The impact of social responsibility on the competitive advantage of small and medium-sized enterprises in Hanoi, Vietnam
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.24
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #1, pp. 325-338
- 58 Views
-
5 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Small and medium-sized enterprises account for more than 98.2% of total enterprises in Hanoi and contribute significantly to the city’s employment, innovation, and GDP. This study aims to analyze and evaluate the influence of corporate social responsibility and green marketing on the competitive advantage of small and medium-sized enterprises in Hanoi, Vietnam. With 292 valid survey responses, data analysis was conducted through PLS-SEM. The study results show that corporate social responsibility and green marketing are critical to the competitiveness of small and medium-sized firms in Hanoi. Corporate social responsibility positively influences green marketing (β = 0.812, p < 0.01) and corporate reputation (β = 0.458, p < 0.01). Similarly, green marketing strongly impacts corporate reputation (β = 0.440, p < 0.01), while corporate reputation contributes substantially to competitive advantage (β = 0.794, p < 0.01). Indirect effects were also observed. Accordingly, corporate social responsibility and green marketing enhance competitive advantage through corporate reputation, with indirect path coefficients of 0.364 and 0.350, respectively. Additionally, corporate social responsibility indirectly affects corporate reputation via green marketing (β = 0.358, p < 0.01). The findings show that integrating corporate social responsibility and green marketing strategies improves enterprises’ reputation, which in turn improves competitive advantages.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, M31, Q01
-
References55
-
Tables6
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Proposed research model
- Figure 2. Description of the survey samples
- Figure 3. The confirmed research model
-
- Table 1. Construct reliability and validity
- Table 2. Discriminant validity
- Table 3. Bootstrapping analysis results of direct effects
- Table 4. Bootstrapping analysis results of indirect effects
- Table 5. R-square coefficients
- Table 6. PLS-MGA and bootstrapping results
-
- Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
- Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Brønn, S. P., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2008). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 91-109.
- Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1257-1278.
- Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
- Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cronin, J. J., Smith, J. S., Gleim, M. R., Ramirez, E., & Martinez, J. D. (2011). Green marketing strategies: An examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 158-174.
- Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.
- Dangelico, R. M., & Vocalelli, D. (2017). “Green marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1263-1279.
- Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329-360.
- Fernando, Y., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Wah, W.-X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 8-20.
- Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). A Friedman doctrine – The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times.
- Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499-510.
- Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327.
- Gürlek, M., Düzgün, E., & Meydan Uygur, S. (2017). How does corporate social responsibility create customer loyalty? The role of corporate image. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(3), 409-427.
- Ha, M., Ngan, V. T. K., & Nguyen, P. N. D. (2022). Greenwash and green brand equity: The mediating role of green brand image, green satisfaction and green trust and the moderating role of information and knowledge. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(4), 904-922.
- Hair Jr, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V.G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
- Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hussain Shah, M. (2022). Impact of green marketing strategy on business performance-mediating role of corporate image in construction industry of Kenya. Arthatama: Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(1).
- Hussey, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students. Macmillan.
- Jamali, D., Lund-Thomsen, P., & Khara, N. (2017). CSR institutionalized myths in developing countries: An imminent threat of selective decoupling. Business & Society, 56(3), 454-486.
- Jenkins, H. (2006). Small business champions for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241-256.
- Jenkins, H. (2009). A ‘business opportunity’ model of corporate social responsibility for small- and medium-sized enterprises. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 18(1), 21-36.
- Kraus, S., Burtscher, J., Vallaster, C., & Angerer, M. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship orientation: A reflection on status-quo research on factors facilitating responsible managerial practices. Sustainability, 10(2), Article 444.
- Lee, M. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53-73.
- Leonidou, C. N., Katsikeas, C. S., & Morgan, N. A. (2013). “Greening” the marketing mix: Do firms do it and does it pay off? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 151-170.
- Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., Fotiadis, T. A., & Zeriti, A. (2013). Resources and capabilities as drivers of hotel environmental marketing strategy: Implications for competitive advantage and performance. Tourism Management, 35, 94-110.
- Li, Z., Zhao, X., & Ou, G. (2023). Understanding customer satisfaction in curated subscription services: Moderating roles of subscription time and information disclosure. Information & Management, 60(6), Article 103834.
- Ma, Y., Yin, Q., Pan, Y., Cui, W., Xin, B., & Rao, Z. (2018). Green product innovation and firm performance: Assessing the moderating effect of novelty-centered and efficiency-centered business model design. Sustainability, 10(6), Article 1843.
- Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2374-2383.
- Maziriri, E. T., & Liu, G. (rev. ed.). (2020). Green packaging and green advertising as precursors of competitive advantage and business performance among manufacturing small and medium enterprises in South Africa. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), Article 1719586.
- Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 15(4), 323-338.
- Morsing, M., Schultz, M., & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The ‘Catch 22’ of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 97-111.
- Muralidharan, S., & Sheehan, K. (2018). The role of guilt in influencing sustainable pro-environmental behaviors among shoppers. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(3), 349-362.
- Ottman, J. A. (2011). The new rules of green marketing: Strategies, tools, and inspiration for sustainable branding. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Ottman, J. A., Stafford, E. R., & Hartman, C. L. (2006). Avoiding green marketing myopia: Ways to improve consumer appeal for environmentally preferable products. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 48(5), 22-36.
- Papadas, K.-K., Avlonitis, G. J., & Carrigan, M. (2017). Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 80, 236-246.
- Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research, 8(4), 357-370.
- Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 285-300.
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press; Collier Macmillan.
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2007). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review.
- Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1033-1049.
- Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
- Rocacorba, Q. M., Sardena, K. V., Monique, K., Villarin, S. F., Carmona, H. B., & Almagro, R. E. (2024). Green marketing and corporate social responsibility as predictors of environmental awareness among small and medium enterprises. Psychology and Education, 10, 2024-1934.
- Sarfraz, M., Ivascu, L., Abdullah, M. I., Ozturk, I., & Tariq, J. (2022). Exploring a pathway to sustainable performance in manufacturing firms: The interplay between innovation capabilities, green process and product innovations and digital leadership. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 5945.
- Spence, L. J. (2016). Small business social responsibility: Expanding core CSR theory. Business & Society, 55(1), 23-55.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
- Thuy, A. (2024, May 15). Doanh nghiệp nhỏ và vừa tạo việc làm cho hơn 55% lao động tại Hà Nội [Small and medium enterprises create jobs for more than 55% of workers in Hanoi]. VTV Online. (In Vietnamese).
- Walker, K. (2010). A systematic review of the corporate reputation literature: Definition, measurement, and theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(4), 357-387.