Environmental, social, and governance practices and financial performance of Armenian commercial banks
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(4).2026.03
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2026, Issue #4, pp. 40–51
- 19 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
ESG integration has become increasingly relevant to banking-sector performance, particularly in emerging markets where standardized external ESG ratings remain limited. This study aims to examine the association between ESG performance and the financial performance of selected Armenian commercial banks and to assess the relative role of the Environmental, Social, and Governance dimensions. The study uses a multi-method design based on 27 bank-year observations for Ardshinbank OJSC, Ameriabank CJSC, and ACBA Bank OJSC over 2017–2025, combining a disclosure-based ESG framework, descriptive analysis, Pearson correlation, Ordinary Least Squares regression, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, and evidence from 52 banking professionals. Overall ESG performance is positively associated with ROA (r = 0.64) and ROE (r = 0.60) and negatively associated with the Cost-to-Income ratio (r = −0.52). In the OLS analysis, Governance, Environmental, and Social dimensions show positive estimated relationships with ROA, with coefficients of 0.037 (p = 0.001), 0.023 (p = 0.012), and 0.019 (p = 0.018), respectively. Governance therefore demonstrates the strongest estimated association among the three dimensions. The MCDA framework assigns weights of 45% to Governance, 30% to Environmental, and 25% to Social factors, providing additional evidence of the relative importance of governance-related practices. The findings provide preliminary evidence of positive ESG–financial performance associations in the selected Armenian banks, while the results should be interpreted as exploratory and associational rather than causal due to the limited sample.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C58, G21, G34, Q56
-
References17
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451-4469.
- Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 7(4), 283-288.
- Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19.
- Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.
- Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
- Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176-1248.
- Cornett, M. M., Erhemjamts, O., & Tehranian, H. (2016). Greed or good deeds: An examination of the relation between corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of U.S. commercial banks around the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 70, 137-159.
- Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019). Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(3), 693-714.
- Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
- Gibson Brandon, R., Krueger, P., & Schmidt, P. S. (2021). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4), 104-127.
- Hakobyan, A. A., & Margaryan, Z. G. (2025). Aspects of assessing the financial performance of commercial banks in Armenia within the scope of ESG. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(4), 2694-2703.
- Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304-329.
- Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
- Minton, B. A., Taillard, J. P., & Williamson, R. (2014). Financial expertise of the board, risk taking, and performance: Evidence from bank holding companies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(2), 351-380.
- Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
- Wu, M.-W., & Shen, C.-H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529-3547.


