The relationship between organizational characteristics and the quality of local government financial statements
-
Author(s)Siti Zabedah SaidinLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7021-6323
,
Engku Ismail Engku AliLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5954-4450
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(2).2023.10
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2023, Issue #2, pp. 117-128
- Cited by
- 234 Views
-
73 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study investigates the relationship between organizational characteristics and the quality of financial statements in Malaysian local government. Organizational characteristics, including status, size, financial stability, tax revenue collection efficiency, and level of competence, were examined to discern their impact on mandatory information disclosure in local government financial statements. Data were collected from 71 local governments in Peninsular Malaysia, representing nearly 74% of the total population, using a combination of secondary data from audited financial reports and official documents, as well as structured questionnaires. The results indicate that tax revenue collection efficiency and the level of competence had a significant positive relationship with financial statement quality. Conversely, organizational characteristics related to status, size, and financial stability did not significantly impact financial statement quality. This implies the greater significance of human resources, precisely tax revenue collection efficiency and account officers’ competence, in shaping local government financial statement quality in Malaysia. These findings support the stewardship theory, confirming the connection between specific organizational characteristics and financial statement quality. However, limitations include relying solely on secondary data and facing certain data collection constraints. Future research can enhance these findings by exploring additional factors through in-depth qualitative or case studies.
view full abstract
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H11, H83, M41
-
References61
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variables and measurement
- Table 2. Pearson correlation analysis between independent and dependent variables
- Table 3. Multivariate regression analysis
-
- Afiah, N. N., & Rahmatika, D. N. (2014). Factors influencing the quality of financial reporting and its implications on good government governance. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 5(1), 111-121.
- Ahmed, K. (1996). Disclosure policy choice and corporate characteristics: A study of Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting, 3(1), 183-203.
- Ahmed, K., & Nicholls, D. (1994). The impact of non-financial company characteristics on mandatory disclosure compliance in developing countries: The case of Bangladesh. The International Journal of Accounting, 29(1), 62-77.
- Akhtaruddin, M. (2005). Corporate mandatory disclosure practices in Bangladesh. International Journal of Accounting, 40(4), 399-422.
- Alesani, D., Ligouri, M., & Steccolini, I. (2007). Between managerial reforms and search for legitimacy: Strengthening United Nations accountability. In M. W. Bauer & C. Knill (Eds.), Management Reforms in International Organizations (pp. 97-117). Baden-Baden: NOMOS.
- Armstrong, J. (1997). Stewardship and public service (Discussion Paper). The Public Service Commission of Canada.
- Azmi, S. (2002). Study on the development of government bond market in selected developing member countries: The case of Malaysia. ADB Conference on Local Government Finance and Bond Market Financing ADB Headquarters. Manila, the Philippines.
- Barton, A. (1999). Public and private sector accounting – the non-identical twins. Australian Accounting Review, 9(18), 22-31.
- Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2007). Corporate governance: What can we learn from public governance? The Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 92-104.
- Christiaens, J. (1999). Financial accounting reform in Flemish municipalities: An empirical investigation. Financial Accountability & Management, 15(1), 21-40.
- Cooke, T. E. (1989). Disclosure in the corporate annual reports of Swedish companies. Accounting and Business Research, 19(74), 113-124.
- Coy, D. V. (1995). A public accountability index for annual reporting by New Zealand Universities (Ph.D. Thesis). University of Waikato, New Zealand.
- Coy, D., & Dixon, K. (2004). The public accountability index: crafting a parametric disclosure index for annual reports. The British Accounting Review, 36(1), 79-106.
- Coy, D., Tower, G., & Dixon, K. (1993). Quantifying the quality of tertiary education annual reports. Accounting and Finance, 33(2), 121-129.
- Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
- Dixon, K., Coy, D., & Tower G. (1991). External reporting by New Zealand universities, 1985–1989: Improving accountability. Financial Accountability & Management, 7(3), 159-178.
- Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49-64.
- Engku Ali, E. I. (2006). The quality of information disclosure of financial statements of local authorities in peninsular Malaysia. Local Authority Accountants Conference. City Bayview, Langkawi, Malaysia.
- Engku Ali, E. I., Ismail, M. S., Syed Ismail, S. S., Saidin, S. Z., & Abdullah, Z. (2006). Perakaunan sektor awam di Malaysia [Public Sector Accounting in Malaysia]. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press. (In Malaysian).
- Entwistle, G. M. (1999). Exploring the R&D disclosure environment. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 323-342.
- Evans, J. H., & Patton, J. M. (1983). An economic analysis of participation in the municipal finance officers association certificate of conformance program. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(2), 151-175.
- Evans, J. H., & Patton, J. M. (1987). Signaling and monitoring in public sector accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 25, 130-158.
- Firmansyah, A., Arfiansyah, Z., & Yuniar, M. R. (2022). Local governments financial reporting quality in Papua and West Papua: Do local government characteristics matter? Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 14(2), 139-147.
- Frey, B. S., & Benz, M. (2005). Can private learn from public governance? The Economic Journal, 115(507), F377-F396.
- Giroux, G., & McLelland, A. J. (2003). Governance structures and accounting at large municipalities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(3), 203-230.
- Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 44-77.
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Hooks, J., Coy, D., & Davey, H. (2000). Construction of a disclosure index to measure accountability (Working Paper). Massey University, New Zealand.
- Ingram, R. (1984). Economic incentives and the choice of state government accounting practices. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1), 126-134.
- Iskandar, D., & Setiyawati, H. (2015). The effect of internal accountants’ competence on the quality of financial reporting and the impact on the financial accountability. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 3(5), 55-64.
- Jafri, S. S. A. (2001). District lanning as a micro-regional development planning: A concept of rural-urban interface. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 47(1), 11-15.
- Jones, R., & Pendlebury, M. (2004). A theory of published accounts of local authorities. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 305-325.
- Kasim, E. Y. (2015). Effect of government accountants competency and implementation of internal control to the quality of government financial reporting. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 8(1), 97-105.
- Keerasuntonpong, P., Dunstan, K., & Khanna, B. (2015). Factors influencing disclosures of statements of service performance of New Zealand local authorities. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(3), 304-328.
- Khasharmeh, H. A., & Aljifri, K. (2010). The timeliness of annual reports in Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates: An empirical comparative study. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 4(1), 51-71.
- Klein, S. B., Pieper, T. M., & Jaskiewicz, P. (2005). Antecedents for agency and stewardship orientation in corporate governance – the role of culture. Family Enterprise Research Conference (FERC). Oregon.
- Laswad, F., Fisher, R., & Oyelere, P. (2001). Public Sector Financial Disclosure on the Internet: A Study of New Zealand Local Authorities (Discussion Paper No.92) Lincoln University, New Zealand.
- Laswad, F., Fisher, R., & Oyelere, P. (2005). Determinants of voluntary Internet financial reporting by local government authorities. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(2), 101-121.
- Mack, J., & Ryan, C. (2004). An empirical investigation of users of the general purpose financial reports of Australian Government Departments (Working Paper Series 2004–009). Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
- Mack, J., Ryan, C., & Dunstan, K. (2001). Local government annual reports: Australian empirical evidence on recipients. Queensland University of Technology.
- Malaysia: Federal Constitution. (1957). Kuala Lumpur: National Legislative Bodies/National Authorities.
- Malaysian Legislation. (1957). Financial Procedure Act 1957. Kuala Lumpur: National Printing.
- Malaysian Legislation. (1976). Local government Act 1976 (Act 171). Kuala Lumpur: International Law Book services.
- MAMPU. (2001). A study identifying the causes of delays in the preparation and delivery of annual financial statements of local authorities (Annual Report 2021). Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit (MAMPU).
- McDaniel, L., Martin, R. D., & Maines, L. A. (2002). Evaluating financial reporting quality: The effects of financial expertise vs. financial literacy. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 139-167.
- Nailah, S. (2001). Management and auditing of local authority: Towards better accountability and transparency. IFSALGAR Conference. Langkawi, Kedah.
- Patton, J., & Zelenka, I. (1997). An empirical analysis of the determinants of the extent of disclosure in annual reports of joint stock companies in the Czech Republic. European Accounting Review, 6(4), 605-626.
- Phang, S. N. (1989). Sistem kerajaan tempatan di Malaysia [Local Government System in Malaysia]. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (In Malaysian).
- Rahman, A. A. (1998). Disclosure of corporate financial information in Malaysia (Ph.D. Thesis). University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
- Robbins, W. A., & Austin, K. R. (1986). Disclosure quality in governmental financial reports: An assessment of the appropriateness of a compound measure. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(2), 412-421.
- Ryan, C., Stanley, T., & Nelson, M. (2002). Accountability disclosure by Queensland local government council: 1997–1999. Financial Accountability & Management Journal, 18(3), 261-289.
- Singhvi, S. S., & Desai, H. B. (1971). An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate financial disclosure. The Accounting Review, 46(1), 129-138.
- Slyke, D. M. V. (2005). Agents or stewards: How government manages its contracting relationships with nonprofit social service providers. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2005(1).
- Syed Soffian, S. I., Ayoib, C. A., Abidin, S., & Engku Ali, E. I. (2002). The determinants of financial reporting lag: The case of local governments in the state of Kedah, Malaysia (Working paper series No. 9/2002). Universiti Utara Malaysia.
- Tayib, M. (1998). The determinants of assessment tax collection: The Malaysian local authority experience (Ph.D. Thesis). University of Glamorgan, Wales.
- Tayib, M., & Coombs, H. M. (1997). Developing a disclosure index for local authority published accounts: A comparative study of local authority published financial reports between the UK and Malaysia. Proceeding of the 6th CIGAR Conference: Comparative International Governmental Accounting Research Local Government Accounting. Milan, Italy.
- Taylor, D., & Rosair, M. (2000). The effects of participating parties, the public and size on government departments’ accountability disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Accountability and Performance, 6(1), 77-97.
- Tilling, M. V. (2004). Company characteristics and occupational health and safety disclosures: A quantitative review of Australian annual reports. Fourth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference. Singapore.
- Treasury of Malaysia. (1986). Pekeliling Perbendaharaan Bil. 8 Tahun 1986: Penjenisan kod bagi hasil dan perbelanjaan [Treasury Circular Number 8, year 1986: Classification of codes for revenue and expenditure]. Kuala Lumpur: Perbendaharaan Malaysia. (In Malaysian).
- Treasury of Malaysia. (1994). Pekeliling Perbendaharaan Bil. 15 Tahun 1994: Garis Panduan Untuk Penyediaan dan Pembentangan Laporan Tahunan dan Penyata Kewangan Badan-badan Berkanun Persekutuan [Treasury Circular Number 15, year 1994: Guidelines for the preparation and presentation of annual reports and financial statements of statutory bodies]. Kuala Lumpur: Perbendaharaan Malaysia. (In Malaysian).
- UN-Habitat. (2015). Global Activities Report 2015: Increasing Synergy for Greater National Ownership. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, UNON Publishing Services Section, Nairobi, Kenya.
