Management of social responsibility strategies of multinational corporations in russia during the war against Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.08
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 95-107
- 100 Views
-
17 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study examined how multinational corporations adapted their corporate social responsibility strategies while operating in russia during the ongoing war against Ukraine. Specifically, the analysis investigated the impact of different corporate social responsibility approaches on financial performance, stakeholder trust, and corporate reputation for multinational corporations operating in russia during the war. A game-theoretic model evaluated three distinct strategies: minimal corporate social responsibility engagement (Strategy 1), increased corporate social responsibility involvement (Strategy 2), and a complete exit from the russian market (Strategy 3). The quantitative analysis showed that companies choosing the exit strategy (Strategy 3) gained the highest payoffs for financial performance, stakeholder trust, and reputation. In contrast, minimal corporate social responsibility engagement (Strategy 1) resulted in negative outcomes, including reputational damage and potential exposure to sanctions. On the other hand, increased corporate social responsibility involvement (Strategy 2) produced neutral outcomes, offering short-term benefits but still leaving companies vulnerable to ongoing risks. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of these outcomes. The study concludes that exiting the russian market not only aligns with ethical standards but also ensures long-term sustainability, offering critical insights for corporations navigating corporate social responsibility challenges in war zones.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely express our gratitude to Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Marko Sarstedt, the LMU Fellowship Grant (LMU Ukraine support-fund) for the support of Ukrainian scientists.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, F23, Q56, D81
-
References37
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Strategy and stakeholder payoff
- Table 2. Methodological steps involved in the game theoretical analysis
- Table 3. Payoffs for the multinational corporation and stakeholders across the three strategies
- Table 4. Payoff matrix for multinational corporations under sanctions
- Table 5. Payoff matrix outcomes for both the multinational corporations and stakeholder
- Table 6. Sensitivity analysis
-
- Ahmad, N., Scholz, M., Ullah, Z., Arshad, M. Z., Sabir, R. I., & Khan, W. A. (2021). The nexus of CSR and co-creation: A roadmap towards consumer loyalty. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 523.
- Arenas, D., Albareda, L., & Goodman, J. (2020). Contestation in multi-stakeholder initiatives: Enhancing the democratic quality of transnational governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30(2), 169-199.
- Carroll, A. B. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR construct’s development and future. Business & Society, 60(6), 1258-1278.
- Cezarino, L. O., Liboni, L. B., Hunter, T., Pacheco, L. M., & Martins, F. P. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: Opportunities and challenges for sustainability integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, Article 132224.
- Chaffetz, M. (2021). Disentangling conflict and minerals: How NGOs and lawmakers ought to rebrand their flawed narrative of Eastern Congo. Virginia Journal of International Law, 62, 203-234.
- Chychun, V., Chaplynska, N., Shpatakova, O., Pankova, A., Saienko, V. (2023). Effective Management in the Remote Work Environment. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13(3).
- Cooley, A., & Nexon, D. H. (2022). The real crisis of global order: Illiberalism on the rise. Foreign Affairs, 101, 103-113.
- Cozad, M. R., Engstrom, J. G., Harold, S., Heath, T. R., Lilly, S., Burke, E. J., Brackup, J., & Grossman, D. (2023). Gaining victory in systems warfare: China’s perspective on the US-China military balance. RAND Corporation.
- Daradkeh, M. (2023). Navigating the complexity of entrepreneurial ethics: A systematic review and future research agenda. Sustainability, 15(14), Article 11099.
- Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M., & Newburry, W. (2020). The grass is always greener: The impact of home and host country CSR reputation signaling on cross-country investments. Journal of International Business Policy, 3, 154-182.
- Dooranov, A., Orozonova, A., & Alamanova, C. (2022). The Economic Basis for the Training of Specialists in the Field of Personal Management: Prospects for the Future. Futurity Economics&Law, 2(1), 35-49.
- Dresse, A., Nielsen, J. Ø., & Fischhendler, I. (2021). From corporate social responsibility to environmental peacebuilding: The case of bauxite mining in Guinea. Resources Policy, 74, Article 102290.
- Evenett, S. J., & Pisani, N. (2023). Geopolitics, conflict, and decoupling: Evidence of Western divestment from Russia during 2022. Journal of International Business Policy, 6(4), 511-540.
- Fallah Shayan, N., Mohabbati-Kalejahi, N., Alavi, S., & Zahed, M. A. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1222.
- Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2), 213-231.
- Gevorgyan, S., & Baghdasaryan, K. (2021). Toward a Transhumanist Transformation of Human Labor Potential in the Context of Global Challenges. Futurity Economics & Law, 1(4), 36-45.
- Girschik, V., & Hotho, J. (2021). Managing the unavoidable: New avenues for research on MNEs and societal crises. In A research agenda for international business and management (pp. 175-194). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Green, M. (2021). Theoretical developments in corporate social responsibility. In D. Crowther & S. Seifi (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 47-73). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hammouri, S. (2022). The involvement of corporate actors in war and international law: A study in the politics of representations (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Manchester.
- Hook, K., & Marcantonio, R. (2023). Environmental dimensions of conflict and paralyzed responses: The ongoing case of Ukraine and future implications for urban warfare. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 34(8), 1400-1428.
- Kaplina, O. (2022). Prisoner of War: Special Status in the Criminal Proceedings of Ukraine and the Right to Exchange. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 5(4-2), 8-24.
- Kumar, A. (2021). Analysis of the principle of subsidiarity as a principle of EU law: Future perspectives. Futurity Economics & Law, 1(4), 18-27.
- Maier, A. L. (2021). Political corporate social responsibility in authoritarian contexts. Journal of International Business Policy, 4, 476-495.
- Melin, M. M. (2021). The building and breaking of peace: Corporate activities in civil war prevention and resolution. Oxford University Press.
- Onopriienko, A., Hrybanovskyi, O., & Shapoval, N. (2023, May 20). How the income of foreign businesses in the Russian Federation has changed in 2022 and why so many companies still do not leave. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Owens, M. D. (2022). Exploiting bullets: International business and the dynamics of war. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 18(5), 640-665.
- Panwar, R., Pandey, V., Suddaby, R., & Vidal, N. G. (2023). Did India’s CSR mandate enhance or diminish firm value? Business & Society, 62(2), 401-433.
- Parella, K. (2023). Corporate foreign policy in war. Boston College Law Review, 63.
- Saha, R., Shashi, Cerchione, R., Singh, R., & Dahiya, R. (2020). Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 409-429.
- Sari, T. K., Cahaya, F. R., & Joseph, C. (2021). Coercive pressures and anti-corruption reporting: The case of ASEAN countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 171, 495-511.
- Shah, S. S., & Shah, T. (2023). Responsible consumption choices and individual values: An algebraic interactive approach. Mind & Society, 22, 1-32.
- Siltaloppi, J., Rajala, R., & Hietala, H. (2021). Integrating CSR with business strategy: A tension management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 174, 507-527.
- Skiba, R. (2024). Shadows of catastrophe: Navigating modern suffering risks in a vulnerable society. After Midnight Publishing.
- Tripathi, S. (2023). Business and conflict. In A. Ewing (Ed.), Teaching business and human rights (pp. 427-445). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Vadakkepatt, G. G., Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., Zinn, W., Beitelspacher, L., Aloysius, J., Ginger, J., & Reilman, J. (2021). Sustainable retailing. Journal of Retailing, 97(1), 62-80.
- Wirba, A. V. (2024). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of government in promoting CSR. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 7428-7454.
- Yuan, J., Shahzad, M. F., Waheed, A., & Wang, W. (2023). Sustainable development in brand loyalty: Exploring the dynamics of corporate social responsibility, customer attitudes, and emotional contagion. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 1042-1051.