Effect of corporate voluntary disclosure on corporate performance: Evidence from a transitional economy
-
Author(s)Mofijul Hoq MasumLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3173-2688
,
Sarkar James BakulLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1329-8983
,
Hassan Nazmul
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.31
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 414-426
- 49 Views
-
8 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Corporate performance is one of the core pillars of accelerating the economic growth of any economy. There are some direct and indirect components of corporate performance. This study is conducted to measure the impact of indirect factors, such as corporate voluntary disclosures, on corporate performance. A sample of 872 annual reports is investigated. A content analysis has been conducted to measure voluntary disclosure. The study employs the short panel data, fixed model regression, and Panel Corrected Standard Error (PCSE). The analysis indicates that corporate voluntary disclosure has influenced the return on assets with a regression coefficient of 0.0724 at p ≤ 0.01. Corporate voluntary disclosure in the transitional economy significantly influences corporate performance. However, the volume of corporate voluntary reporting in energy-related disclosure and climate-related disclosure is minimal, as the mean is only 2.21% and 2.31%. This implies that the government of the transitional economy may focus on persuading corporations to disclose additional information besides mandatory disclosure. In addition, indirect determinant of corporate performance, like corporate voluntary disclosure, brings sustainability to corporate performance, which further assists the transitional economy in shifting its economic status from one dimension to another.
Acknowledgment
The authors are very thankful to the Institute of Advanced Research, United International University, Bangladesh, for providing partial funds to complete this empirical study.
This project is partially funded by the Institute for Advanced Research Publication Grant of United International University, Ref. No.: IAR-2024-Pub-069.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, G30, L25
-
References66
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Dimensions of voluntary disclosures
- Table 2. Measurement of variables
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics – Voluntary disclosure
- Table 4. Descriptive statistics – Control variables
- Table 5. Correlation matrix
- Table 6. Effect of corporate voluntary disclosure on corporate performance
- Table A1. Robustness test – Corporate voluntary disclosure and corporate performance
-
- Ahmed, U., Khalid, N., Ahmed, A., & Shah, M. H. (2017). Assessing moderation of employee engagement on the relationship between work discretion, job clarity and business performance in the banking sector of Pakistan. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 7(12), 1197-1210.
- Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality and the market mechanism. Journal Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
- Al-Dmour, A., Abbod, M., & Al-Balqa, N. (2018). The impact of the quality of financial reporting on non-financial business performance and the role of organizations demographic’ attributes (type, size and experience). Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 1-18.
- Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 187-216.
- Alnabsha, A., Abdou, H. A., Ntim, C. G., & Elamer, A. A. (2018). Corporate boards, ownership structures and corporate disclosures: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(1), 20-41.
- Aras, G., Aybars, A., & Kutlu, O. (2010). Managing corporate performance: Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59(3), 229-254.
- Belal, A. R. (2000). Environmental reporting in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Eco-Management and Auditing: The Journal of Corporate Environmental Management, 7(3), 114-121.
- Belal, A. R., Cooper, S. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2013). Vulnerable and exploitable: The need for organisational accountability and transparency in emerging and less developed economies. Accounting Forum, 37(2), 81-91.
- Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2007). Drivers of corporate voluntary disclosure: A framework and empirical evidence from Italy and the United States. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(2), 269-296.
- Botosan, C. A., & Plumlee, M. A. (2002). A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1), 21-40.
- Choi, J.-S., Kwak, Y.-M., & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35(3), 291-311.
- Clarkson, P. M., Fang, X., Li, Y., & Richardson, G. (2013). The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(5), 410-431.
- Cotter, J., Lokman, N., & Najah, M. M. (2011). Voluntary disclosure research: Which theory is relevant? The Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 6(2), 77-95.
- Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674-686.
- Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59-100.
- Diamond, D. W., & Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325-1359.
- Elfeky, M. I. (2017). The extent of voluntary disclosure and its determinants in emerging markets: Evidence from Egypt. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 3(1-4), 45-59.
- Fauzi, F., & Locke, S. (2012). Board structure, ownership structure and firm performance: A study of New Zealand listed-firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), 8(2), 43-67.
- Gakhar, D. V. (2012). Perception of stakeholders on web-based corporate reporting practices. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 9(1), 64-76.
- Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2-3), 233-262.
- García-Meca, E., & Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P. (2010). The association of board independence and ownership concentration with voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. European Accounting Review, 19(3), 603-627.
- Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(3-4), 327-356.
- Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall.
- Hackston, D., & Milne, M. J. (1996). Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77-108.
- Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430.
- Ho, P.-L., & Taylor, G. (2013). Corporate governance and different types of voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Malaysian listed firms. Pacific Accounting Review, 25(1), 4-29.
- Ho, S. S., & Wong, K. S. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), 139-156.
- Hossain, M., & Hammami, H. (2009). Voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of an emerging country: The case of Qatar. Advances in Accounting, 25(2), 255-265.
- Inchausti, B. G. (1997). The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. European Accounting Review, 6(1), 45-68.
- Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2008). Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information: Evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(6), 850-874.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
- Kamel, H., & Awadallah, E. (2017). The extent of voluntary corporate disclosure in the Egyptian stock exchange: Its determinants and consequences. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(2), 266-291.
- Kolsi, M. C. (2017). The determinants of corporate voluntary disclosure policy: Evidence from the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX). Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7(2), 249-265.
- Masum, M. H., Alam, M. F., & Alam, M. S. (2024). Effect of board and ownership attributes on corporate performance in transition economy. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2369708.
- Masum, M. H., Latiff, A. R. A., & Osman, M. N. H. (2020). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosures in transition economy. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 7(10), 601-611.
- Masum, M. H., Latiff, A. R. A., & Osman, M. N. H. (2021). Determinants of corporate voluntary disclosure in a transition economy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 130-141.
- McNally, G. M., Eng, L. H., & Hasseldine, C. R. (1982). Corporate financial reporting in New Zealand: An analysis of user preferences, corporate characteristics and disclosure practices for discretionary information. Accounting and Business Research, 13(49), 11-20.
- Md Zaini, S., Samkin, G., Sharma, U., & Davey, H. (2018). Voluntary disclosure in emerging countries: A literature review. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(1), 29-65.
- Meek, G. K., Roberts, C. B., & Gray, S. J. (1995). Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 555-572.
- Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(3), 353-372.
- Nguyen, T. M. H., Nguyen, N. T., & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). Factors affecting voluntary information disclosure on annual reports: Listed companies in Ho Chi Minh city stock exchange. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(3), 53-62.
- Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size comfound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167-180.
- Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
- Patelli, L., & Prencipe, A. (2007). The relationship between voluntary disclosure and independent directors in the presence of a dominant shareholder. European Accounting Review, 16(1), 5-33.
- Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), 336-361.
- Qiu, Y., Shaukat, A., & Tharyan, R. (2016). Environmental and social disclosures: Link with corporate financial performance. The British Accounting Review, 48(1), 102-116.
- Qu, W., Leung, P., & Cooper, B. (2013). A study of voluntary disclosure of listed Chinese firms – A stakeholder perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(3), 261-294.
- Rahman Belal, A., Rezaul Kabir, M., Cooper, S., Dey, P., Ahmed Khan, N., Rahman, T., & Ali, M. (2010). Corporate environmental and climate change disclosures: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. In M. Tsamenyi & S. Uddin (Eds.), Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies (pp. 145-167). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Raza, A., Ilyas, M. I., Rauf, R., & Qamar, R. (2012). Relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate financial performance (CFP): Literature review approach. Elixir Financial Management, 46(9), 8404-8409.
- Rezaee, Z., & Tuo, L. (2017). Voluntary disclosure of non-financial information and its association with sustainability performance. Advances in Accounting, 39, 47-59.
- Ronen, J., & Yaari, V. (1993). The disclosure policy of the firm in an efficient market. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 3, 311-324.
- Sahasranamam, S., Arya, B., & Sud, M. (2019). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37, 1165-1192.
- Saleh, M., Zulkifli, N., & Muhamad, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(6), 591-613.
- Sarhan, A. A., & Ntim, C. G. (2019). Corporate boards, shareholding structures and voluntary disclosure in emerging MENA economies. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 2-27.
- Sarhan, A. A., Ntim, C. G., & Al-Najjar, B. (2019). Board diversity, corporate governance, corporate performance, and executive pay. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 24(2), 761-786.
- Shroff, N., Sun, A., White, H., & Zhang, W. (2013). Voluntary disclosure and information asymmetry: Evidence from the 2005 securities offering reform. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(5), 1299-1345.
- Shukla, A., & Gekara, M. G. (2010). Effects of multinational mergers and acquisitions on shareholders’ wealth and corporate performance. The IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 9(1&2), 44-62.
- Singhvi, S. S., & Desai, H. B. (1971). An empirical analysis of the quality of corporate financial disclosure. The Accounting Review, 46(1), 129-138.
- Skinner, D. J. (1994). Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 38-60.
- Usenko, L., & Zenkina, I. (2016). Modern trends and issues of corporate reporting data disclosure on organization activities. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 212-212.
- Uyar, A., & Kılıç, M. (2012). Value relevance of voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Turkish firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(3), 363-376.
- Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
- Wallace, R. O., & Naser, K. (1995). Firm-specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14(4), 311-368.
- Wallace, R. S., Naser, K., & Mora, A. (1994). The relationship between the comprehensiveness of corporate annual reports and firm characteristics in Spain. Accounting and Business Research, 25(97), 41-53.
- Wang, K., Sewon, O., & Claiborne, M. C. (2008). Determinants and consequences of voluntary disclosure in an emerging market: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 17(1), 14-30.
- Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. Accounting Review, 65(1), 131-156.
-
Why banks should consider ESG risk factors in bank lending?
Sarwar Uddin Ahmed ,
Samiul Parvez Ahmed ,
Ikramul Hasan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(3).2018.07
Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 71-80 Views: 2862 Downloads: 1146 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯWhy banks should be concerned about incorporating environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in the lending process? What is the motivation? This study aims to find the motives for considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria in bank lending process. A primary survey has been conducted to know the current status and motivation for incorporating ESG factors in investment decisions. Sample comprised 30 private commercial banks (PCBs) operating in Bangladesh. Data collected were analyzed with graphs, descriptive statistics, and regression analysis. Findings of the study indicate that banks are mostly considering basic environmental, social and governance factors set by regulators qualitatively. They are lagging behind in considering the advanced ESG criteria needed for sustainable and efficient credit risk management. Based on motivation for incorporating ESG factors, it was found that banks pioneering in incorporating ESG factors in lending decisions are compensated through better financial performance. Findings of the study are expected to encourage practitioners and policy-makers to take more pragmatic steps to incorporate ESG risk factors quantitatively in lending decision-making process.
-
A study on the effect of service quality on customer loyalty and corporate performance in financial industry
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 (cont. 2) pp. 355-363 Views: 2227 Downloads: 722 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯSince the government opened to the establishment of new private banks in 1990s, the competition in banking industry has become fierce in Taiwan. Especially, the establishment of financial holding companies after 2000s has resulted in the merge among financial institutions. The competition in banking industry becomes even fiercer. The price war of interest rate among banks gradually shortens the deposit and lending rate difference in banking industry that banks could no longer survive with the traditional business of deposit and lending rate differences. Banks have to attract customers with different service quality, satisfy customer needs, and create new profits for banking industry. Generally speaking, service quality is related to customer satisfaction after receiving service, and satisfaction becomes the internal assessment indicator of financial industry for customers. A lot of excellent foreign businesses or national financial institutions present brilliant competitiveness in the field of finance by the specialty and service quality. Taking Land Bank of Taiwan as the research subject, this study aims to discuss the effect of service quality on customer loyalty and corporate performance in financial industry.
It is discovered in this study that an enterprise enhancing the service quality through the mediation effect of customer loyalty could effectively promote the corporate performance. For this reason, the relationship between customer loyalty and service quality, corporate performance are established in this study, and the results of the analysis could be the reference for banking industry in Taiwan. -
Corporate social responsibility practices of banks in Bangladesh: a structuration theory perspective
Esinath Ndiweni ,
Faizul Haque ,
Mostafa Kamal Hassan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.29
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 350-360 Views: 2063 Downloads: 659 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe aim of this paper is to illuminate the role of the socio-economic, cultural and religious context in shaping corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices of banks in Bangladesh. The authors utilize content analysis of annual reports and websites of banks to identify CSR activities in healthcare, education and financial inclusion sectors. Structuration theory (ST) is used to explain how interactions between bank managers (as agents) with the social structures (institutions and government) shape CSR practices. The findings show that banks’ engagement in CSR activities is embedded in the social fabric of Bangladesh and not a result of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). It is also noted that Islamic banks focus their CSR activities on social justice, while other banks target education and other humanitarian issues. The authors contribute to the literature on the determinants of CSR by revealing the rationalizations of different actors in the production and reproduction of CSR practices in Bangladesh, an insight attributed to ST. The researchers conclude that Islamic beliefs influenced managers to mitigate poverty through CSR investments.
