The wealth of nations and sustainable development: energy intensity and the environmental Kuznets curve
-
Author(s)Ola Honningdal GryttenLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-0980
,
Magnus LindmarkLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-2318
,
Kjell Bjørn MindeLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4641-380X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.11(1).2020.10
-
Article InfoVolume 11 2020, Issue #1, pp. 110-123
- Cited by
- 1706 Views
-
493 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Scholars warn that wealth leads to unsustainable environmental development. However, over the last decades, studies have shown an increase in environmental degradation at the initial stage of economic growth, and then a decline when economic growth reaches a certain level. This first acceleration and then deceleration create an inverted U-shaped curve between pollution and economic growth, called the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC). Environmental degradation can be measured by different factors. This paper deals with two of them, i.e. energy consumption and energy intensity (EI). The latter is measured as the ratio between energy consumption and GDP. The relationship of energy consumption and intensity to economic growth can serve as a tool for examining whether an EKC exists. The paper presents continuous series of energy consumption energy intensity and gross domestic product for the Norwegian mainland economy 1835–2019. The series are used to examine the possible existence of relative and absolute environmental Kuznets curves (EKC). Time series are established using available data and annual figures for 1835–2019, which are presented for the first time. They depict a development that, first, reflects an almost constant downward trend in EI, and, second, the existence of EKCs. The paper also proposes a polynomial regression model to discuss the relationship between environmental degradation as measured by energy consumption and intensity on the one hand, and economic growth on the other. It is concluded that there are both relative and absolute EKC-relations between environmental degradation and economic growth, with 1975 as relative and 2002 as absolute turning point.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O10, O44, N50, Q01, Q34
-
References47
-
Tables0
-
Figures12
-
- Figure 1. Relationship between wealth (economic growth) and environmental degradation in the EKC
- Figure 1a. Relative EKC
- Figure 1b. Absolute EKC
- Figure 2. Historical energy consumption and GDP for Norway
- Figure 2a. Energy consumption by source of production in Petajoule derived units, 1835–2012
- Figure 2b. GDP in 2015-NOK, 1835–2019 (semi-logarithmic scale)
- Figure 3. Energy intensity and consumption, 1835–2019
- Figure 3a. Energy intensity in Gigajoule derived units per GDP in 2015-NOK
- Figure 3b. Energy consumption per capita in billion Gigajoule derived units
- Figure 4. Energy intensity in Gigajoule derived units vs GDP per capita in 2015-NOK, 1835–2019
- Figure 5. Energy Intensity in Gigajoule derived units vs GDP per capita in 2015-NOK, 1950–2019
- Figure 6. Energy consumption per capita in Gigajoule derived units vs GDP per capita in NOK-2015, 1835–2019
-
- Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, … Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, end the environment. Science, 268, 520-521.
- Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Heal, G., ... Walker, B. (2004). Are we consuming too much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 147-172.
- Auty, R. (1985). Materials intensity of GDP: research issues on the measurement and explanation of change, Resource Policy, 11(4), 275-283.
- Beckermann, W. (1992). Economic Growth and the environment. Whose growth? Whose environment? World Development, 20(4), 481-496.
- Bhagawati, J. (1993). The case for free trade. Scientific American, (11), 42-49.
- Bimonte, S. (2009). Growth and environmental quality: Testing the double covergence hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 68(8-9), 2406-2411
- Bimonte, S., & Punzo, L. F. (2005). Environmental policy options in the multi-regimes framework. In L. Leskow, M. Puchet and L. F. Punzo (Eds.), New Tools of Economic Dynamics. Springer: New York.
- Bruvoll, A., & Fæhn, T. (2005). Økonomisk vekst – medisin mot dårlig miljø? Økonomisk forum, 59(2), 34-43. (In Norwegian).
- Chertow, M. R. (2000). The IPAT Equation and Its Variants. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(4), 13-29.
- Ciegis, R., Streimikiene, D., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2008). The use of the environmental Kuznets curve; environmental and economic implications. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 33(2/3), 313-335.
- Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, Growth, and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7-71.
- Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431-455.
- Gales, B., Kander, A., Malanima, P., & Rubio, M. (2007). North versus South: Energy transition and energy intensity in Europe over 200 years. European Review of Economic History, 11(2), 219-253.
- Grimstad, M. L. (2019). Hva er energiintensitet, og hvordan kan den måles? Oslo: Statistics Norway. Documents, 24, 1-19. (In Norwegian).
- Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NBER Working Paper, 3419).
- Grytten, O. H. (2020). Two Centuries of Economic Growth: Norwegian GDP 1816-2020 (NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper No. 10/2020).
- Harbaugh, W. T., Levinson, A., & Wilson, D. M. (2002). Reexamining the Empirical Evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3), 541-551.
- Hartwick, J. M. (1977). Intergenerational equity and the investment of rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review, 67(5), 972-974
- Johansson, P. O., & Kriström, B. (2007). On a clear day you might see an environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1), 77-90.
- Kander, A. (2002) Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in Sweden 1800-2000. Lund Studies in Economic History 19.
- Kander, A., Malanima, P., & Warde, P. (2013). Power to the People: Energy in Europe over the Last Five Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Koilo, V. (2019a). Evidence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Unleashing the Opportunity of Industry 4.0 in Emerging Economies. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3), 122.
- Koilo, V. (2019b). Sustainability issues in maritime transport and main challenges of the shipping industry. Environmental Economics, 10(1), 48-65.
- Kunnas, J., & Myllyntaus, T. (2009). Postponed leap in carbon dioxide emissions: The impact of energy efficiency, fuel choices, and industrial structure on the Finnish energy economy 1800–2005. Global Environment, 2(3), 154-189.
- Lindmark, M., & Minde, K. B. (2018). Energy consumption in the Norwegian mainland economy 1835–2012. Heimen, 55(2), 157-177.
- Maddison, A. (2007). Contours of the World Economy, 1-2030 AD. Essays in Macro-Economic History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Malenbaum, W. (1978). World Demand for Raw Materials in 1985 and 2000. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, J. (1972). The Limits to Growth. New York: University Books.
- Mills, J. H., & Waite, T. A. (2009). Economic prosperity, biodiversity conservation, and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2087-2095.
- Nakicenovic, N., Grubler, A., & McDonald, A. (Eds.) (1998). Global Energy Perspectives. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, UK.
- Nemat, S. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(2), 757-773.
- Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Geneve: ILO, Technology and Employment Program.
- Rothman, D. S. (1998). Environmental Kuznets Curves – real progress or passing the buck? A case for consumption-based approaches. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 177-194.
- Schurr, S., & Netschert, B. (1978). Energy in the American economy, 1850–1975, an economic study of its history and prospects. John Hopkins Press: Baltimore.
- Skoglund, T. (2009). Bruttonasjonalprodukt etter næring og sluttanvendelse i historisk nasjonalregnskap. Beregninger for 1946–1949. Oslo: Statistics Norway. (In Norwegian).
- Smil, V. (2000). The energy question, again. Current History, 99(641), 408-412.
- Smil, V. (2016). Examining energy transitions: A dozen insights based on performance. Energy Research & Social Science, 22(1), 194-197.
- Spangenberg, J. H. (2001). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Methodological Artefact? Population and Environment, 23(2), 175-191.
- Statistics Norway. (2020).
- Stern, D. I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419-1439.
- Stoltz, G. (1955). Economic Survey, 1900–1950. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
- Tilton, J. E. (1990). The OECD countries: demand trend setters. In J. E. Tilton (Ed.), World Metal Demand: Trend and Prospects. Resources for the Future (pp. 35-76). Washington DC.
- Uchiyama, K. (2016). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis and Carbon Dioxide Emissions. New York: Springer.
- UN. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427 – Development and International Co-operation: Environment.
- Warde, P. (2019). Firewood consumption and energy transition: a survey of sources, methods and explanations in Europe and North America. Historia Agraria, 77(1), 7-32.
- Wilkinson, R. G. (1973). Poverty and progress: an ecological model of economic development. London: Methuen.
- Williams, R. H., Larson, E. D., & Ross, M. H. (1987). Materials, Affluence, and Industrial Energy Use. Annual Review of Energy, 12(1), 99-144.
-
Impact on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia’s economic growth
Rabiul Islam ,
Ahmad Bashawir Abdul Ghani ,
Irwanshah Zainal Abidin ,
Jeya Malar Rayaiappan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.05
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 55-62 Views: 11901 Downloads: 5686 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPoverty and income inequality are extreme issues that still exist in Malaysia. Any rise in poverty and income inequality definitely affect economic growth. There are many great efforts taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and to reduce the gap of income inequality which occurs since 1970’s. The incidence of poverty and income inequality is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. This paper is mainly to study the level of poverty and income inequality in Malaysia together with government intervention to develop Malaysia’s economic growth. The research is focused among the working people at Ipoh, Perak. In this paper, questionnaire forms are being distributed to get information regarding the issue of poverty and income inequality. It also looks into the strategies taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and income inequality. Few recommendations are given in terms of education policy, financial aid and assistance from government and non-government organization (NGO) to upgrade the standard and quality of living among the poor and lower-income group of people.
-
Impact of inflation on economic growth: evidence from Nigeria
Anthony Olugbenga Adaramola ,
Oluwabunmi Dada
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 1-13 Views: 9113 Downloads: 5418 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn an attempt to examine the influence of inflation on the growth prospects of the Nigerian economy, the study employs the autoregressive distributed lag on the selected variables, i.e. real gross domestic product (GDP), inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate, degree of economy`s openness, money supply, and government consumption expenditures for the period 1980–2018. The study findings indicate that inflation and real exchange rate exert a significant negative impact on economic growth, while interest rate and money supply indicate a positive and significant impact on economic growth. Other variables in the model depict no influence on the economic growth of Nigeria. The causality result shows the unidirectional relationships between interest rate, exchange rate, government consumption expenditures and gross domestic product. However, inflation and the degree of openness show no causal relationship with gross domestic product. As a result, the study recommends that a more pragmatic effort is needed by the monetary authorities to target the inflation vigorously to prevent its adverse effect by ensuring a tolerable rate that would stimulate the economic growth of Nigeria.
-
Formalization of the impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources on economic growth of countries in Central and Eastern Europe
Serhiy Kozmenko ,
Maxim Korneyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.06
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 48-58 Views: 7870 Downloads: 1375 TO CITEThe article deals with the impact of financialization on economic growth in countries of Central and Eastern Europe. It determinesthe impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization on economic growth of these countries. It proves that the implementation of measures aimed at increasing the openness of the economy and maintaining solvent demand have a positive impact on economic growth of the surveyed countries in the long run. It also proves the importance of developing a set of measures of strategic nature regulating imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization.
