Sustainable economic goals based on determinants of resource productivity in the Netherlands and Hungary

  • 67 Views
  • 9 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Resource productivity has become an important indicator of sustainable economic growth in a situation when natural resources are becoming scarce and environmental stress is growing. This paper examines the drivers of resource productivity in the case of the Netherlands and Hungary, two countries featuring diversified economies and contexts. This paper evaluates the contribution of waste management, renewable energy sources, human capital, investment, and innovation to sustainability by adopting a combined methods approach. Data from Eurostat and ODYSSEE databases, covering the period from 2011 to 2021, were analyzed using time series comparison and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results indicate that factors such as employment rate, gross fixed capital formation (GFCF), waste recycling, and renewable energy significantly influence resource productivity. The results indicated absolute decoupling for the Netherlands, represented by a 40% increase in productivity with an 11% reduction in materials. In comparison, Hungary recorded relative decoupling with GDP and material consumption increasing by about 49% and 37%, respectively. These findings underpin the importance of tailored policies for the enhancement of resource efficiency and sustainable development.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Q-Q plot of normality
    • Figure 2. SEM of resource productivity
    • Figure 3. Employment rate in the Netherlands and in Hungary from 2011 to 2021
    • Figure 4. Decoupling in examined countries
    • Table 1. Output of normality test
    • Table 2. Cook’s distance statistics for influential observations detection
    • Table 3. Model fit test results
    • Table 4. Growth of resource productivity and its elements (2011–2022)
    • Table A1. Descriptive statistics of the sample with normality test and extreme outliers test
    • Table A2. Direct, indirect, and total effects of SEM
    • Investigation
      Botond Géza Kálmán
    • Methodology
      Botond Géza Kálmán
    • Project administration
      Botond Géza Kálmán
    • Resources
      Botond Géza Kálmán
    • Writing – review & editing
      Botond Géza Kálmán, Szilárd Malatyinszki
    • Conceptualization
      Laszlo Vasa
    • Data curation
      Laszlo Vasa
    • Formal Analysis
      Laszlo Vasa
    • Funding acquisition
      Laszlo Vasa
    • Writing – original draft
      Laszlo Vasa
    • Software
      Szilárd Malatyinszki
    • Supervision
      Szilárd Malatyinszki
    • Validation
      Szilárd Malatyinszki
    • Visualization
      Szilárd Malatyinszki