Effect of multidimensional performance appraisal on the structure of local government expenditure
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(1).2023.08
-
Article InfoVolume 12 2023, Issue #1, pp. 86-99
- 235 Views
-
58 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In many countries, including China, traditional one-dimensional performance appraisal has led local governments to spend more on economic construction and less on human capital and public services. In 2013, China decided to abandon the traditional bias of performance appraisal. This study aims to analyze the effect of multidimensional performance appraisal on the local government expenditure structure in China. The study collected panel data from 31 provincial administrative regions in China during 2007–2018 for empirical analysis. By assigning different weights to economic-based performance appraisal pressure, livelihood-based performance appraisal pressure, and ecological-based performance appraisal pressure, the study observed the effects of performance appraisal criteria on local government expenditure structure. The results show that: local governments place more emphasis on tasks with higher relative incentive intensity and allocate more expenditures to them; the correlation between tasks affects the proportion of expenditures on related tasks; the basic principle of local government officials in balancing the expenditure structure is to maximize their own utility. They give priority to spending on tasks with high marginal revenue. In addition, this paper also discusses the causes and mechanisms of distortion in local government spending structure. Finally, the paper puts forward corresponding policy recommendations, which provide new ideas for multidimensional performance assessment of local governments.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)R51, Н11, Н79
-
References20
-
Tables8
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical framework
-
- Table 1. Regression results of economic-livelihood performance appraisal pressure
- Table 2. Regression results of economic-ecological performance assessment pressure
- Table 3. Regression results of people’s livelihood-ecological performance assessment pressure
- Table 4. Regression results of economic-livelihood-ecological performance assessment pressure
- Table 5. Regression results of economic-livelihood performance appraisal pressure
- Table 6. Regression results of economic-ecological performance assessment pressure
- Table 7. Regression results of livelihood-ecological performance assessment pressure
- Table 8. Regression results of economic-livelihood-ecological performance assessment pressure
-
- Ahuja, D., & Pandit, D. (2020). Public expenditure and economic growth: Evidence from the developing countries. FIIB Business Review, 9(3), 228-236.
- Basílio, M., Pires, C., Borralho, C., & dos Reis, J. P. (2020). Local government efficiency: is there anything new after Troika’s intervention in Portugal? Eurasian Economic Review, 10, 309-332.
- Bayramov, S. (2020). Structural efficiency of budget expenditures as a stability factor of the budget system. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 4, 262-268.
- Deslatte, A., & Swann, W. L. (2020). Elucidating the linkages between entrepreneurial orientation and local government sustainability performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(1), 92-109.
- Fu, Y. (2008). Why decentralization is different in China: An analytical framework that considers political and fiscal incentives. World Economy, 11, 16-25.
- Halaskova, R., Halaskova, M., Gavurova, B., & Kocisova, K. (2022). The local governments efficiency in the EU countries: Evaluation by using the data envelopment analysis. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 18(1), 127-137.
- Liu, R., & Jin, T. (2015). Political Performance Assessment, Communication Effects, and Economic Development – Also on Short-term Local Government Behavior. Contemporary Economic Science, 37(3), 9-18.
- Luna-Arocas, R., & Lara, F. J. (2020). Talent management, affective organizational commitment and service performance in local government. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4827.
- Moura, L. F., Pinheiro de Lima, E., Deschamps, F., Van Aken, E., Gouvea da Costa, S. E., Treinta, F. T., & Cestari, J. M. A. P. (2019). Designing performance measurement systems in nonprofit and public administration organizations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(8), 1373-1410.
- Onyango-Delewa, P. (2020). Fiscal illusion as an incentive for local government public expenditure efficiency: The influence of community sensitization. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah, 7(4), 341-358.
- Pi, J. (2012). A Study on the Governance of Local Officials under the Chinese Style of Decentralization. Economic Research, 47(10), 14-26.
- Qian, X., Cao, T., & Li, W. (2011). Promotion pressure, officials’ tenure and lending behavior of the city commercial banks. Economic Research Journal(China), 46(12), 72-85.
- Sang, S. (2009). The Research Group on Local Government Performance Evaluation System in China. China Government Performance Assessment Report. China: Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China Press.
- Syam, A. Y., Chandrarin, G., & Harsono. (2019). Effects of Fiscal Health on Human Development Index in Indonesia: Regional Government Performance Mediating Role. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 4(10), 50-59.
- Ugyel, L. (2021). Relationship between public sector reforms and culture: The implementation of NPM-related performance management reforms in a collectivist and risk averse culture. Public Administration and Development, 41(5), 257-266.
- Xie, S., & Wang, T. (2018). An Empirical Study on the Impact of Social Stability Assessment on the Structure of Local Public Expenditure. Journal of Central South University of Economics and Law, 1, 104-114.
- Zhang, W., & Jiao, Y. (2010). Research on Local Government Performance Evaluation – A Multitasking Principal Agent Perspective. Dongyue Luncong, 31(05), 153-158.
- Zhang, W. (2021). The Game of Setting Performance Goals of Grassroots Governments and the Dissimilation of Pressurized Systems: Based on Field Investigation in Seven Cities in the North. Journal of Public Management, 18(3), 64-75.
- Zhou, F. (2009). Championship System. Sociological Research, 3, 54-77.
- Zhou, L. (2007). Research on the Promotion Championship Model of Local Officials in China. Economic Research, 7, 36-50.