1816-74031991-7074
Business Perspectives
  • Login

Editorial office contact form

Please complete all required fields!

Please specify your request here

Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Should not be empty
Captcha Refresh Invalid data

Your request has been successfully sent.

Your Cart

Price Total
€0.00

(₴0)

Proceed to Checkout
Your cart is empty
Cart 0 Items
Submit Manuscript
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publishing policies
  • Editorial Policies
  • Books
FOLLOW US
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Banks and Bank Systems
  • Issue #4
  • Environmental, social, and governance practices and financial performance of Armenian commercial banks

Environmental, social, and governance practices and financial performance of Armenian commercial banks

  • Received April 1, 2026;
    Accepted September 24, 2026;
    Published October 19, 2026
  • Author(s)
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9884-5404
    Armen Hakobyan
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7022-0100
    Zaven Margaryan
    ORCID Researcher ID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(4).2026.03
  • Article Info
    Volume 21 2026, Issue #4, pp. 40–51
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • 19 Views
  • 1 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
ESG integration has become increasingly relevant to banking-sector performance, particularly in emerging markets where standardized external ESG ratings remain limited. This study aims to examine the association between ESG performance and the financial performance of selected Armenian commercial banks and to assess the relative role of the Environmental, Social, and Governance dimensions. The study uses a multi-method design based on 27 bank-year observations for Ardshinbank OJSC, Ameriabank CJSC, and ACBA Bank OJSC over 2017–2025, combining a disclosure-based ESG framework, descriptive analysis, Pearson correlation, Ordinary Least Squares regression, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, and evidence from 52 banking professionals. Overall ESG performance is positively associated with ROA (r = 0.64) and ROE (r = 0.60) and negatively associated with the Cost-to-Income ratio (r = −0.52). In the OLS analysis, Governance, Environmental, and Social dimensions show positive estimated relationships with ROA, with coefficients of 0.037 (p = 0.001), 0.023 (p = 0.012), and 0.019 (p = 0.018), respectively. Governance therefore demonstrates the strongest estimated association among the three dimensions. The MCDA framework assigns weights of 45% to Governance, 30% to Environmental, and 25% to Social factors, providing additional evidence of the relative importance of governance-related practices. The findings provide preliminary evidence of positive ESG–financial performance associations in the selected Armenian banks, while the results should be interpreted as exploratory and associational rather than causal due to the limited sample.

view full abstract hide full abstract
  • PAPER PROFILE
  • AUTHORS CONTRIBUTIONS
  • FIGURES
  • TABLES
  • REFERENCES
  • Keywords
    Armenia, commercial banks, corporate governance, ESG, financial performance, sustainability
  • JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)
    C58, G21, G34, Q56
  • References
    17
  • Tables
    0
  • Figures
    0
    • Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451-4469.
    • Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 7(4), 283-288.
    • Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19.
    • Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.
    • Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
    • Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176-1248.
    • Cornett, M. M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2016). Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of U.S. commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 70, 137-159.
    • Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693-714.
    • Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
    • Gibson Brandon, R., Krueger, P., & Schmidt, P. S. (2021). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4), 104-127.
    • Hakobyan, A. A., & Margaryan, Z. G. (2025). Aspects of assessing the financial performance of commercial banks in Armenia within the scope of ESG. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(4), 2694-2703.
    • Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304-329.
    • Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
    • Minton, B. A., Taillard, J. P., & Williamson, R. (2014). Financial expertise of the board, risk taking, and performance: Evidence from bank holding companies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(2), 351-380.
    • Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
    • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
    • Wu, M.-W., & Shen, C.-H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529-3547.
    • Conceptualization
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Data curation
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Formal Analysis
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Funding acquisition
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Investigation
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Methodology
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Project administration
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Resources
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Software
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Supervision
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Validation
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Visualization
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Writing – original draft
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
    • Writing – review & editing
      Armen Hakobyan, Zaven Margaryan
Related Articles
  • ESG disclosure and financial performance: Empirical study of Vietnamese commercial banks

    Bui Thi Thu LoanORCID , Tran Thi Lan AnhORCID , Trang Hoang doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.19(1).2024.18
    Banks and Bank Systems Volume 19, 2024         Issue #1         pp. 208-220 Views: 12981 Downloads: 3611 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure becomes vital for banks to be transparent and accountable for their investments and lending decisions to shareholders, regulators, and society. The potential enhancement of shareholder value through ESG disclosure is still inconsistent. Empirical studies on the association between ESG disclosure and financial performance are mixed and limited in emerging economies. This study aims to examine whether ESG disclosure impacts the financial performance of 24 Vietnamese commercial banks in terms of return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and net interest margin (NIM). The study uses the feasible generalized least squares estimation method based on panel data from 2018 to 2022. The study employs content analysis on 12 themes related to environmental, social, and governance pillars to score policy disclosure based on the Fair Finance Guide Methodology. The results highlight the positive effects of ESG policy disclosure, individual environment disclosure (E), and individual governance disclosure (G) on bank financial performance. Notably, ESG, E, and G have the largest influence on ROE, with coefficients of 0.051, 0.036, and 0.027, respectively, at a 5% significance level. However, the study does not provide evidence of a statistically significant association between social disclosure and financial performance. These results provide empirical evidence for regulators and bank managers to shape ESG policies and practices aligning with international standards.

    Acknowledgment
    ESG disclosure score of 11 banks as primary data in this study is conducted under the project coordinated by the Fair Finance Vietnam coalition, as part of Fair Finance International.

  • Green perceived value and green product purchase intention of Gen Z consumers: Moderating role of environmental concern

    Syarifah HudayahORCID , Melda Aulia RamadhaniORCID , Kezia Arum SaryORCID , Sugeng RaharjoORCID , Rizky YudaruddinORCID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(2).2023.07
    Environmental Economics Volume 14, 2023         Issue #2         pp. 87-102 Views: 8571 Downloads: 1702 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The primary objective of this study is to examine the connection between Generation Z Indonesian consumers’ perceptions of value for green products and their purchase intentions, with a supplementary investigation into how environmental concerns moderate the influence of perceived green value on their intention to purchase green products. Between June and December 2021, a probability sampling technique, specifically stratified random sampling, was used to select a sample of 543 Indonesian Generation Z consumers. The data were analyzed using a variance-based method, namely partial least squares, within the context of structural equation modeling. The analysis reveals that functional value, conditional value, and environmental concern significantly and positively affect the intention to purchase green products. This indicates that Generation Z consumers are more inclined to choose green products when they perceive them to have good functional value, when specific conditions or requirements support the purchase, and when they have a high environmental concern. Moreover, environmental concern moderates the effect of social value on the intention to purchase green products. This suggests that more environmentally conscious consumers are more likely to be influenced by social value benefits when deciding to buy green products, highlighting the complex interplay between environmental and social motivations in shaping consumer behavior towards sustainability.

  • Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?

    Patrick VelteORCID Researcher ID doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.02
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017         Issue #2         pp. 19-35 Views: 6894 Downloads: 2508 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.

< Prev Next >
Download Preview
Close
Banks and Bank Systems
Banks and Bank Systems
  • Issue #4
  • Journal Homepage
  • Indexed/Abstracted
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Policies and Publication Ethics
  • Submission Guidelines for Authors
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Acceptance rate
  • Self-Archiving Policy
  • Article processing charge
 

COOKIES
The cookie settings on this website are set to 'allow all cookies' to give you the best experience.

If you continue without changing these settings, you consent to this Read more

Accept
newsletter
We accept payment with:
  • visa
  • mastercard
  • ISNI: 0000 0004 6439 8257
  • Copyright © 2026 LLC “CPC “Business Perspectives”,
    except Open Access articles

Developed by MindK. Designed by Crisp.

  • About Us
    • Company
    • News
    • Cooperation and partners
    • Advertising
    • Manuscript Administration System
  • Users support
    • Your profile
    • External services instructions
    • Site navigation
Contact us
  • Hryhorii Skovoroda lane, 10 Sumy, 40022 , Ukraine
  • +380-542-221707
  • +38-063-2891070
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Tweets by LLC “Business Perspectives”
DMCA.com Protection Status