Translating environmental leadership into sustainable success in Vietnamese women-owned SMEs: A mixed-method approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(2).2026.13
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #2, pp. 176-188
- 16 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
As the global economy increasingly emphasizes sustainable development, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in emerging economies face growing pressure to integrate environmental responsibility with long-term business performance. This study aims to examine how environmental leadership and corporate social responsibility contribute to sustainable success in women-owned SMEs through the roles of green innovation and green competitive advantage. The paper analyzes survey data collected from 536 female business leaders in Vietnam using partial least squares structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. The results reveal that environmental leadership and corporate social responsibility do not exert a direct influence on sustainable success (p > 0.05). Instead, their effects operate through a full serial mediation mechanism in which corporate social responsibility stimulates green innovation, which subsequently strengthens green competitive advantage and ultimately enhances sustainable success. The structural model explains 52.1% of the variance in sustainable success. In addition, market orientation significantly strengthens the relationship between green competitive advantage and sustainable success (β = 0.176, p < 0.001). Configurational analysis further identifies two alternative strategic pathways leading to high sustainable success, both highlighting the central role of green innovation and green competitive advantage. These findings demonstrate that ethical leadership values must be transformed into concrete green capabilities to generate sustainable competitive performance in resource-constrained environments.
Acknowledgment
This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 504.05-2023.05.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q56, M14, L26, O32
-
References29
-
Tables8
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
-
- Table 1. Profile of respondents and organizations (n = 536)
- Table 2. Reliability and convergent validity results
- Table 3. Explanatory power (R2) and predictive relevance (Q2)
- Table 4. Direct hypothesis testing results and effect sizes
- Table 5. Indirect and interaction effects
- Table 6. Configurations for achieving high sustainable success
- Table А1. Measurement scales
- Table В1. Analysis of necessary conditions for sustainable success (SS)
-
- Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
- Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Bocquet, R., Bas, C. Le, Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2015). CSR, innovation, and firm performance in sluggish growth contexts: A firm-level empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 146, 241-254.
- Chang, C. (2011). The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: The mediation role of green innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361-370.
- Chen, Y. S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image – Green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531-543.
- Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Academic Press.
- Egri, C. P., & Herman, S. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 571-604.
- Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101-107.
- Golicic, S. L., & Smith, C. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 78-95.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons:The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
- Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
- Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hussein, H., Albadry, O. M., Mathew, V., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Alsetoohy, O., Abou Kamar, M., & Khairy, H. A. (2024). Digital leadership and sustainable competitive advantage: Leveraging green absorptive capability and eco-innovation in tourism and hospitality businesses. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(13).
- Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32-61.
- Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
- Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 160, Article 120262.
- Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D., & Tan, K. C. (2013). Green supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(8), 1088-1109.
- Min, J., Iqbal, S., Khan, M. A. S., Akhtar, S., Anwar, F., & Qalati, S. A. (2020). Impact of supervisory behavior on sustainable employee performance: Mediation of conflict management strategies using PLS-SEM. PLoS ONE, 15.
- Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35.
- Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
- Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders’ influence on employees’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176-194.
- Singh, S. K., Giudice, M. Del, Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, Article 119762.
- Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111-147.
- Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 411-427.
- Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-h. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106-117.


