Mapping attitude, engagement and purchase behavioral intention through multistage PLS-SEM: Exploration of gamified marketing dynamics
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.22(3).2026.05
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2026, Issue #3, pp. 70–86
- 7 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Gamified marketing has become an increasingly critical strategy in digital commerce, yet the full pathway from consumer attitude through engagement to purchase behavioral intention remains insufficiently examined, particularly across demographic cohorts in emerging markets. This study investigates how gamification elements shape consumer attitudes, engagement and purchase behavioral intention among digital consumers in the Delhi National Capital Region of India. This quantitative study employs a structured survey administered between July and November 2025, yielding a final usable sample of 643 (56.8% male, 43.2% female). The study integrates the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) within a Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) framework. The results demonstrate that perceived agility (β = 0.307, p < 0.001), perceived ease of use (β = 0.278, p < 0.001), perceived usefulness (β = 0.259, p < 0.001), perceived enjoyment (β = 0.248, p < 0.001) and social influence (β = 0.188, p < 0.001) are significant drivers of consumer attitude. Consumer attitude strongly predicts consumer engagement (β = 0.550, p < 0.001) and purchase behavioral intention (β = 0.334, p < 0.001), with engagement partially mediating the attitude–purchase behavioral intention relationship (β = 0.196, p < 0.001). Measurement invariance testing followed by multi-group analysis reveals significant generational and gender-based differences in gamification drivers, underscoring the need for demographically tailored strategies. These findings advance theory by confirming the TAM-UTAUT integrated model in a gamified emerging-market context, and offer practitioners a roadmap for designing differentiated gamification campaigns that enhance engagement and drive purchase intention.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, O33, D12
-
References48
-
Tables11
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical framework
-
- Table 1. Demographic characteristics
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics with factor loadings
- Table 3. Construct reliability and validity
- Table 4. Discriminant validity assessment (Fornell–Larcker criterion and HTMT ratio)
- Table 5. Model-fit summary
- Table 6. Hypotheses testing results
- Table 7. Summary of MICOM results: gender
- Table 8. Gender-based multi-group analysis (MGA) results
- Table 9. Summary of MICOM results: generational cohorts
- Table 10. Generation-based Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) results
- Table A1. Summary of constructs and measurement items
-
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918.
- Al-Zyoud, M. F. (2021). The impact of gamification on consumer loyalty, electronic word-of mouth sharing and purchase behavior. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(3), e2263.
- Aparicio, M., Costa, C. J., & Moises, R. (2021). Gamification and reputation: key determinants of e-commerce usage and repurchase intention. Heliyon, 7(3).
- Balachandra, P. (2011). Dynamics of rural energy access in India: An assessment. Energy, 36(9), 5556-5567.
- Bravo, R., Catalán, S., & Pina, J. M. (2023). The impact of gamified loyalty programmes on customer engagement behaviours. A hotel industry application. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 14(5), 925-940.
- Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and Practice (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
- De Canio, F., Fuentes-Blasco, M., & Martinelli, E. (2021). Engaging shoppers through mobile apps: the role of gamification. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(7), 919-940.
- Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9-15).
- Elshoubashy, H., Abd Elkader, H., & Khalifa, N. (2023). Empirical study on gamification effect on brand engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior Research, 8(1), 297-318.
- Ezeudoka, B. C., & Fan, M. (2024). Determinants of behavioral intentions to use an E-Pharmacy service: Insights from TAM theory and the moderating influence of technological literacy. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 20(7), 605-617.
- Ghosh, M. (2019). Analyzing the engagement and attitude of elderly towards digital platforms in India. Journal of Creative Communications, 14(3), 214-234.
- Gunter, B., Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Williams, P. (2002). Online versus offline research: Implications for evaluating digital media. Aslib Proceedings, 54(4), 229-239.
- Gupta, S., Nagina, R., Paruthi, M., & Gupta, G. (2024). Marketing and Gamification: Application, Challenges, and Ethics. Routledge Studies in marketing, Routledge, Taylor & Francis, London, UK.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Classroom Companion: Business.
- Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?--A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025-3034).
- Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20.
- Hsu, C. L., Chen, Y. C., Yang, T. N., & Lin, W. K. (2017). Do website features matter in an online gamification context? Focusing on the mediating roles of user experience and attitude. Telematics and Informatics, 34(4), 196-205.
- Huang, P. Y., Niu, B., & Pan, S. L. (2021). Platform-based customer agility: An integrated framework of information management structure, capability, and culture. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102346.
- Jami Pour, M., Kazemi, Z., & Moeini, H. (2023). Understanding customer attitude toward advergames: An extended TAM approach. Arts and the Market, 13(2), 94-116.
- Jasrotia, S. S., Kamila, M. K., Chib, S., & Mishra, H. G. (2022). Role of engagement in online gaming: a study of generation Z customers. Digital Creativity, 33(1), 64-76.
- Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (pp. 245-257).
- Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 179-188.
- Leclercq, T., Hammedi, W., & Poncin, I. (2018). The boundaries of gamification for engaging customers: Effects of losing a contest in online co-creation communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 44(1), 82-101.
- Li, M., Wang, Y., Wu, Y., & Liu, H. (2021). Gamification narrative design as a predictor for mobile fitness app user persistent usage intentions: a goal priming perspective. Enterprise Information Systems, 15(10), 1501-1545.
- Li, R., Chung, T. L. D., & Fiore, A. M. (2017). Factors affecting current users’ attitude towards e-auctions in China: An extended TAM study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 19-29.
- Lopes, J. M., Silva, L. F., Massano-Cardoso, I., & Galhardo, A. (2024). Running towards a Better Brand Attitude: How Gamification in Nike Run Club Can Help? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-29.
- Mishra, S., & Malhotra, G. (2021). The gamification of in-game advertising: Examining the role of psychological ownership and advertisement intrusiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 61, 102245.
- Naikoo, M. W., Talukdar, S., Rihan, M., Ishtiaq, M., Roy, S. S., & Rahman, A. (2025). Mapping Real Estate-induced Urban Expansion in Delhi NCR: A Synergy of Artificial Intelligence and Geospatial Models. Earth Systems and Environment, 1-17.
- Nalluri, V., Reddy, M. S., & Kumar, V. (2020). Consumers’ intention for Green Purchase: An Empirical Analysis on Foreign Products. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 961-965.
- Oberoi, Z. (2024). Using gamification to enhance development: How game elements can contribute to sustainable development in the Global South. Busara Center for Behavioral Economics.
- Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Joaquim, S., Toda, A. M., Palomino, P. T., Vassileva, J., & Isotani, S. (2022). The effects of personalized gamification on students’ flow experience, motivation, and enjoyment. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 16.
- Polo-Peña, A. I., Frías-Jamilena, D. M., & Fernández-Ruano, M. L. (2020). Influence of gamification on perceived self-efficacy: gender and age moderator effect. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 22(3), 453-476.
- Raman, P. (2021). Examining the importance of gamification, social interaction and perceived enjoyment among young female online buyers in India. Young Consumers, 22(3), 387-412.
- Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How Gamification motivates: an Experimental Study of the Effects of Specific Game Design Elements on Psychological Need Satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380.
- Santos, P. M., Dias, J. M., & Bairrada, C. M. (2024). Gamification in marketing: Insights on current and future research directions based on a bibliometric and theories, contexts, characteristics and methodologies analysis. Heliyon, 10(11).
- Sharma, W., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., Verma, A., & Kumra, R. (2024). Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 198, 122988.
- Silverman, R. M., & Patterson, K. (2021). Qualitative research methods for community development. Routledge.
- Thakur, A., Bansal, I., & Mohamed, I. A. (2024). Gamifying the shopping experience: a systematic literature review on gamification in e-commerce apps. In Future of Management: Embracing Sustainability, Diversity, and Inclusivity (1st ed.) (pp. 38-52).
- Tobon, S., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & García-Madariaga, J. (2020). Gamification and online consumer decisions: Is the game over? Decision Support Systems, 128, 113167.
- Tondello, G. F., Wehbe, R. R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A., & Nacke, L. (2019). The gamification user types hexad scale. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
- Venkatesh, Thong, & Xu. (2022). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
- Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 122-146.
- Yadav, R., & Saini, C. P. (2024). Gamification and online shopping experience. In Marketing and Gamification (pp. 81-99).
- Yang, Y., Asaad, Y., & Dwivedi, Y. (2017). Examining the impact of gamification on intention of engagement and brand attitude in the marketing context. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 459-469.
- Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media.


