Financial system as a neural network of trust: A conceptual framework for financial stability
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(4).2026.05
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2026, Issue #4, pp. 63–78
- 12 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Under stress, information about counterparties can change willingness to interact faster than balance-sheet indicators register it, yet financial stability analysis still treats trust mainly as an aggregate variable. The study aims to develop a conceptual framework explaining how information signals update trust in specific relationships and thereby change the effective topology of the financial network. The framework synthesizes information asymmetry, financial intermediation, institutional, and financial network theories; the neural network of trust serves only as a functional analogy. Trust is defined as a directed, time-varying relational state variable, distinct from perceived default risk, with willingness to transact treated as its consequence. A generic mechanism updates trust from its previous level, information signals, and feedback from realized interactions. The framework separates trust, potential channel capacity, effective link strength, and realized flow, with effective link strength serving as the edge weight; its general form allows positive link strength at low trust where collateral, guarantees, or legal enforcement substitute for trust. A network matrix of effective link strengths connects bilateral dynamics to systemic outcomes through centrality, concentration, redundancy, and dependence on critical nodes. Four propositions follow: signals alter trust before funds move; trust updating reshapes link strength and network topology; systemic consequences depend on the network position of affected links; and, although each link responds monotonically to trust, trust concentrated in systemically important links may increase intermediation efficiency while reducing systemic resilience under particular network configurations. The framework shifts financial stability analysis from the level of trust to its distribution across relationships.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D83, D85, E44, G01, G21
-
References32
-
Tables1
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Schematic representation of the architecture of information and financial flows in a neural network of trust
- Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the hypothesized trade-off between intermediation efficiency and systemic resilience
-
- Table A1. Institutional trust signals: source, affected relationship, expected direction of trust updating, potential empirical indicators, and expected time lags
-
- Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015). Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review, 105(2), 564-608.
- Afonso, G., Kovner, A., & Schoar, A. (2011). Stressed, not frozen: The federal funds market in the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 66(4), 1109-1139.
- Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
- Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1-33.
- Anand, K., Gai, P., & Marsili, M. (2012). Rollover risk, network structure and systemic financial crises. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(8), 1088-1100.
- Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393-414.
- European Central Bank. (2024). Financial stability review: November 2024.
- Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
- Glasserman, P., & Young, H. P. (2016). Contagion in financial networks. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(3), 779-831.
- Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61-94.
- Grytsenko, R. (2026). Measuring and targeting trust as an institutional resource in the financial system. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(68), 357-372.
- Haldane, A. G., & May, R. M. (2011). Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature, 469(7330), 351-355.
- Heiets, V. M. (2010). Dovira yak element sotsialnoho kapitalu v ekonomichnomu rozvytku Ukrainy [Trust as an element of social capital in Ukraine’s economic development]. Ekonomichna Teoriia, 3, 7-19. (In Ukrainian).
- Holmström, B., & Tirole, J. (1997). Financial intermediation, loanable funds, and the real sector. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 663-691.
- Hrytsenko, A. A. (Ed.). (2020). Dovira u instytutsionalnii arkhitektonitsi ekonomichnoho prostoru-chasu [Trust in the institutional architectonics of economic space-time] (Vols. 1-2). Znannia Ukrainy.
- Hrytsenko, A. A., & Lypov, V. V. (2020). Information platforms as a network institutional transformation. Journal of Institutional Studies, 12(2), 132-148. (In Russian).
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). Global financial stability report, October 2024: Steadying the course: Uncertainty, artificial intelligence, and financial stability.
- Iyer, R., & Puri, M. (2012). Understanding bank runs: The importance of depositor-bank relationships and networks. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1414-1445.
- Knell, M., & Stix, H. (2015). Trust in banks during normal and crisis times—Evidence from survey data. Economica, 82(S1), 995-1020.
- Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffmann, A., & Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing.
- National Bank of Ukraine (NBU). (2025). Business outlook survey: Q3 2025.
- National Bank of Ukraine (NBU). (2026). Financial stability report: December 2025.
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
- Onyshchenko, S., Brychko, M., Litovtseva, V., & Yevsieieva, A. (2022). Trust in the financial sector: A new approach to conceptualizing and measuring. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(42), 206-217.
- Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
- Saltelli, A. (2007). Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Social Indicators Research, 81(1), 65-77.
- Sapienza, P., Toldra-Simats, A., & Zingales, L. (2013). Understanding trust. The Economic Journal, 123(573), 1313-1332.
- Savolchuk, K., & Grui, A. (2022). Endogenous monetary policy credibility in Ukraine (NBU Working Paper No. 2/2022). National Bank of Ukraine.
- Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423.
- Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
- Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393-410.
- Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.


