Attractiveness of value-based versus technology-based software-defined vehicle concepts to consumers and employees
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.22(3).2026.24
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2026, Issue #3, pp. 387–400
- 6 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Software-defined vehicles (SDVs) are gaining importance as a key innovation in the automotive industry, yet their value from the perspectives of consumers and employees remains insufficiently understood. This study aims to examine whether value-based SDV concepts increase perceived attractiveness compared with technology-based concepts. Randomized survey experiment was conducted through an online survey in Japan from July 23 to July 25, 2025, with 600 respondents aged 20-69, including car owners who drove at least once a month and full-time employees in the automobile, home appliance, and IT industries, selected as relevant evaluators of SDV value in market and workplace contexts. The value-based concept achieved a higher mean attractiveness score than the technology-based concept (3.375 vs. 3.132, t(598) = 3.11, p = 0.002) and a higher Top-2-Box attractiveness rate (47.7% vs. 36.5%, χ²(1) = 7.73, p = 0.005). Simple slope analyses yielded patterns that were directionally consistent with expectations, but the interaction effects of age and personal innovativeness were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that, in this Japanese online survey sample and under the specific stimuli used in this study, value-based SDV concept emphasizing rapid feedback incorporation and idea realization was rated as more attractive than a technology-based concept.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, O33, L62
-
References39
-
Tables4
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Mean attractiveness ratings of SDV concepts for all respondents
- Figure 2. Mean attractiveness ratings of SDV concepts by respondent type
- Figure B1. Technology-based concept stimulus (presented to both consumer and employee groups)
- Figure B2. Value-based concept stimulus for consumers
- Figure B3. Value-based concept stimulus for employees
-
- Table 1. Respondent characteristics by experimental group (%)
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics of attractiveness by experimental group
- Table 3. Regression results for perceived attractiveness (OLS)
- Table A1. Survey items and sources
-
- Aaker, D. A., & Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). Brand leadership. New York, NY: The Free Press.
- Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501-517.
- Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119.
- Benleulmi, A. Z., & Ramdani, B. (2022). Behavioural intention to use fully autonomous vehicles: Instrumental, symbolic, and affective motives. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 86, 226-237.
- Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175-184.
- Bhattacharjee, A., Mahmood, H., Lu, S., Ammar, N., Ganlath, A., & Shi, W. (2023). Edge-assisted over-the-air software updates. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (pp. 18-27).
- Bodei, C., De Vincenzi, M., & Matteucci, I. (2023). From hardware-functional to software-defined vehicles and their security issues. In Proceedings of the IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (pp. 1-10).
- Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3), 197-218.
- Çoklar, A. N., & Tatli, A. (2021). Examining the digital nativity levels of digital generations: From Generation X to Generation Z. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(4), 433-444.
- Conduit, J., & Mavondo, F. T. (2001). How critical is internal customer orientation to market orientation? Journal of Business Research, 51(1), 11-24.
- Cross Marketing. (2025). Cross marketing panel.
- Dutt, D., Natarajan, V., Wilson, A., & Robinson, R. (2020). Steering into Industry 4.0 in the automotive sector. Deloitte.
- Fundin, A. P., & Bergman, B. L. S. (2003). Exploring the customer feedback process. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(2), 55-65.
- Gardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. (1955). The product and the brand. Harvard Business Review, 33(2), 33-39.
- Hamann, D., Williams, R. L., Jr., & Omar, M. (2007). Branding strategy and consumer high-technology products. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16(2), 98-111.
- Ibrahim, B., & Aljarah, A. (2023). The era of Instagram expansion: Matching social media marketing activities and brand loyalty through customer relationship quality. Journal of Marketing Communications, 29(1), 1-25.
- Jeon, J. E. (2017). The impact of brand concept on brand equity. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 233-245.
- Kato, T. (2021). Brand loyalty explained by concept recall: Recognizing the significance of the brand concept compared to features. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 9(3), 185-198.
- Kato, T., Kurachi, T., Fujita, K., Yajima, M., Hayami, K., & Koizumi, M. (2024). Verification of the concept of utilising personal computer log management technology to improve employee motivation. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2102, 69-78.
- Khamis, A., & Goswami, P. (2025). Rethinking vehicle architecture through softwarization and servitization. IEEE Access, 13, 126213-126226.
- Liu, Z., Zhang, W., & Zhao, F. (2022). Impact, challenges and prospect of software-defined vehicles. Automotive Innovation, 5(2), 180-194.
- Madhuri, T. S., & Vishnu, J. B. (2025). Software-defined vehicles: The future of automobile industry. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Communication Systems an Networks (COMSNETS) (pp. 192-197).
- Nasr, L., Burton, J., Gruber, T., & Kitshoff, J. (2014). Exploring the impact of customer feedback on the well-being of service entities: A TSR perspective. Journal of Service Management, 25(4), 531-555.
- Oh, S. B., Do, Y. S., Lim, S. J., Choi, H. J., Cha, S. K., Hong, H. K., Lim, S. H., & Jeon, J. W. (2025). Design of a scaled-vehicle research platform for software-defined vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering (pp. 7-12).
- Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
- Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017). The customer value proposition: Evolution, development, and application. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(4), 467-489.
- Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
- Rafiq, M., & Ahmed, P. K. (2000). Advances in the internal marketing concept: Definition, synthesis and extension. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(6), 449-462.
- Rindova, V. P., & Petkova, A. P. (2007). When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value. Organization Science, 18(2), 217-234.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
- Sugimoto, T. (2021). Japanese companies switch to “software-driven” business models. Nikkei Asia.
- Szalavetz, A. (2024). In-house software development for software-defined vehicles: Major changes ahead in automotive value chains? International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 24(5), 22-39.
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
- Topaloglu, O., & Gokalp, O. N. (2018). How brand concept affects consumer response to product recalls: A longitudinal study in the US auto industry. Journal of Business Research, 88, 245-254.
- Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
- Vdovic, H., Babic, J., & Podobnik, V. (2019). Automotive software in connected and autonomous electric vehicles: A review. IEEE Access, 7, 166365-166379.
- Vitale, G., & Hollander, M. (2023). The software-defined vehicle: How to verify and validate software functions. In Proceedings of the International Stuttgart Symposium (pp. 399-405).
- Wirtz, J., Tambyah, S. K., & Mattila, A. S. (2010). Organizational learning from customer feedback received by service employees: A social capital perspective. Journal of Service Management, 21(3), 363-387.
- Zhang, B., Huang, J., Wang, J., Su, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhong, Z. (2024). Can software-defined vehicles never roll over: A perspective of active structural transformation. Fundamental Research, 4(5), 1063-1071.


