State funding of higher education as a factor of ensuring its quality: experience of the European countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.09(1).2020.06
-
Article InfoVolume 9 2020, Issue #1, pp. 60-69
- Cited by
- 632 Views
-
116 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The article presents a comparative analysis of state funding of higher education as a factor of its effectiveness in European countries. The analysis is conducted on the example of countries where the share of state budget expenditures on education no less than 11%.
The assumption that education is the main factor in the formation of a responsible citizens capable to provide the job themselves, and to provide qualified professionals for the country, that means to promote economic and cultural growth, is taken as a basis of the article.
The structure of state expenditures on education in general and the amount of higher education funding in countries under consideration is analyzed.
The correlation between the amount of expenditures on higher education and the indicators of the quality index of the higher education system QS World University Rankings is analyzed. Also the correlation analysis between other indexes, that characterize the general level of human development and quality of business as a result of public investment in training of highly qualified specialists, is done.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H52, I22
-
References29
-
Tables5
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Education index and expenditures on education in some European countries and Ukraine in 2018
- Figure 2. Analysis of the correlation between the amount of expenditure per student and the QS World University Rankings–2018
- Figure 3. Human Development Index and Doing Business in European countries in 2018
-
- Table 1. The structure of public spending on education in some European countries and Ukraine in 2018
- Table 2. Gross enrolment ratio, tertiary (% of tertiary school-age population) in European countries and Ukraine in 2018
- Table 3. QS Higher Education System Strength Rankings – 2018
- Table 4. Components of QS World University Rankings–2018
- Table 5. Analysis of the correlation between expenditure per student and the components of the QS World University Rankings
-
- Abenov, Ye., Kirdasinova, K., Myrzageldi, K., Uskelenova, A., Nurgaliyeva, A., & Ismailova, D. (2019). Innovative Development of Entrepreneurship in Kazakhstan within the Framework of the Public-Private Partnership (PPP). Revista Espacios, 40(20).
- Adambekova, А., & Amankeldy, N. (2016). Education system funding in Kazakhstan: dynamics of education spending: national and international experience. Nauchnyi rezultat. Seriya. Ekonomycheskye yssledovanyia - Scientific result. Economic research, 1(17), 32-37. (In Russian).
- Antoniuk, L., Ilnytskyi, D., Barabas, D., & Sandul, M. (2017). International competitive disposition of national higher education systems. Mizhnarodna Ekonomichna Polityka – International Economic Policy, 2, 7-39. (In Ukrainian).
- Antoniuk, L., Kalenyuk, L, Tsyrkun, O., & Sandul, M. (2019). Rankings in the higher education competitiveness management system. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 325-339.
- Chernukha, T. (2019). Peculiarities of the institutional blocks of the Ukrainian higher education system in the conditions of economic transformation. Development Management, 17(3), 54-67.
- Dekhtiar N., & Yanchenko V. (2018) Financing of the higher education system in Ukraine. Infrastruktura rynku - Market infrastructure, 25, 667-672. (In Ukrainian).
- Del Boca, D., Monfardini, Ch., & See, S. G. (2019). Government Education Expenditures, Pre-Primary Education and School Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis (IZA Discussion Paper No. 11375).
- Deloitte Access Economics. (2019). Transparency in Higher Education Expenditure: Australian Government Department of Education.
- Eurostat. (2020). Government expenditure on education.
- Gejger, R., & Kheller, K. (2012). Trends in Higher Education Funding: USA. Voprosy` obrazovaniya - Education issues, 3, 5-29. (In Russian).
- Goksu, A., & Goksu, G. G. (2015). A Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Financing in Different Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 1152-1158.
- Govindarajan, V., & Srivastava A. (June 2, 2020). A Post-Pandemic Strategy for U.S. Higher Ed. Harvard Business Review.
- Hrishyn, A. (2011). Priority of the quality of services of Latvian universities: problems and proposals. Aktualnye problemy obrazovaniya: mezhvuzov. Naucho-prakticheskaya i uchebno-metodicheskaya konferentsiya - Actual problems of education: interuniversity scientific-practical and educational-methodical conference. Institute of Transport and Communication, Riga. (In Russian).
- Khovrak, I. (2020). Higher education institutions as a driver of sustainable social development: Polish experience for Ukraine. Environmental Economics, 11(1), 1-13.
- Miningou, E. W. (2019). Quality Education and the Efficiency of Public Expenditure: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis (Policy Research Working Paper No. 9077). World Bank, Washington, DC.
- Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2020). State expenditures on education. (In Russian).
- Mitchell, M., Leachman, M., & Saenz, M. (2019). State Higher Education Funding Cuts Have Pushed Costs to Students, Worsened Inequality. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
- Moss, D. A., & Lo, S. (2010). Financing Higher Education in Australia. Harvard Business School Finance case.
- OECD. (2019). Benchmarking Higher Education System Performance, Higher Education. OECD Publishing, Paris.
- QS Top Universities. (2018). QS Higher Education System Strength Rankings.
- Sovsun, І. (2016). The new model of higher education funding must be transparent and efficient in the use of budget funds. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (In Ukrainian).
- Stadnyi, Ye. (2016). Conceptual model of state funding of universities based on performance results. CEDOS. (In Ukrainian).
- State Treasury Service of Ukraine. (2020). Expenditures on the program classification of expenditures and lending of the state budget.
- Stavytskyy, A., Dluhopolskyi, O., Kharlamova, G., Karpukand, F., & Osetskyi, V. (2019). Testing the fruitfulness of the institutional environment for the development of innovative-entrepreneurial universities in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(4), 274-288.
- Stryhul, M., Khomeriki, O., Yahodzinskyi, S., Lyasota, L., & Semenets-Orlova, I. (2019). Peculiarities of development and dynamics of economism and the commercialization of Ukrainian higher education. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(2), 289-302.
- The Pew Charitable Trusts. (2019). Two Decades of Change in Federal and State Higher Education Funding.
- United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2018). Human Development Indices and Indicators: 2018 Statistical Update.
- Usyk, V. (2019). Particularities of higher education funding: analysis of Ukrainian and world contexts. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriia: Ekonomika - Bulletin of Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko. Series: Economics, 2(203), 59-67. (In Ukrainian).
- World Bank Group. (2018). Doing Business 2018. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.