Working hours of the future: AI technologies, collective synergy, and biorhythms as the foundation for productive work
-
Author(s)Taras KytsakLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0525-7556
,
Denys OvsiannykovLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8654-6969
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/slrtp.15(1).2025.01
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2025, Issue #1, pp. 1-10
- 40 Views
-
13 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This article explores the potential of integrating biological rhythms, artificial intelligence (AI), and collective synergy to create adaptive work schedules that meet both individual needs and organizational objectives. The paper emphasizes the misalignment of traditional static schedules with natural circadian rhythms, highlighting the negative effects on productivity, well-being, and stress levels. The study aims to demonstrate how AI-driven technologies, combined with biometric data from wearable devices, can optimize work schedules to improve cognitive performance by 20-30%, as evidenced by recent studies.
The proposed methodology leverages AI to process physiological and cognitive data, tailoring individual work schedules while ensuring team synchronization through collective synergy. By creating "synchronization windows" for collaborative tasks, AI mitigates the loss of collective efficiency often associated with flexible schedules. The article provides a framework for implementing this model, emphasizing the balance between flexibility and team interaction, supported by technologies such as fitness trackers and machine learning algorithms.
The findings underscore the practical value of integrating AI in workforce management, offering organizations a pathway to enhance productivity by 15-20% and reduce employee turnover. This study contributes to the discourse on modern work optimization by bridging individual productivity, technological advancements, and collective efficiency, presenting a dynamic, future-oriented approach to work scheduling.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J22, О30
-
References18
-
Tables2
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Disadvantages and threats of reducing working hours
- Figure 2. Advantages and disadvantages of static and flexible schedules
- Figure 3. Scheme for implementing biological indicators, artificial intelligence technologies, and the concept of collective synergy in creating a work schedule
-
- Table 1. Reasons behind the motivation to reduce working hours
- Table 2. Comparison of different work-week models
-
- Bernstein, E., & Turban, S. (2018). The impact of the ‘open’ workspace on human collaboration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1753), 20170239.
- Bottenheft, C., Brouwer, A.-M., Stuldreher, I., Groen, E., & van Erp, J. (2021). Cognitive task performance under (combined) conditions of a metabolic and sensory stressor. Cognition, Technology & Work, 23, 805-817.
- Clopton, A. (2011). Social capital and team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 17(7/8), 369-381.
- Gallup. (2024). State of the global workplace report.
- Giattino, C., Ortiz-Ospina, E., & Roser, M. (2020). Working hours. Our World in Data.
- Glaveski, S. (2018). The case for the 6-hour workday. Harvard Business Review.
- Haraldsson, G., & Kellam, J. (2021). Going public: Iceland’s journey to a shorter working week. The Autonomy Institute.
- Huberman, M., & Minns, C. (2007). The times they are not changin’: Days and hours of work in Old and New Worlds, 1870-2000. Explorations in Economic History, 44(4), 538-567.
- Hyysalo, J., Oivo, M., & Kuvaja, P. (2017). A design theory for cognitive workflow systems. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 27(01), 125-151.
- ILO. (2019). Work for a brighter future (global commission on the future of work).
- McParlane, P. (2023). What is Microsoft 4 day work week? Plus research results. 4dayweek.
- Newport, C. (2016). Deep work: Rules for focused success in a distracted world. New York: Grand Central Publishing.
- OECD. (2024). OECD compendium of productivity indicators 2024.
- Pencavel, J. (2015). The productivity of working hours. The Economic Journal, 125(589), 2052-2076.
- Rungta, I. (2024). The future of work: How remote and hybrid models are redefining workplace dynamics, productivity, culture, and employee well - being. International Journal of Science and Research, 13(9), 1376-1377.
- Vise, D., & Malseed, M. (2006). The google story: Inside the hottest business, media, and technology success of our time. Stuttgart: Delta.
- Walker, M. (2018). Why we sleep: Unlocking the power of sleep and dreams. New York: Scribner.
- Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., & Teevan, J. (2021). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 43-52.
