Exploring Scandinavian approaches to defense budget transparency in Ukraine: A theoretical review of opportunities and challenges
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.14(1).2025.06
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2025, Issue #1, pp. 65-84
- 61 Views
-
12 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The paper examines the transparency of public finances, with a specific focus on the transparency of Ukraine’s defense budget. The relevance of this study arises from the ongoing war and the increasing public demand for accountability. The study aims to identify concrete measures to address existing gaps in defense budget transparency. The paper applies a comparative methodology, analyzing the feasibility of implementing Scandinavian transparency practices, particularly from Sweden and Norway, which are known for their advanced budgetary oversight mechanisms.
The study identifies key challenges, including bureaucratic inertia, limited technical capacity, political constraints, and national security concerns. To address these issues, the paper evaluates strategies such as developing digital budget platforms for real-time access to defense expenditures, participatory budgeting, and enhanced institutional accountability. The results indicate that Ukraine could benefit from secure digital platforms for real-time access to defense budget data, targeted legislative amendments to improve oversight, strengthened institutional capacity for in-depth budget reviews, and public consultations on non-sensitive areas of defense spending to foster public trust.
The findings suggest that gradual and context-sensitive improvements in defense budget transparency are both feasible and essential for optimizing resource allocation and strengthening public confidence. By providing a structured approach, this study contributes to the broader discourse on public finance transparency, offering practical recommendations tailored to Ukraine’s specific challenges.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H56, H61, H83
-
References90
-
Tables3
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Corruption Perceptions Index score (2012–2023)
- Figure 2. Government Defense Integrity Index in 2020
- Figure 3. Comparison of Corruption Perceptions Index and Open Budget Transparency scores
- Figure 4. Corruption Perception Indexes 2020–2023
- Figure 5. Budget Transparency Index of Ukraine (2010–2021)
- Figure 6. Key features of Scandinavian models
- Figure 7. Defense spending of Scandinavian states, 2000–2030 (forecast)
- Figure 8. Detailed examination of Scandinavian models
-
- Table 1. Key defense budgeting reforms for Ukraine to implement
- Table 2. Steps to enhance accountability and oversight in defense budgeting
- Table A1. Detailed characteristics of Scandinavian models for defense budget transparency
-
- Aftergood, S. (2010). National security secrecy: How the limits change. Social Research, 77(3), 839-852.
- Anderson, B., Curristine, T., & Merk, O. (2006). Budgeting in Norway. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 6(1).
- Arndt, C. (2008). The politics of governance ratings. International Public Management Journal, 11(3), 275-297.
- Baele, S. J., Balzacq, T., & Bourbeau, P. (2018). Numbers in global security governance. European Journal of International Security, 3(1), 22-44.
- Baillie, L., Dion, E., Leroux-Martin, P., Platz, I., Taylor, W. B., & Trenkov-Wermuth, C. (2024). The future of the security sector in Ukraine. United States Institute of Peace.
- Ball, C. (2009). What is transparency? Public Integrity, 11(4), 293-308.
- Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2017). Transparency to curb corruption? Concepts, measures and empirical merit. Crime, Law and Social Change, 68(4), 431-458.
- Bernstein, E. S. (2012). The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(2), 181-216.
- Boix, C., & Svolik, M. W. (2013). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions and power-sharing in dictatorships. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 300-316.
- Bovens, M. (2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946-967.
- Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(4), 452-476.
- Carlitz, R. (2013). Improving transparency and accountability in the budget process: An assessment of recent initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(s1), s49-s67.
- Chen, C., & Ganapati, S. (2023). Do transparency mechanisms reduce government corruption? A meta-analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1), 257-272.
- Constantinescu, M. (2024). Defense resources implications of the conflict in Ukraine on European Countries. International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 30(1), 214-220.
- Curtin, D. (2014). Challenging executive dominance in European Democracy. The Modern Law Review, 77(1), 1-32.
- Danish National Audit Office. (n.d.). Audit reports. Rigsrevisionen.
- Directorate for Administration and Financial Management (DFØ). (n.d.). The Norwegian Agency for Public and Financial Management.
- Downes, R., Moretti, D., & Shaw, T. (2017). Budgeting in Sweden. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 16(2), 9-74.
- Elliott, J. (2006). An introduction to sustainable development (3rd ed.). Routledge.
- Finnish Ministry of Finance. (2019). Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Finland Design Report 2019–2023. Open Government Partnership (OGP).
- Fiott, D. (2024). The challenges of defence spending in Europe. Intereconomics, 59(4), 189-192.
- Florini, A. (2007). The right to know: Transparency for an open world. Columbia University Press.
- Folketinget. (2018). Folketingets årsberetning 2017-18 [Annual Report of the Parliament]. (In Danish).
- Freeman, S. (2021). Achieving accountable state security forces in transitioning states: Building democratic state security forces in the former socialist space (Research Paper No. 2021-4). MIT Political Science Department.
- Friedman, L., & Hansen, V. (2012). Secrecy, transparency, and national security. William Mitchell Law Review, 38(5).
- Gil-Garcia, J. R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Pardo, T. A. (2020). Beyond transparency, participation, and collaboration? A reflection on the dimensions of open government. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 483-502.
- Government Offices of Sweden. (n.d.). Ekonomistyrningsverket [Swedish National Financial Management Authority].
- Greve, C., & Ejersbo, N. (2015). Moderniseringen af den offentlige sektor [the modernization of the public sector]. Akademisk Forlag. (In Danish).
- Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 50-73.
- Hansen, H. K., & Flyverbom, M. (2015). The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization, 22(6), 872-889.
- Hellberg, R. (2023). Swedish public procurement and the defence industry: Obstacles and opportunities. Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics, 7(2), 103-137.
- Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (2012). Good government: The relevance of political science. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Hyytinen, A., Tuimala, J., & Hammar, M. (2022). Enhancing the adoption of digital public services: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), Article 101687.
- Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
- International Budget Partnership. (2023). Open Budget Survey. Rankings.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2018). Fiscal transparency handbook.
- Klaus, L. (2016). Transforming armed forces through military transparency: Open government challenges in a world of secrecy. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(1), 99-119.
- Klitgaard, R. (2019). Engaging corruption: New ideas for the International Monetary Fund. Policy Design and Practice, 2(3), 229-242.
- Lindblad, F. (2019). Barriers in the public procurement process: Restricting long-term sustainable construction of wooden buildings. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 23(2), 13-32.
- Lyutiy, I., Petlenko, Y., & Drozd, N. (2022). The importance of openness and transparency in the budget process in the defense and security sector of Ukraine. Financial & Credit Activity: Problems of Theory & Practice, 6(47), 99-110.
- Marklund, C. (2015). From promise to compromise: Nordic openness in a world of global transparency. In N. Gotz & C. Marklund (Eds.), The Paradox of Openness: Transparency and Participation in Nordic Cultures of Consensus (pp. 237-261). Brill.
- Marton, P. (2020). Foreign and security policy institutions in Central and Eastern Europe. Dialóg Campus.
- Meijer, A. (2009). Understanding modern transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255-269.
- Mendel, T. (2008). Freedom of information: A comparative legal survey (2nd ed.). UNESCO Publishing.
- Ministry of Finance Finland. (2019). Government’s 2019 budget proposal for Ministry of Finance administrative sector.
- Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2013). The good, the bad and the ugly: Controlling corruption in the European Union (Working Paper No. 35). European Research Center for Anti-corruption and State-building.
- Nate, S., Stavytskyy, A., & Kharlamova, G. (2023). Index of the openness and transparency of budgeting and financial management of the defence and security sector: Case of Ukraine. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 5617.
- National Audit Office of Finland. (2018). National Audit Office’s Annual Report to Parliament 2018.
- National Audit Office of Finland. (2024). National Audit Office’s Annual Report to Parliament 2024.
- NATO. (1999). Policy on the public disclosure of NATO information.
- NATO. (2008). NATO information management policy.
- NATO. (2011). NATO records policy.
- Norwegian Parliament. (2018) Norwegian Parliament approves 2018 Fiscal Budget; Implementation of SAF-T in 2020.
- Norwegian Press Association. (n.d.). Pressens Faglige Utvalg [Norwegian Press Complaints Commission]. (In Norwegian).
- O’Brien, M., Stapenhurst, R., & Prater, B. (2012). World Bank Institute’s approach to parliamentary capacity strengthening. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(3), 593-607.
- OECD. (2007). OECD economic surveys: Ukraine 2007. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2016). Open government: The global context and the way forward. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2017). OECD budget transparency toolkit: Practical steps for supporting openness, integrity and accountability in public financial management. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2019a). Budgeting and public expenditures in OECD countries 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2019b). Digital government review of Sweden: Towards a data-driven public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2019c). Government at a glance 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Open Government Partnership (OGP). (2024, June 10). Fiscal openness in Nordic+ fact sheet (June 2024).
- Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G. (2004). How do electoral rules shape party structures, government coalitions, and economic policies? (Working Paper No. 1115). CESIFO.
- Peters, B. G., Dahlström, C., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2011). Steering from the centre: Strengthening political control in Western democracies. University of Toronto Press.
- Petlenko, Y., Tarnu, L., Shchehliuk, B., & Nate, S. (2023). Enhancing the effectiveness of defence planning through the implementation of capability-based budgeting and civilian control. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 6(4).
- Posen, B. R. (2014). The sources of military doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the world wars. Cornell University Press.
- Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165-190.
- Scarazzato, L., & Lipson, M. (2023). Going private (equity): A new challenge to transparency in the arms industry (Context Policy Paper No. 23-02). Security in Context.
- Singapore Ministry of Defence. (2020). Singapore Government statement in response to Transparency International’s Government Defence Integrity Index 2020. Singapore Government.
- SIPRI. (2023). Military expenditure by region in constant US dollars.
- Søreide, T., & Williams, A. (Eds.). (2011). Corruption, grabbing and development: Real world challenges. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Stiglitz, J. (2002). Transparency in government. In S. Djankov, R. Islam, & C. McLeish (Eds.), The right to tell: The role of mass media in economic development (pp. 27-44). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
- Sturges, P. (2004). Corruption, transparency, and a role for ICT? International Journal of Information Ethics, 2.
- Teorell, J., Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (2008). The quality of government dataset, version 15May08. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.
- Thompson, D. F. (1999). Democratic secrecy. Political Science Quarterly, 114(2), 181-193.
- Toropin, V. (2022). Fighting corruption on a learning curve: The evolution of Ukrainian civil society since 2004 (Doctoral Thesis). The University of Texas in Austin.
- Transparency International Denmark. (2019). Our work in Denmark.
- Transparency International Finland. (n.d.). Our work in Finland.
- Transparency International. (2020). The Government Defence Integrity Index 2020.
- Transparency International. (2023a). Corruption perceptions index.
- Transparency International. (2023b). Corruption perceptions index. Ukraine.
- Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research. Annual Review of Political Science, 10.
- U.S. Department of State. (n.d.). Bureau of International Information Programs.
- Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 22). OECD Publishing.
- Vakulenko, V. (2020). Public sector reforms in Ukraine: The roles played by global and local agents in the implementation of convergent and divergent changes (Ph.D. Thesis). Nord University Business School.
- Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2011). Law on Access to Public Information.
- Wehmeier, S., & Raaz, O. (2012). Transparency matters: The concept of organizational transparency in the academic discourse. Public Relations Inquiry, 1(3), 337-366.
- World Bank Group. (n.d.). Corruption Perceptions Index score.
- Yahelska, K., Tropina, V., Khomutenko, A., Petlenko, Y., Lantukh, K., & Kryhan, Y. (2021). Comparative analysis of methods for forecasting budget indicators. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 39(3), Article 4521.
- Zatonatska, T., Kharlamova, G., Pakholchuk, V., & Syzov, A. (2024). Natural language processing methods application in defense budget analysis. Studies in Business and Economics, 19(2), 290-307.