Predicting smart wrist wearable adoption intention among South African youth
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.22(3).2026.02
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2026, Issue #3, pp. 21-36
- 10 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Smart wrist wearables (SWWs) represent the leading segment in the multi-billion-dollar global fitness tracker industry. Despite the robust and thriving global market, South Africa remains far behind in adoption, penetration rate and market value. As such, this study aims to predict SWW adoption intention among South African youth by examining the influence of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, information availability, social image, brand name, perceived performance risk, perceived cost, and attitude. The study surveyed 312 South African Parkrun attendees aged 18-34 using a self-administered questionnaire. The youth market was specifically targeted as they represent the primary users of wearable technology and because of their high digital engagement. SPSS and AMOS v. 27 were used for model validation and hypothesis testing through confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis, respectively. The results show that device ease of use boosts perceived usefulness (β = 0.82, p < 0.01), consequently influencing attitudes (β = 0.78, p < 0.01) and adoption intentions. Information availability (β = 0.20, p < 0.01) significantly influences adoption intentions, where perceived performance risk (β = 0.22, p < 0.01) echoes this finding for attitude. Social image (β = –0.11, p < 0.05) and perceived cost (β = –0.47, p < 0.01) had a significant, adverse effect on respondents’ attitude towards SWWs. Notably, brand name (β = –0.01, p > 0.01) plays no notable role in attitude formation and ultimate adoption intentions. These findings offer actionable insights for SWW brands seeking to develop targeted, competitive strategies.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, D12, O33
-
References62
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Prediction model for smart wrist wearable adoption among South African youth
-
- Table 1. Sample’s demographic data
- Table 2. PCA results
- Table 3. Measurement model reliability and validity
- Table 4. Measurement model estimates and model fit
- Table 5. Summary statistics and one-sample t-test
- Table 6. Relationships between latent factors and collinearity diagnostics
- Table 7. Structural model paths per hypothesis
- Table 8. Structural model fit
-
- Aamoth, D. (2025). Here are budget-friendly fitness trackers: 4 options that won’t break the bank. Fast Company.
- Adapa, A., Hall, R. H., Smith, S. N., Nah, F. H., & Siau, K. (2018). Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(5), 399-409.
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
- Almén, N., Lundberg, H., Sundin, O., & Jasson, B. (2018). The reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire. Nordic Psychology, 70(4), 342-333.
- Appiah-Nimo, K., Muthambi, A. & Devey, R. (2024). Consumer-based brand equity of South African luxury fashion brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 28(4), 775-791.
- Azionya, C. M., & Overton-de Klerk, N. (2021). The development of a brand perception instrument for South African youth. Journal for Community Communications and Information Impact, 26, 33-52.
- Barai, T. V., & Mutreja, S. (2023). Smartwatch Market Research, 2032. Allied Market Research.
- Benissan, E. (2024). Understanding luxury in South Africa. VOGUE Business.
- Cheung, M. L., Leung, W. K., & Chan, H. (2020). Driving healthcare wearable technology adoption for Generation Z consumers in Hong Kong. Young Consumers, 22(1), 10-27.
- Choi, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 777-786.
- Chuah, S. H.-W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: the role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276-284.
- Cohen. J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
- Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(10), 7.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
- Dinesh, G. P., & Divyabharathi. (2023). Youth as Target Market Based on Their Media and Buying Habits: A Case Study of Millennial’s in India. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 2(1), 277-282.
- Dutta, A., Kovid, R., Drave, V. A., & Bhatia, M. S. (2024). Internet of Things adoption: unpacking the role of perceived brand credibility. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 74(7-8), 2698-2715.
- Felea, M., Bucur, M., Negruţiu, C., Nitu, M., & Stoica, D. A. (2021). Wearable technology adoption among Romanian Students: A structural model based on TAM. Amphitheatre Economic, 23(57), 376-391.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430-447.
- Gao, S., Zhang, X., & Peng, S. (2016). Understanding the adoption of smart wearable devices to assist healthcare in China. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services & e-Society (pp. 280-291). New York: Springer.
- Gaskin, J., & Lim, J. (2016). CFA model fit (AMOS Plugin). Gaskination’s StatWiki.
- Govender, B. (2024). Bridging the digital divide in South Africa: Pathways to inclusive education technology. REGENT Business School.
- Gowin, M., Wilkerson, A., Maness, S., Larson, D. J., Crowson, M., Smith, M., & Cheney, M. K. (2019). Wearable activity tracker use in young adults through the lens of social cognitive theory. American Journal of Health Education, 50(1), 40-51.
- Gulati A. K., Lobo, R. E., Nihala, N., Bhat, V., Bora, N., Vaishali, K., & Sinha, M. K. (2024). Young adults journey with digital fitness tools: a qualitative study on use of fitness tracking device. F1000Research, 13, 1-14.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Hampshire, UK: Cengage Learning.
- Hattingh, A. & Muller, C. (2022). Profiling wrist-based fitness tracker usage among South African Generation Y consumers. In Proceedings of Social Sciences International Research Conference (SSIRC) (pp. 19-21).
- Hwang, C. G. (2016). Consumers’ acceptance of wearable technology: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. International Textile and Apparel Association, 72(1), 1-2.
- Jacobs, S. (2024). When you will earn the most money in South Africa. Daily Investor.
- Jeong, S. C., Kim, S. H., Park, J. Y., & Choi, B. (2017). Domain-specific innovativeness and new product adoption: A case of wearable devices. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 399-412.
- Kemp, S. (2023). Digital 2023 Deep-Dive: The rise of wearables. Datareportal.
- Kim, K. J., & Shin, D. H. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches. Internet Research, 25(4), 527-541.
- Kim, T., & Chiu, W. (2019). Consumer acceptance of sports wearable technology: the role of technology readiness. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 20(1), 109-126.
- Kuo, Y. F., & Yen, S. N. (2009). Towards understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 103-110.
- Lunney, A., Cunningham, N. R., & Eastin, M. S. (2016). Wearable fitness technology: A structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 114-120.
- Malhotra, N. K. (2020). Marketing research. An applied orientation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
- Mangadi, T., & Petersen, F. (2024). Factors influencing the acceptance and use of a South African data-free job search application. South African Journal of Information Management, 26(1), 1-11.
- Morton, L. P. (2002). Targeting Generation Y. Public Relations Quarterly, 47(2), 46-48.
- Muller, C. (2019). Generation Y students’ attitude towards and intention to use activity-tracking devices (Doctoral Thesis). North-West University, Vanderbijlpark.
- Muller, C. (2022). South African millennial consumers’ adoption of wearable activity trackers: Extending the technology acceptance model. African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences (AJPHES), 28(4), 275-298.
- Muller, C., De Klerk, N. Bevan-Dye, A-L. 2018. Relationship between social image, brand name, subjective norms and South African Generation Y students’ attitude towards wearable activity-tracking devices. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 10(2), 83-98.
- Nasir, S., & Yurder, Y. (2015). Consumers’ and physicians’ perceptions about high tech wearable health products. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1261-1267.
- National Department of Health. (2020). National Digital Health Strategy for South Africa 2019–2024.
- Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Pangarkar, T. (2025). Fitness Tracker Statistics 2025 By Health, Activities.
- Park, E., Kim, K.J., & Kwon, S.J. (2016). Understanding the emergence of wearable devices as next-generation tools for health communication. Information Technology & People, 29(7), 17-732.
- Park, Y., & Chen, J. V. (2007). Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(9), 1349-1365.
- Phonthanukitithaworn, C., Sellitto, C., & Fong, M. W. L. (2015). A study of mobile payment (M-Payment) services adoption in Thailand. In M. Khosrow-Pour, D. B. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (3rd ed.) (pp. 731-741).
- Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123-148.
- Rawal, J. (2025). Fitness Tracker Market: Key market insights. Fortune Business Insights.
- Research & Markets. (2025). Smart Wearable Global Market Report 2025: Smartwatches, Earwear and Health Rings are Major Growth Segments - Global Smart Wearable Market to Surpass $300 Billion by 2029.
- Roh, S., Byon, K. K., & Pedersen, P. M. (2023). Fitness App Usage Intention: Investigating Consumer Innovativeness and the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Modern Sport Management, 2(2), 1-21.
- Shin, D. (2007). User acceptance of mobile internet: Implication for convergence technologies. Interacting with Computers, 19(4), 472-483.
- Shin, D. (2009). Determinants of customer acceptance of multi-service network: An implication for IP-based technologies. Information & Management, 46(1), 16-22.
- Shin, D. (2012). What makes consumers use VoIP over mobile phones? Freeriding or consumerization of new service. Telecommunications Policy, 36(4), 311-323.
- Statista. (2025). Fitness Trackers - South Africa.
- Stats SA. (2025). South Africa’s Youth in the Labour Market: A Decade in Review.
- Szwajlik, A. (2019). Consumer Behavior of “Young Adults” as a Determinant of the Development of Product Innovation. Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, 4(1), 63-71.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
- Verified Market Research. (2025). Fitness Tracker Market Size and Forecast.
- Wang, Z., Fang, D., Liu, X., Zhang, L., Duan, H., Wang, C., & Guo, K. (2023). Consumer Acceptance of Sports Wearables: The Role of Products Attributes. SAGE Open, 13(3).
- Wu, J. H., & Wang, S.C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 42(5), 719-729.
- Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256-269.


