digital transformation (Equitable Growth, Finance and Institutions Insight). Washington, DC: World Bank.
- World Bank. (2023). Benchmarking infrastructure development 2023: PPP dataset [Data set].
- World Bank. (2025a). Private participation in infrastructure (PPI): 2024 annual report.
- World Bank. (2025b). Benchmarking infrastructure development 2025: PPP master data [Data set].
- World Bank. (2026). World development indicators [Data set].
- World Trade Organization. (2026). Trade Facilitation Agreement Database: Implementation commitments by measure and member [Data set].
- Yarovenko, H., Bilovodska, V., Bylbas, R., Pankiv, O., Baghirzade, M., Niemi, O., & Djakons, D. (2025). Digital Readiness of European Countries to Combat Corruption and Cyber Threats: Panel Analysis. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(2), 238-265.
- Yefimenko, A., Boronos, V., Serpeninova, Y., & Koldovskyi, A. (2025). Innovative and Technological Determinants of Corruption Reduction: How do Knowledge and Technology Contribute to Public Integrity and Transparency? Knowledge Economy and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), 21-34.
- Yi, X., Farooq, U., Alomair, A., Al Naim, A. S., & Khudoykulov, K. (2025). Leveraging Financial Inclusion to Drive Public-Private Partnership Investments in Energy: Role of Financial Institutions in ASEAN Nations. Engineering Economics, 36(5), 602-616.
- Zhidebekkyzy, A., Moldabekova, A., & Bilan, Y. (2025). Responsible production in Kazakhstan's manufacturing sector: An empirical assessment of environmental, operational, and social drivers. Environmental Economics, 16(2), 119-133.


