Transparency of sustainability disclosure in agri-food value chain management: Mapping the scientific landscape
-
Author(s)Bodo SteinerLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5357-8856
,
Inna MakarenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7326-5374
,
Kateryna YuhaiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4050-6175
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.21
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 268-287
- 18 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Sustainability transparency in agri-food value chains is crucial for fostering accountability, enhancing consumer trust, facilitating compliance with regulatory standards, and ultimately contributing to the resilience and sustainability of food systems in the face of social, environmental, and economic challenges. This paper aims to conduct bibliometric mapping and a systematic review of the scientific landscape concerning transparency of sustainability disclosure in agri-food value chains by identifying the key transparency dimensions and relevant research gaps. An analysis of 841 Scopus-indexed publications, utilizing Scopus tools, SciVal, VOS Viewer, and Biblioshiny software, yields insights into source and author mapping from 2000 to 2022. Bibliometric analysis underlines the increase in research interests in transparency of sustainability disclosure in agri-food value chains after Sustainable Development Goals adoption and the COVID-19 pandemic, following upwards trend, especially in the UK, India, and the USA. The most influential topic clusters are supply chain, environmentally preferable purchasing, and green practices, as well as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Internet of Things with the strongest co-occurrences between transparency (as the most recent notion in scientific landscape) and sustainability, traceability, supply chains, food supply, and blockchain. Systematic review highlights the evidence that transparency as boundary-spanning phenomenon is explored within the mono-country and chain researches, case studies and interviews methodologies from triple bottom line dimension mainly, only introducing governance criteria. Research gaps were identified regarding the role of transparency in different economic system and chains; sustainability conceptual framework used; transparency dimensions incorporation; technology-driven progress and other chain characteristics (traceability, resilience) intersection.
Acknowledgments
Inna Makarenko is gratefully acknowledging the support of MSCA4Ukraine project no. 1233713.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E01, Q01, Q10, M40, M41
-
References78
-
Tables7
-
Figures12
-
- Figure 1. The dynamic of the agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000–2022 papers
- Figure 2. Agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000–2022: Top countries by institutions output, papers
- Figure 3. Top 10% of the worldwide topic cluster by prominence on agri-food value chains sustainability transparency in 2017–2022
- Figure 4. Relevance and growth rate of critical phrases in agri-food value chains sustainability transparency, 2017–2022
- Figure 5. Keywords co-occurrence bibliometric map on agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000–2022 (network mode)
- Figure 6. Keywords co-occurrence bibliometric map on agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000–2022 (chronology mode)
- Figure 7. Сo-authorship bibliometric map on agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000–2022
- Figure 8. Authors co-citation bibliometric map on agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000–2022
- Figure 9. Author’s production in agri-food value chains sustainability transparency in 2000–2022
- Figure 10. Three field plots (Sankey diagram) on authors (left), countries (middle) and keywords (right) on agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000–2022
- Figure 11. Three field plots (Sankey diagram) on authors (left), sources (middle) and keywords (right) on agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000 – 2022
- Figure 12. The most frequent keywords on agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2000–2022
-
- Table 1. Recent papers with literature reviews in the areas of agri-food value chains transparency of sustainability disclosure in the agri-food value chain
- Table 2. Defining searching strings in agri-food value chains sustainability transparency
- Table 3. Top-10 journals by output in papers of agri-food value chains sustainability transparency search strings in 2002–2022
- Table 4. Top-10 institutions by output in agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications, 2017–2022
- Table 5. The top-10 topics worldwide by prominence in agri-food value chains sustainability transparency publications in 2017–2022
- Table 6. Methodological framework and datasets used for agri-food value chains sustainability transparency
- Table 7. Sustainability transparency dimensions in the researched sample
-
- Ali, M. H., Chung, L., Kumar, A., Zailani, S., & Tan, K. H. (2021). A sustainable Blockchain framework for the halal food supply chain: Lessons from Malaysia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, Article 120870.
- Allaoui, H., Guo, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Decision support for collaboration planning in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 761-774.
- Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2017). Exploring the framework development status for sustainability in supply chain management: A systematic literature synthesis and future research directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(7), 873-892.
- Australian MSA. (2018). Australian Modern Slavery Act 2018.
- Bai, C., Quayson, M., & Sarkis, J. (2022). Analysis of Blockchain’s enablers for improving sustainable supply chain transparency in Africa cocoa industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, Article 131896.
- Bai, C., Shi, B., Liu, F., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Banking credit worthiness: Evaluating the complex relationships. Omega, 83, 26-38.
- Bastian, J., & Zentes, J. (2013). Supply chain transparency as a key prerequisite for sustainable agri-food supply chain management. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 23(5), 553-570.
- Batwa, A., & Norrman, A. (2021). Blockchain technology and trust in supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 203-220.
- Beske, P., Land, A., & Seuring, S. (2014). Sustainable supply chain management practices and dynamic capabilities in the food industry: A critical analysis of the literature. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 131-143.
- Bloise, C. (2020). Collaboration in a circular economy: Learning from the farmers to reduce food waste. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(4), 769-789.
- Bundestag. (2021). Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains.
- Devaney, L., & Henchion, M. (2018a). Consensus, caveats and conditions: International learnings for bioeconomy development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1400-1411.
- Devaney, L., & Henchion, M. (2018b). Who is a Delphi ‘expert’? Reflections on a bioeconomy expert selection procedure from Ireland. Futures, 99, 45-55.
- Dietz, T., Auffenberg, J., Estrella Chong, A., Grabs, J., & Kilian, B. (2018). The Voluntary Coffee Standard Index (VOCSI). Developing a composite index to assess and compare the strength of mainstream voluntary sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Ecological Economics, 150, 72-87.
- Dora, M., Kumar, A., Mangla, S. K., Pant, A., & Kamal, M. M. (2022). Critical success factors influencing artificial intelligence adoption in food supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 60(14), 4621-4640.
- EC. (2019). Fairness in the food supply chain: Commission proposes to increase price transparency.
- EC. (2023). Proposal for a Dierective of the European Parliament and of the Council on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937.
- Ersoy, P., Börühan, G., Kumar Mangla, S., Hormazabal, J. H., Kazancoglu, Y., & Lafcı, Ç. (2022). Impact of information technology and knowledge sharing on circular food supply chains for green business growth. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(5), 1875-1904.
- Faisal, M. N., Sabir, L. B., & Sharif, K. J. (2024). Operationalizing transparency in supply chains using a systematic literature review and graph theoretic approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(4), 1270-1294.
- FDA. (2011). U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act.
- Fischer, C., Hartmann, M., Bavorova, M., Hockmann, H., Suvanto, H., Viitaharju, L., Leat, P. M.K., Revoredo-Giha, C., Henchion, M. M., McGee, C., Dybowski, G., & Kobuszynska, M. (2008). Business relationships and B2B communication in selected European agri-food chains – First empirical evidence. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 11(2), 1-28.
- Fischer, C., Hartmann, M., Reynolds, N., Leat, P., Revoredo-Giha, C., Henchion, M., Albisu, L. M., & Gracia, A. (2009). Factors influencing contractual choice and sustainable relationships in European agri-food supply chains. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36(4), 541-569.
- Freudenreich, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value creation for sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(1), 3-18.
- Fritz, M. M. C. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management. In W. Leal Filho, A. M. Azul, L. Brandli, P. G. Özuyar, & T. Wall (Eds.), Responsible consumption and production (1st ed., pp. 1-14). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Fu, S., Zhan, Y., & Tan, K. H. (2017). Managing social responsibility in Chinese agriculture supply chains through the “a company + farmers” model. European Business Review, 29(3), 344-359.
- Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344-357.
- Gereffi, G., & Lee, J. (2012). Why the world suddenly cares about global supply chains. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(3), 24-32.
- Gong, M., Tan, K. H., Pawar, K., Wong, W. P., & Tseng, M. L. (2015). Information communication technology and sustainable food supply chain: A resource-based analysis. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 7(3), 233.
- Grabs, J., & Carodenuto, S. L. (2021). Traders as sustainability governance actors in global food supply chains: A research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1314-1332.
- Grimm, J. H., Hofstetter, J. S., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Critical factors for sub-supplier management: A sustainable food supply chains perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 159-173.
- Grimm, J. H., Hofstetter, J. S., & Sarkis, J. (2016). Exploring sub-suppliers’ compliance with corporate sustainability standards. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1971-1984.
- Gualandris, J., Longoni, A., Luzzini, D., & Pagell, M. (2021). The association between supply chain structure and transparency: A large-scale empirical study. Journal of Operations Management, 67(7), 803-827.
- Hamprecht, J., Corsten, D., Noll, M., & Meier, E. (2005). Controlling the sustainability of food supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 7-10.
- Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904-2915.
- Kabbiri, R., Dora, M., Kumar, V., Elepu, G., & Gellynck, X. (2018). Mobile phone adoption in agri-food sector: Are farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa connected? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 253-261.
- Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Modeling the blockchain enabled traceability in agriculture supply chain. International Journal of Information Management, 52, Article 101967.
- Kazancoglu, Y., Ekinci, E., Mangla, S. K., Sezer, M. D., & Kayikci, Y. (2021). Performance evaluation of reverse logistics in food supply chains in a circular economy using system dynamics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 71-91.
- Kittipanya-ngam, P., & Tan, K. H. (2020). A framework for food supply chain digitalization: Lessons from Thailand. Production Planning & Control, 31(2-3), 158-172.
- Kong, D. (2012). Does corporate social responsibility matter in the food industry? Evidence from a nature experiment in China. Food Policy, 37(3), 323-334.
- Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, Article 107831.
- Kühne, B., Gellynck, X., & Weaver, R. D. (2013). The influence of relationship quality on the innovation capacity in traditional food chains. Supply Chain Management, 18(1), 52-65.
- Kumar Mangla, S., Börühan, G., Ersoy, P., Kazancoglu, Y., & Song, M. (2021). Impact of information hiding on circular food supply chains in business-to-business context. Journal of Business Research, 135, 1-18.
- Kumar, A., Srivastava, S. K., & Singh, S. (2022a). How blockchain technology can be a sustainable infrastructure for the agrifood supply chain in developing countries. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 15(3), 380-405.
- Kumar, M., Sharma, M., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., & Choubey, V. K. (2022b). Performance assessment of circular driven sustainable agri-food supply chain towards achieving sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, Article 133698.
- Mangla, S. K., Bhattacharya, A., Yadav, A. K., Sharma, Y. K., Ishizaka, A., Luthra, S., & Chakraborty, R. (2021). A framework to assess the challenges to food safety initiatives in an emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 284, Article 124709.
- Mangla, S. K., Kazancoglu, Y., Ekinci, E., Liu, M., Özbiltekin, M., & Sezer, M. D. (2021). Using system dynamics to analyze the societal impacts of blockchain technology in milk supply chainsrefer. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 149, Article 102289.
- Mangla, S. K., Kazançoğlu, Y., Yıldızbaşı, A., Öztürk, C., & Çalık, A. (2022). A conceptual framework for blockchain-based sustainable supply chain and evaluating implementation barriers: A case of the tea supply chain. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(8), 3693-3716.
- Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., Rich, N., Kumar, D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Enablers to implement sustainable initiatives in agri-food supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 379-393.
- Matos, S., & Hall, J. (2007). Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1083-1102.
- McGreevy, S. R., Rupprecht, C. D. D., Niles, D., Wiek, A., Carolan, M., Kallis, G., Kantamaturapoj, K., Mangnus, A., Jehlička, P., Taherzadeh, O., Sahakian, M., Chabay, I., Colby, A., Vivero-Pol, J.-L., Chaudhuri, R., Spiegelberg, M., Kobayashi, M., Balázs, B., Tsuchiya, K., … Tachikawa, M. (2022). Sustainable agrifood systems for a post-growth world. Nature Sustainability, 5(12), 1011-1017.
- Meemken, E.-M., Barrett, C. B., Michelson, H. C., Qaim, M., Reardon, T., & Sellare, J. (2021). Sustainability standards in global agrifood supply chains. Nature Food, 2(10), 758-765.
- Molnár, A., Gellynck, X., & Weaver, R. (2010). Chain member perception of chain performance: The role of relationship quality. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 10(1), 27-49.
- Morgan, T. R., Gabler, C. B., & Manhart, P. S. (2023). Supply chain transparency: Theoretical perspectives for future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(5), 1422-1445.
- Morgan, T. R., Roath, A. S., & Richey, R. G. (2023). How risk, transparency, and knowledge influence the adaptability and flexibility dimensions of the responsiveness view. Journal of Business Research, 158, Article 113641.
- Negri, M., Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7), 2858-2886.
- Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2011). Global value chains meet innovation systems: Are there learning opportunities for developing countries? World Development, 39(7), 1261-1269.
- Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., & Zailani, S. (2021). Big data for sustainable agri-food supply chains: A review and future research perspectives. Journal of Data, Information and Management, 3, 167-182.
- Roth, A. V., Tsay, A. A., Pullman, M. E., & Gray, J. V. (2008). Unraveling the food supply chain: Strategic insights from China and the 2007 recalls. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(1), 22-39.
- Schäfer, N. (2023). Making transparency transparent: A systematic literature review to define and frame supply chain transparency in the context of sustainability. Management Review Quarterly, 73(2), 579-604.
- Scholten, K., & Schilder, S. (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management, 20(4), 471-484.
- Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., & Biancone, P. (2021). Blockchain, trust, and trust accounting: Can blockchain technology substitute trust created by intermediaries in trust accounting? A theoretical examination. International Journal of Management Practice, 14(2), 129-145.
- Sharma, Y. K., Mangla, S. K., Patil, P. P., & Liu, S. (2019). When challenges impede the process: For circular economy-driven sustainability practices in food supply chain. Management Decision, 57(4), 995-1017.
- Silvestri, C., Silvestri, L., Piccarozzi, M., & Ruggieri, A. (2022). Toward a framework for selecting indicators of measuring sustainability and circular economy in the agri-food sector: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 29, 1446-1484.
- Singh, R. Kr., Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., & Uniyal, S. (2019). Applications of information and communication technology for sustainable growth of SMEs in India food industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 147, 10-18.
- Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2019). Research opportunities in supply chain transparency. Production and Operations Management, 28(12), 2946-2959.
- State of California. (2010). The California Transparency in Supply Chains Act.
- Steiner, B. (2006). Governance reform of German food safety regulation: Cosmetic or real? In C. Ansell & D. Vogel (Eds.), European Food Safety Regulation: The Challenge of Multi-Level Governance (pp. 181-210). MIT Press.
- Steiner, B. E. (2007). Negotiated transfer pricing: Theory and implications for value chains in agribusiness. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 23(2), 279-292.
- Steiner, B. E. (2017). A phenomenon-driven approach to the study of value creation and organizational design issues in agri-business value chains. Economia Agro-Alimentare, 1, 89-118.
- Tsolakis, N., Niedenzu, D., Simonetto, M., Dora, M., & Kumar, M. (2021). Supply network design to address United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A case study of blockchain implementation in Thai fish industry. Journal of Business Research, 131, 495-519.
- UK MSA. (2015). United Kingdom’s Modern Slavery Act 2015.
- United Nations. (n.d.). Food security and nutrition and sustainable agriculture.
- Wesana, J., De Steur, H., Dora, M. K., Mutenyo, E., Muyama, L., & Gellynck, X. (2018). Towards nutrition sensitive agriculture. Actor readiness to reduce food and nutrient losses or wastes along the dairy value chain in Uganda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 46-56.
- Yadav, N., Luthra, S., & Garg, D. (2023). Blockchain technology for sustainable supply chains: A network cluster analysis and future research propositions. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 30, 64779-64799.
- Yadav, S., Garg, D., & Luthra, S. (2021). Development of IoT based data-driven agriculture supply chain performance measurement framework. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(1), 292-327.
- Yadav, S., Garg, D., & Luthra, S. (2022). Ranking of performance indicators in an Internet of Things (IoT)-based traceability system for the agriculture supply chain (ASC). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 39(3), 777-803.
- Yakovleva, N., Sarkis, J., & Sloan, T. (2012). Sustainable benchmarking of supply chains: The case of the food industry. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1297-1317.
- Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18-19), 4333-4355.
-
Research on management theory: A development review and bibliometric analysis
Ilona Skačkauskienė
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.28
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 20, 2022 Issue #2 pp. 335-347 Views: 1029 Downloads: 2431 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWhile the literature on management theory has been growing in recent years, there are no publications regarding the evolution and mapping of this scientific field. This study dwells on the issues related to management theories in the context of today’s research by identifying the most important lines of research, researchers, and the concentration of research. To explore the trends in the development of management theory, this study used bibliometric analysis. The search in the Web of Science database provided 5,825 documents (including articles, books, reviews, etc.). Methods of trend analysis, clusterization, and comparative analysis were used. The results show that a new direction of responsible management research is being formed – the organization’s operations and objectives must be balanced, and their implementation must be responsible. This study enriches management literature by providing new ideas related to future research tendencies. Moreover, it fleshes out the direction for developing management theory and outlines the most-cited works and authors, the research concentration in different countries, and leading journals. For scholars and practitioners, such structured data are an important source of relevant information in published papers and allows for the definition of research guidelines.
-
Mapping the literature on Gen Z purchasing behavior: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer
Pingxiu Li ,
Siti Hasnah Hassan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.19(3).2023.06
Generation Z makes up the largest proportion of the world’s population and owns active spending power. Born in the internet information age, they have diverse values and consumer behaviors compared to other cohorts of generations. While there has been a significant increase in research on the purchasing behavior of Generation Z in recent years, there are particularly few bibliometric studies in this field. This study aims to sort out the current research status on the purchasing behavior of Generation Z, identify the evolution of purchasing behavior research of Generation Z, determine key research hotspots, and explore future research directions and priority suggestions by analyzing the current literature. The bibliometric analysis is based on the citation information of 638 literature items about Generation Z purchasing behavior in the Scopus database. The results sort out the knowledge structure of the purchasing behavior domain of Generation Z and draw a visual map of the network. Four popular research themes are identified based on keyword co-occurrence analysis, namely the influencing factors of Generation Z consumption behavior, the comparative study with other generations of consumers, the analysis from the perspective of human demography, and the study of sustainable consumption behavior. Studies on Generation Z consumers’ spending habits from 2001 to 2022 may be divided into three stages related to the growth process of Generation Z. Future research should focus on the influence of social media on the purchasing behavior of Generation Z and the sustainability of their consumption patterns.
-
An overview of investor sentiment: Identifying themes, trends, and future direction through bibliometric analysis
Aditi N. Kamath ,
Sandeep S. Shenoy ,
Subrahmanya Kumar N.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.19(3).2022.19
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 19, 2022 Issue #3 pp. 229-242 Views: 907 Downloads: 376 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯInvestor sentiment is the result of trading behavior and irrational beliefs of investors leading to high volatility and market mispricing. This review aims to study the entire spectrum of articles in the domain of investor sentiment using a bibliometric analysis approach. To this end, the study analyzes a total of 1,919 articles published in the Scopus database between 1979 and 2022. The review uncovers major themes, leading authors, influencing articles, trend topics, top contributing countries, and affiliations. The review shows that the research in the domain of investor sentiment is growing exponentially with an annual growth rate of 15.88%, and the year 2020 witnessed the highest number of scientific productions accounting for 252 (13.68%) total publications. The results display that the USA and China are leading countries in terms of the total contribution and volume of studies from respective authors. The review also reveals that existing research in the field has mainly focused on themes such as market efficiency, asset pricing, stock returns, sentiment analysis, IPO underpricing, overreaction, and volatility, whereas Covid-19 and Bitcoin depicted as emerging themes from recent scholarly works.
