How proactive personality affects lecturer innovative behavior: A mediation perspective
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(2).2025.24
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #2, pp. 342-356
- 17 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
A proactive personality is crucial for individuals and organizations, including lecturers in higher education institutions. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate how proactive personalities affect the innovative behavior of Indonesian lecturers through the sequential mediation of job involvement, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior. The paper employed a quantitative approach, and the data were operationalized through a survey using a Likert-scale questionnaire. The sample included 230 lecturers at private universities in Indonesia spread across four provinces (Central Jawa, West Jawa, Jakarta, and Banten). Correlational matrices and descriptive statistics supported data analysis using structural equation modeling. The results demonstrate a significant relationship between lecturers’ proactive personality and job involvement, organizational commitment, and innovative behavior. Additionally, a proactive personality influences innovative behavior through job involvement, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior. This study produces a new empirical model that explains how proactive personalities affect lecturers’ innovative behavior through job involvement, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D23, I20, I23, O31
-
References64
-
Tables3
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Standardized structural model
- Figure 2. T value structural model
-
- Table 1. Measurement model
- Table 2. Hypothesis testing results
- Table A1. Research variables, indicators, and items
-
- Abu-Bader, S., & Jones, T. V. (2021). Statistical mediation analysis using the Sobel test and Hayes SPSS process macro. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 9(1), 42-61.
- Ahmad, I., Gao, Y., Su, F., & Khan, M. K. (2023). Linking ethical leadership to followers’ innovative work behavior in Pakistan: The vital roles of psychological safety and proactive personality. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(3), 755-772.
- Albdareen, R., AL-Gharaibeh, S., Alraqqad, R., & Maswadeh, S. (2024). The impact of ethical leadership on employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 521-532.
- Al-Ahmadi, A., & Mahran, S. (2022). Organizational citizenship behavior and job satisfaction from the nurses’ perspective. Evidence-Based Nursing Research, 4(1), 17-24.
- Baety, N., & Rojuaniah, R. (2022). Servant leadership, organizational culture and organizational citizenship behavior on innovative work behavior. Management Analysis Journal, 11(1), 83-94.
- Bastian, A., & Widodo, W. (2022). How innovative behavior affects lecturers’ task performance: A mediation perspective. Emerging Science Journal, 6(Special Issue), 123-136.
- Bhawna, Sharma, S. K., & Gautam, P. K. (2024). The influence of subordinates’ proactive personality, supervisors’ I-deals on subordinates’ affective commitment and occupational well-being: Mediating role of subordinates’ I-deals. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 16(1), 48-64.
- Bozdoğan, S. C. (2021). The mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior and voice behavior in the relationship between proactive personality and job performance. Alanya Academic Review, 5(2), 1069-1085.
- Chang, Y., Kim, C., & Yoo, J. (2024). Does justice matter? Evaluating the usefulness of commitment and innovative work behavior as a predictor of turnover intention of Korean employees. Sustainability, 16(3), Article 1054.
- Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7.
- De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2018). Innovative work behaviour and performance-related pay: Rewarding the individual or the collective? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(12), 1900-1919.
- Dewi, A.A.A.K., Kepramereni, P., Widyani, A. A. D., & Suardhika, I.N. (2023). Innovative behavior: A mediating factor in the impact of organizational culture and organizational commitment on employee performance. Social Science and Humanities Journal (SSHJ), 7(11), 3257-3267.
- Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187.
- Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192-3198.
- Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
- Hermawan, H., Thamrin, H. M., & Susilo, P. (2020). Organizational citizenship behavior and performance: The role of employee engagement. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(12), 1089-1097.
- Hutomo, P. T. P. (2023). Analysis of innovative behavior on employee performance study of PO Fit and OCB of culinary SMES in Semarang City. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 38(sp_1), 1159-1178.
- Jalil, M. F., Ullah, W., & Ahmed, Z. (2021). Training perception and innovative behavior of SME employees: Examining the mediating effects of firm commitment. SAGE Open, 11(4).
- Jankelová, N., Joniaková, Z., & Mišún, J. (2021). Innovative work behavior – A key factor in business performance? The role of team cognitive diversity and teamwork climate in this relationship. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4).
- Jyoti, J., Sharma, P., Kour, S., & Kour, H. (2021). The role of job involvement and career commitment between person–job fit and organizational commitment: A study of higher education sector. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(1), 109-130.
- Kale, E. (2019). Proaktif kişilik ve kontrol odağının, kariyer tatmini ve yenilikçi iş davranışına etkisi [The impact of proactive personality and locus of control on career satisfaction and innovative work behavior]. Journal of Tourism Theory and Research, 5(2), 144-154. (In Turkish).
- Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284-296.
- Klotz, A. C., Bolino, M. C., Song, H., & Stornelli, J. (2018). Examining the nature, causes, and consequences of profiles of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), 629-647.
- Kock, N. (2021). Harman’s single factor test in PLS-SEM: Checking for common method bias. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 2(2), 1-6.
- Kumar, H., Rao, N. A., Kamal, G., Vinod, M., Leelavathi, T. S., Sripathi, M., & Kumari, N. Y. (2023). The role of organizational citizenship behavior as an intervening variable in the relationship between employee engagement and gig workers’ productivity in India. Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 183-198.
- Kundu, S. C., Kumar, S., & Lata, K. (2019). Effects of perceived role clarity on innovative work behavior: A multiple mediation model. RAUSP Management Journal, 55(4), 457-472.
- Liao, P.-Y. (2021). Linking proactive personality to well-being: The mediating role of person-environment fit. SAGE Open, 11(3).
- Ma Prieto, I., & Pilar Perez-Santana, M. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: The role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184-208.
- Mazayed, K., Khan, M. S., Kundi, G. M., Qureshi, Q. A., Akhtar, R., & Bilal, H. (2014). Assessing the impact of job involvement and commitment on organizational productivity in the Arab/Gulf Countries. Industrial Engineering Letters, 4(3), 18-22.
- McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. (2020). Organizational behavior: Emerging knowledge, global reality. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
- Mubarak, N., Khan, J., Yasmin, R., & Osmadi, A. (2021). The impact of a proactive personality on innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(7), 989-1003.
- Murniasih, F. (2023). The role of proactive personality on transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Psychocentrum Review, 5(1), 29-41.
- Ni, D., & Zheng, X. (2024). Do proactive peers inhibit employee innovative behavior? The roles of team cooperative climate and sense of power. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 152, Article 104017.
- Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2021). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Organ, D. W. (2018). The roots of organizational citizenship behavior. In Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational citizenship behavior (pp. 7-18). Oxford University Press.
- Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. SAGE Publications.
- Ozkurt, B., & Alpay, C. B. (2018). Investigation of proactive personality characteristics of the students of high school of physical education and sports through various variables. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 150-155.
- Prasetyo, Kusmaningtyas, A., & Nugroho, R. (2021). Effect of job involvement on employee performance through work engagement at Bank Jatim. Universal Journal of Management, 9(2), 29-37.
- Riana, I. G. (2021). Influence of spiritual leadership, organizational commitment and its effect on the performance of Lembaga Perkreditan Desa. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 1111-1124.
- Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2020). How to prevent, detect and control common method variance in electronic commerce research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 1-5.
- Salessi, S. M., & Omar, A. G. (2019). Job involvement in current research: Update and state of the art. Papeles del Psicólogo/Psychologist, 40(1), 46-56.
- Schultz, D., & Schultz, S. E. (2016). Psychology and work today. New York: Routledge.
- Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845-874.
- Shahid, Z., Niazi, A. A. K., Qazi, T. F., & Sandhu, K. Y. (2020). Impact of proactive personality and corporate social responsibility on job performance: Mediating role of organizational commitment. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 10(1), 118-126.
- Sridadi, A. R., Pratama, A. S., Eliyana, A., Gunawan, D. R., & Yazid, Z. (2024). Fostering organizational citizenship behavior: The role of proactive personality, job satisfaction, and affective commitment. SAGE Open, 14(3).
- Stoffers, J. M., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Jacobs, E. A. (2020). Employability and innovative work behaviour in small and medium-sized enterprises. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(11), 1439-1466.
- Sun, J., Li, W. D., Li, Y., Liden, R. C., Li, S., & Zhang, X. (2021). Unintended consequences of being proactive? Linking proactive personality to coworker envy, helping, and undermining, and the moderating role of prosocial motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(2), 250-267.
- Takaishi, K., Sekiguchi, K., Kono, H., & Suzuki, S. (2019). Interactive effects of work autonomy and proactive personality on innovative behavior. Asian Business Research, 4(1), 6-16.
- Tan, A. B., Van Dun, D. H., & Wilderom, C. P. (2021). Innovative work behavior in Singapore evoked by transformational leaders through innovation support and readiness. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(4), 697-712.
- Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142-168.
- Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471.
- Torlak, N. G., Budur, T., & Khan, N. U. S. (2024). Links connecting organizational socialization, affective commitment and innovative work behavior. The Learning Organization, 31(2), 227-249.
- Ullah, I., Elahi, N. S., Abid, G., & Butt, M. U. (2020). The impact of perceived organizational support and proactive personality on affective commitment: Mediating role of prosocial motivation. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 18(2), 183-205.
- Ullah, I., Hameed, R. M., & Mahmood, A. (2024). The impact of proactive personality and psychological capital on innovative work behavior: Evidence from software houses of Pakistan. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(6), 1967-1985.
- Van Zyl, L. E., Van Oort, A., Rispens, S., & Olckers, C. (2021). Work engagement and task performance within a global Dutch ICT-consulting firm: The mediating role of innovative work behaviors. Current Psychology, 40(8), 4012-4023.
- Wang, P., & Hou, Y. (2023). How does commitment affect employee’s innovative behavior? A time-lagged study. SAGE Open, 13(4).
- Widodo, W., & Mawarto, M. (2020). Investigating the role of innovative behavior in mediating the effect of transformational leadership and talent management on performance. Management Science Letters, 10(10), 2175-2182.
- Widodo, W., Sumadyo, B., Suparman, H., & Tjitrosumarto, S. (2024). Developing teachers’ professional performance based on dual intelligence: A mediation perspective. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(5), 2864-2875.
- Wijaya, N. H. S., Haryokusumo, D., & Akbar, M. D. (2021). Employee involvement, job satisfaction, and in-role performance. Diponegoro International Journal of Business, 4(1), 42-48.
- Xiong, L., & King, C. (2018). Too much of a good thing? Examining how proactive personality affects employee brand performance under formal and informal organizational support. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 68, 12-22.
- Yu, M., & Lee, H. (2018). Impact of resilience and job involvement on turnover intention of new graduate nurses using structural equation modeling. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 15(4), 351-362.
- Zhang, Z., Fang, H., Luan, Y., Chen, Q., & Peng, J. (2022). A meta-analysis of proactive personality and career success: The mediating effects of task performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 979412.