The effect of social CRM capability components on service innovation in Vietnamese commercial banks: The mediating role of customer knowledge
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(3).2026.13
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2026, Issue #3, pp. 191–206
- 17 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Commercial banks invest heavily in social media to manage customer relationships; however, it remains unclear which components of social CRM capability drive service innovation and through what mechanism. This study aims to determine how each component of social CRM capability – information generation, information dissemination, and market responsiveness – affects service innovation in Vietnamese commercial banks, and to what extent customer knowledge mediates these effects. In May 2026, an online questionnaire was distributed among 800 managers and specialists who operate social media channels and develop services at Vietnamese commercial banks; 372 valid responses were analyzed by partial least squares structural equation modeling. Market responsiveness has the largest direct effect on service innovation (β = 0.225, p < 0.001); information dissemination has a weaker direct effect (β = 0.146, p = 0.010), whereas information generation has no direct effect (β = 0.043, p = 0.418) and operates entirely through customer knowledge (indirect effect = 0.084). Information dissemination carries the largest coefficient on customer knowledge (β = 0.310, p < 0.001), and customer knowledge in turn positively affects service innovation (β = 0.362, p < 0.001). The model explains 35.4% of the variance in customer knowledge and 40.1% of the variance in service innovation. Bootstrap tests show only the advantage of market responsiveness over information generation to be significant. Banks should therefore treat responsiveness and cross-functional dissemination as complements rather than alternatives.
Acknowledgment
This research is partly funded by the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City and the University of Finance – Marketing.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D83, G21, M31, O31, Z13
-
References43
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Proposed research model
- Figure 2. Structural model results
-
- Table 1. Profile of the 372 survey respondents
- Table 2. Means, standard deviations, and correlation matrix of the study constructs (n = 372)
- Table 3. Measurement model assessment
- Table 4. Discriminant validity assessment using the HTMT criterion
- Table 5. Hypothesis testing results
- Table A1. Measurement items
-
- Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.
- Arora, L., Singh, P., Bhatt, V., & Sharma, B. (2021). Understanding and managing customer engagement through social customer relationship management. Journal of Decision Systems, 30(2-3), 215-234.
- Becker, J.-M., Cheah, J.-H., Gholamzade, R., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 321-346.
- Bratianu, C., Stănescu, D. F., & Mocanu, R. (2023). The mediating role of customer knowledge management on the innovative work behavior and product innovation relationship. Kybernetes, 52(11), 5353-5384.
- Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
- Broby, D. (2021). Financial technology and the future of banking. Financial Innovation, 7, 47.
- Cao, G., & Weerawardena, J. (2023). Strategic use of social media in marketing and financial performance: The B2B SME context. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 41-54.
- Chaithanapat, P., Punnakitikashem, P., Khin Khin Oo, N. C., & Rakthin, S. (2022). Relationships among knowledge-oriented leadership, customer knowledge management, innovation quality and firm performance in SMEs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(1), 100162.
- Choi, H.-J., Ahn, J.-C., Jung, S.-H., & Kim, J.-H. (2020). Communities of practice and knowledge management systems: Effects on knowledge management activities and innovation performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(1), 53-68.
- Ferm, L.-E. C., & Thaichon, P. (2021). Value co-creation and social media: Investigating antecedents and influencing factors in the U.S. retail banking industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102548.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127-142.
- Guerola-Navarro, V., Gil-Gómez, H., Oltra-Badenes, R., & Sendra-García, J. (2021). Customer relationship management and its impact on innovation: A literature review. Journal of Business Research, 129, 83-87.
- Haefner, N., Wincent, J., Parida, V., & Gassmann, O. (2021). Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120392.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Jayachandran, S., Sharma, S., Kaufman, P., & Raman, P. (2005). The role of relational information processes and technology use in customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 177-192.
- Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261.
- Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
- Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467-477.
- Kumar, P., Sharma, S. K., & Dutot, V. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled CRM capability in healthcare: The impact on service innovation. International Journal of Information Management, 69, 102598.
- Lamrhari, S., El Ghazi, H., Oubrich, M., & El Faker, A. (2022). A social CRM analytic framework for improving customer retention, acquisition, and conversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121275.
- Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155-175.
- Mata, M. N., Moleiro Martins, J., & Inácio, P. L. (2024). Collaborative innovation, strategic agility, & absorptive capacity adoption in SMEs: The moderating effects of customer knowledge management capability. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(4), 1116-1140.
- Migdadi, M. M. (2021). Knowledge management, customer relationship management and innovation capabilities. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(1), 111-124.
- Naimi-Sadigh, A., Asgari, T., & Rabiei, M. (2022). Digital transformation in the value chain disruption of banking services. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 1212-1242.
- Nguyen, H. T., Pham, T. K. T., Nguyen, T. T. H., & Nguyen, T. H. (2025a). Integrating social customer relationship management into customer lifetime value: Empirical evidence from Vietnamese banking. Innovative Marketing, 21(3), 142-154.
- Nguyen, H. T., Tran, N. G., Bui, H. K., Pham, T. K. T., & Pham, T. H. N. (2025b). Social customer relationship management and customer lifecycle value in banking: The mediating and moderating roles of engagement. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(3), 129-144.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
- Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 17-61.
- Qalati, S. A., Jiang, M., Gyedu, S., & Manu, E. K. (2024). Do strong innovation capability and environmental turbulence influence the nexus between CRM and business performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(8), 7887-7904.
- Schulze, A., Townsend, J. D., & Talay, M. B. (2022). Completing the market orientation matrix: The impact of proactive competitor orientation on innovation and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 103, 198-214.
- Sharma, P. N., Liengaard, B. D., Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2023). Predictive model assessment and selection in composite-based modeling using PLS-SEM: Extensions and guidelines for using CVPAT. European Journal of Marketing, 57(6), 1662-1677.
- Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
- Song, J., Lee, K.-B., Zhou, Z., Jia, L., Cegielski, C., & Shin, S. I. (2022). Enhancing supply chain sensing capability through social media: An environmental scanning perspective. Information Technology & People, 35(1), 367-391.
- Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
- Trainor, K. J., Andzulis, J., Rapp, A., & Agnihotri, R. (2014). Social media technology usage and customer relationship performance: A capabilities-based examination of social CRM. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1201-1208.
- Witell, L., Snyder, H., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2863-2872.
- Xie, X., Wang, H., & Sendra García, F. J. (2021). How does customer involvement in service innovation motivate service innovation performance? The roles of relationship learning and knowledge absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 136, 630-643.
- Xin, X., Miao, X., Chen, Q., & Shang, T. (2022). User participation, knowledge management capability and service innovation: E-commerce enterprises in the digital age. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(4), 629-646.
- Zhang, L., & Yi, Y. (2024). Network embeddedness and service innovation: The mediating role of knowledge co-creation and the moderating role of digital transformation. Service Business, 18(3), 523-553.
- Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.
- Zhao, Y., Peng, B., Iqbal, K., & Wan, A. (2023). Does market orientation promote enterprise digital innovation? Based on the survey data of China’s digital core industries. Industrial Marketing Management, 109, 135-145.


