Trust as an institute in the mirror of new challenges, imperatives and possibilities of socio-economic development
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/slrtp.8(2).2018.02
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2018, Issue #2, pp. 8-26
- Cited by
- 967 Views
-
176 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Dynamic transformations of traditional horizontal and vertical links in the new, – network, – economy, increase the importance of trust as a fundamental principle of constructing effective socio-economic relations. The relevance of the study is contingent on the increase of the role, significance, functional load on social capital, which is based on the trust institute. The scientific and practical significance of the study lies in the identification of phenomena and processes that are a kind of “thrombi” on the path to the development of the institute of trust, and the substantiation of the modern scientific platform for the further development of a road map for building a trust society. The results of the study are aimed at substantiating the institute of trust in the system of factors of socio-economic development. The subject of the study is the theoretical and applied principles of the social phenomenon of trust in the conditions of the challenges and imperatives of the new economy. The methodological basis for achieving the set goal is a systematic approach in the research of trust as a system-forming dominant of social wealth. The purpose of the study is the scientific and theoretical substantiation of the construction of trust relations in the context of the possibilities of social and economic development. The carrier of relationships – a person, who is active, conscious, possesses knowledge, ethical norms, and motivational guidelines; is the bearer of socially significant moral and cultural values, is situated in the foreground of the concept of trust, which authors adhere to. On the basis of generalization of existing theoretical developments in the sphere of trust the modern scientific and practical angle of this phenomenon has been highlighted; the benefits that society receives from a high level of trust has been revealed; prerequisites of trust have been identified; the leading role of trust in formation and reproduction of social capital has been proven; the failure of the state in the development of the trust institute has been substantiated. Trust has been emphasized as a relationship of a bilateral reciprocal nature on the part of its counterparties. The authors argue that trust is a fundamental phenomenon, a process of both socio-economic relations and the functioning of public institutions and permeates the entire spectrum of horizontal and vertical connections that are formed in society.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)А130
-
References26
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Arrow, K. (1972). Gifts and Exchanges. Philosophy and public affairs, 1(4), 343-362.
- Castaldo, S. (2002). Meanings of trust: a meta analysis of trust definitions. Presented at the annual conference on innovative research in management, European academy of management (9-12 may). Stockholm.
- Colemann, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory (1014 p.). England: The Belknap press of Harvard university press.
- Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, 95-120.
- Dolfsma, W. (2013). Government failure: society, markets and rules (2d ed.) (168 р.). UK: Edward Elgar publishing limited.
- Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity (480 p.). New York: free press.
- Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption: human nature and the reconstitution of social order (354 p.). New York: The free press.
- Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity (186 p.). Cambridge: Polity press.
- Hardin, R. (1993). The street – level epistemology of trust. Polities and society, 21(4), 505-529.
- Kolot, A. (2014). Розвиток наук про працю та соціально-трудові відносини на засадах міждисциплінарності [Rozvytok nauk pro pratsiu ta sotsialno-trudovi vidnosyny na zasadakh mizhdystsyplinarnosti]. Sotsialno-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriia ta praktyka, 1, 7-26.
- Kolot, A., & Herasymenko, O. (2017). Market, state and business in coordinates of the new economy. Problems and perspectives in management, 15(3), 76-97.
- Kolot, A., & Herasymenko, O. (2017). Social welfare state: genesis and prospects of development. Sotsialno-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriia ta praktyka, 1, 8-36.
- Kolot, A., Hrishnova, O., & Herasymenko, O. et al. (2010). Соціалізація відносин у сфері праці в контексті стійкого розвитку [Sotsializatsiia vidnosyn u sferi pratsi v konteksti stiikoho rozvytku] (348 p.). Kyiv: KNEU.
- Kolot, A., Hrishnova, O., & Herasymenko, O. et al. (2015). Соціальна відповідальність [Sotsialna vidpovidalnist] (519 p.). Kyiv: KNEU.
- Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power (228 p.). New York: John Wiley & Sons limited.
- Marshall, A. (1993). Принципы экономической науки [Printsipy ekonomicheskoy nauki]. V.1. Moskva: Progress.
- Mathews, J. (2012, April). Saving America (Thomas Jefferson Foundation medal lecture in citizen leadership). University of Virginia.
- Naím, M. (2013). The end of power: from boardrooms to battlefields and churches to states, why being in charge isn’t what it used to be (322 p.). New York: Basic books.
- New York Times (2012, June). Americans’ apporoval of the supreme count is down in a new poll.
- Schwab, K., & Davis, N. (2018). Shaping the fourth industrial revolution: a guide to building a better world (287 p.). London: Penguin books Ltd.
- Seligman, А. (2000). The problem of trust (240 p.). Princeton: Princeton university press.
- Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. Scotland.
- Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: a sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
- Sztompka, P. (2002). Socjologia. Analiza społeczeństwa (656 p.). Kraków: Znak.
- Sztompka, P. (2007). Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa (420 p.). Kraków: Znak.
- Данные исследований института Гэллапа по вопросам общественного доверия шестнадцати институтам между 1936 и 2012 г