Perceived ESG disclosure and credit decision-making orientation: The mediating role of intention to use sustainability information in an emerging market
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(3).2026.19
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2026, Issue #3, pp. 293–308
- 9 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Integrating environmental, social, and governance factors into the credit granting process is an imperative requirement for financial risk management. This study aims to quantify the impact of the perceived corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information disclosure on Credit Decision-Making Orientation and determine the mediating role of the intention to use sustainability information. Research data were collected through a survey of 235 credit officers and managers at 32 commercial banks in Vietnam from February to August 2024 and subsequently analyzed utilizing partial least squares structural equation modeling. The empirical results indicate that the disclosure levels of environmental, social, and governance information do not have a direct impact on credit decision-making orientation. However, these three factors positively affect the intention to use sustainability information, wherein the environmental factor exerts the most substantial influence (β = 0.447), followed by governance (β = 0.416) and social factors (β = 0.363). Furthermore, the intention to use sustainability information acts as a full mediator, exerting a strong positive impact on credit decision-making orientation (β = 0.558) and explaining 26.2% of the variance in the dependent variable. The study concludes that subjective credit appraisal orientations among banking personnel are primarily driven by their cognitive intention to integrate sustainability data rather than the mere presence of corporate disclosures.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, M14, Q56, G41
-
References47
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Proposed model and hypotheses
- Figure 2. PLS-SEM structural model analysis results
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of the survey sample (N = 235)
- Table 2. Measurement matrix for the research model
- Table 3. Reliability and convergent validity assessment results
- Table 4. Discriminant validity assessment results (HTMT)
- Table 5. Hypothesis testing and mediation effects results
- Table 6. Predictive power assessment results (PLSpredict)
-
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
- Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
- Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451-4469.
- Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315-342.
- Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1-2), 203-243.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2021). Climate-related financial risks - measurement methodologies. Bank for International Settlements.
- Basu, S., Vitanza, J., Wang, W., & Zhu, X. R. (2022). Walking the walk? Bank ESG disclosures and home mortgage lending. Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 779-821.
- Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344.
- Bhojraj, S., & Sengupta, P. (2003). Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors. The Journal of Business, 76(3), 455-475.
- Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021). Do investors care about carbon risk? Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 517-549.
- Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223-2247.
- Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147-175.
- Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176-1248.
- Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
- Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary non-financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
- Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
- El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
- Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64.
- Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499-516.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
- Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
- Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI Standards 2021.
- Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. A. (2017). Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Hao, Y., Chen, H.-W., Wang, K., Tseng, Y., & Chen, T.-K. (2025). Readability of ESG topic-specific sustainability reports and bank loan spreads [Paper presentation]. European Financial Management Association 2025 Annual Meeting, Greece.
- Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 405-440.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures. International Sustainability Standards Board.
- Ilhan, E., Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2023). Climate risk disclosure and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 36(7), 2617-2650.
- Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2017). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting (Harvard Business School Research Working Paper No. 11-100).
- Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218.
- Keysight Technologies. (2022). 2021 Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards Data Report.
- Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
- 36. Krueger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304-329.
- Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824.
- Liu, H., Deng, Y., Liu, Q., & Xia, X. (2025). Mandatory ESG disclosure and trade credit: International evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(1), 769-787.
- OECD. (2023). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023. OECD Publishing.
- Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
- Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
- Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
- Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Financial Stability Board.
- Thompson, P., & Cowton, C. J. (2004). Bringing the environment into bank lending: Implications for environmental reporting. The British Accounting Review, 36(2), 197-218.
- Wang, L. L. (2023). Transmission effects of ESG disclosure regulations through bank lending networks. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(3), 935-978.
- Weber, O. (2012). Environmental credit risk management in banks and financial service institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(4), 248-263.
- Yang, Y., Du, Z., Zhang, Z., Tong, G., & Zhou, R. (2021). Does ESG disclosure affect corporate-bond credit spreads? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(15), Article 8500.


