Do South African state-owned entities follow the pecking order theory of capital structure?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.10(1).2021.03
-
Article InfoVolume 10 2021, Issue #1, pp. 25-33
- Cited by
- 664 Views
-
122 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In corporate finance, the pecking-order theory suggests that companies adhere to a particular financing hierarchy, with internal funding taking preference over external funding, and debt financing taking preference over equity. This paper examines whether South African state-owned entities prioritize their financing sources as predicted by the pecking-order theory. A financing deficit variable comprising various cash flow-based components was used to test the theory. A panel regression model was employed using panel data estimators. Using a cross-section sample of 33 state-owned entities from 1995 to 2018, the study finds no evidence that South African state-owned entities follow a pecking order to finance investment projects. The pecking order theory proposition that costs of adverse selection are dominant for lower levels of leverage provides a reason for the financing deficit coefficient not being close to unity and hence an indication that the SOEs in South Africa do not follow the pecking order behavior in their financing decisions, an indication that South African capital market is still developing.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G31, G32
-
References24
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variables and measures: Pecking order model
- Table 2. Differences between FE, RE and OLS estimators
- Table 3. Regression results: Pecking order model
- Table 4. Hausman test results
- Table 5. Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects
-
- Ağca, Ş., Mozumdar, A., & Frank, E. F. M. (2010). Corporate Financing Choices Constrained by the Amount of Debt Companies Can Support.
- Chirinko, R. S., & Singha, A. R. (2000). Testing static trade-off against pecking order models of capital structure: a critical comment. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(3), 417-425.
- Cross, R. (2010). Capital structure and financing choices: an Australian study (Master’s Thesis). Massey University.
- De Jong, A., Verbeek, M., & Verwijmeren, P. (2010). The impact of financing surpluses and large financing deficits on tests of the pecking order theory. Financial Management, 39(2), 733-756.
- De Jong, A., Verbeek, M., & Verwijmeren, P. (2011). Companies’ debt-equity decisions when the static trade-off theory and the pecking order theory disagree. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(5), 1303-1314.
- De Vries, A. (2010). The effect of firm characteristics and economic factors on capital structures: of South African listed industrial firms (Master’s Thesis).
- De Wet, J. V. (2006). Determining the optimal capital structure: a practical contemporary approach. Meditari Accountancy Research, 14(2), 1-16.
- Elomo, P. N. (2014). Determinants of capital structure of start-up firms in South Africa (Master’s Thesis). University of the Witwatersrand.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 1-33.
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). Financing decisions: who issues stock? Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 549-582.
- Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 217-248.
- Kayhan, A., & Titman, S. (2007). Firms’ histories and their capital structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(1), 1-32.
- Lemmon, M. L., & Zender, J. F. (2010). Debt Capacity and Tests of Capital Structure Theories. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(5), 1161-1187.
- Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., & Zender, J. F. (2008). Back to the beginning: persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1575-1608.
- Lew, S. H. (2013). An investigation of the most appropriate capital structure theory and leverage level determinants (Ph.D. Thesis).
- Marimuthu, F. (2020). Government assistance to state-owned enterprises: a hindrance to financial performance. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 17(2), 40-50.
- Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574-592.
- Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. C. (1999). Testing static trade-off against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 219-244.
- Verwijmeren, P. (2008). Empirical Essays on Debt, Equity, and Convertible Securities (Doctoral Thesis). Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
- Vicol, M. (2010). Capital structure: testing pecking order theory and static trade-off theory in the current crisis (Master’s Thesis).
- Wiagustini, N. L. P., Ramantha, I. W., Sedana, I. B. P., & Rahyuda, H. (2017). Indonesia’s Capital Structure: Pecking Order Theory or Trade-Off Theory. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(16), 119-132.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.
- Yulianto, A., Suseno, D. A., & Widiyanto, W. (2016). Testing Pecking Order Theory and Trade off Theory Models in Public Companies in Indonesia. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 21-28.
- Zyl, G. V. (2019). Eskom CEO wants government take on some of its massive debt. BizNews.