Determinants of sustainability performance in information technology companies: Cooperation through strategic alliances and business strategies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.24
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 310-323
- 13 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The rapid progress in information technology has presented both opportunities and challenges for companies, particularly within the IT industry in Indonesia. This study examines the impact of hybrid business strategies and corporate strategic alliances on the sustainability performance of IT companies. Adopting quantitative methods, data were collected from 389 management professionals in IT companies through a structured questionnaire. The analysis employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the relationships between hybrid business strategies, strategic alliances, and sustainability performance. The results indicate that hybrid business strategies positively influence corporate strategic alliances (t-value = 2.243, p-value = 0.025) and positively influence corporate sustainability performance (t-value = 5.294, p-value = 0.000). Additionally, corporate strategic alliances significantly enhance sustainability performance (t-value = 5.603, p-value = 0.000), mediating the relationship between hybrid strategies and sustainability outcomes (t-value = 1.995, p-value = 0.047). The findings emphasize the critical role of strategic alliances in achieving long-term sustainability goals in the IT industry. The study concludes that integrating hybrid business strategies with effective strategic alliances is essential for IT companies to maintain competitiveness and achieve sustainable growth.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L25, L24, O32, M15
-
References45
-
Tables8
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
- Figure 2. Research model
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of respondents
- Table 2. Validity results
- Table 3. Reliability results
- Table 4. R-square results
- Table 5. Summary of hypothesis testing
- Table 6. Model fit results
- Table A1. Questionnaire: Personal data
- Table A2. Questionnaire: Assessing hybrid business strategy, corporate strategic alliance, and corporate sustainability performance
-
- Aceves, L. R., Monroy, V. B., & Solís, E. R. (2018). Environmental dynamism as a moderator of familiness and performance in Mexican SMEs. Latin American Business Review, 19(3-4), 219-243.
- Agyapong, A., Amanor, K., & Poku, K. (2016). Antecedents to the implementation of hybrid strategy in a dynamic business environment-an econometric analysis of business decisions in Ghana. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 21(4).
- Alnoor, A., Khaw, K. W., Al-Abrrow, H., & Alharbi, R. K. (2022). The hybrid strategy on the basis of Miles and Snow and Porter’s strategies: An overview of the current state-of-the-art of research. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 14.
- Anwar, J., & Hasnu, S. A. F. (2017). Strategy-performance relationships: A comparative analysis of pure, hybrid, and reactor strategies. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 14(4), 446-465.
- Asha’ari, M. J., & Daud, S. (2018). Sustainable transport and corporate sustainability performance: Moderating role of organization age. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.35), 693-699.
- Cacciolatti, L., Rosli, A., Ruiz-Alba, J. L., & Chang, J. (2020). Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission. Journal of Business Research, 106, 106-117.
- Chang, M. H., Liou, J. J. H., & Lo, H. W. (2019). A hybrid MCDM model for evaluating strategic alliance partners in the green biopharmaceutical industry. Sustainability, 11(15), Article 4065.
- Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2009). Survey research: Process and limitations. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(1), 9-15.
- Garg, C. P. (2016). A robust hybrid decision model for evaluation and selection of the strategic alliance partner in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 52, 55-66.
- Gao, Z., & Hands, D. (2021). The strategic role of design in driving digital innovation: A theoretical foundation. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 16(1).
- Ge, R., Ji, Y., & Louis, H. (2020). Accounting quality and alliance contract provisions. The Accounting Review, 96(4), 261-287.
- Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural equation modeling: Teori, konsep, dan aplikasi dengan program Lisrel 9.10 [Structural equation modeling: Theory, concepts, and applications with the Lisrel 9.10 program] (4th ed.). Badan Penerbit UNDIP. (In Indonesian).
- Goerzen, A. (2007). Alliance networks and firm performance: The impact of repeated partnerships. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 487-509.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- He, Q., Meadows, M., Angwin, D., Gomes, E., & Child, J. (2020). Strategic alliance research in the era of digital transformation: perspectives on future research. British Journal of Management, 31(3), 589-617.
- Islam, M., Hossain, A. T., & Mia, L. (2018). Role of strategic alliance and innovation on organizational sustainability. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(5), 1581-1596.
- Jiang, H., Wang, Z., Gao, S., Chen, K., & Sheng, F. (2022). Enhancing technology innovation performance through alliance capability: The role of standard alliance network and political skill of TMTs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
- Jiang, X., Jiang, F., Sheng, S., & Wang, G. (2021). A moderated mediation model linking entrepreneurial orientation to strategic alliance performance. British Journal of Management, 32(4), 1338-1358.
- Kamasak, R., Yavuz, M., & Altuntas, G. (2016). Is the relationship between innovation performance and knowledge management contingent on environmental dynamism and learning capability? Evidence from a turbulent market. Business Research, 9(2), 229-253.
- Khedmati, M., Lim, E. K., Naiker, V., & Navissi, F. (2019). Business strategy and the cost of equity capital: An evaluation of pure versus hybrid business strategies. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 31(2), 111-141.
- Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2008). Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 639-661.
- Lee, Y., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). Enhancing alliance performance: The effects of contractual-based versus relational-based governance. Journal of Business Research, 59(8), 896-905.
- Li, D., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793-2799.
- Manning, S., Kannothra, C. G., & Wissman-Weber, N. K. (2017). The strategic potential of community-based hybrid models: The case of global business services in Africa. Global Strategy Journal, 7(1), 125-149.
- Mantecon, T., Song, K., & Luo, H. (2016). The control and performance of joint ventures. Financial Management, 45(2), 431-465.
- Morakanyane, R., Grace, A., & O’Reilly, P. (2017). Conceptualizing digital transformation in business organizations: A systematic review of literature. 30th Bled EConference: Digital Transformation – From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives (pp. 427-444).
- Munir, A., Khan, F. U., Usman, M., & Khuram, S. (2019). Relationship between corporate governance, corporate sustainability and financial performance. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 13(4), 915-933.
- Nguyen, T. T., Le, A. N. H., & Cheng, J. M. S. (2022). The role of alliance portfolio diversity in sustainable supply chain management: An abstract. In F. Pantoja & S. Wu (Eds.), From Micro to Macro: Dealing with Uncertainties in the Global Marketplace. Springer.
- Paracha, A. T., Mahmood, S., Saboor, M. J., & Malik, S. (2019). Evidence of moderating role of organizational culture among strategic alliances and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 14(4).
- Rehman, S., Elrehail, H., Alsaad, A., & Bhatti, A. (2022). Intellectual capital and innovative performance: A mediation-moderation perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(5), 998-1024.
- Seo, E. H., Kim, C. Y., & Kim, K. (2020). A study on the mechanisms linking environmental dynamism to innovation performance. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 9999.
- Shang, H., Chen, R., & Li, Z. (2020). Dynamic sustainability capabilities and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of resource management capabilities. Sustainable Development, 28(4), 595-612.
- Strobl, A., Matzler, K., Nketia, B.A., & Veider, V. (2020). Individual innovation behavior and firm-level exploration and exploitation: How family firms make the most of their managers. Review of Managerial Science, 14(4), 809-844.
- Tang, J., Chen, C., & Tsai, P. (2021). Development of hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach to evaluate key factors for marketing strategic alliance formation based on multiple theories. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(1), 241-261.
- Tang, Y. M., Chau, K. Y., Fatima, A., & Waqas, M. (2022). Industry 4.0 technology and circular economy practices: Business management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 49752-49769.
- Teng, X., Zhong, W., & Feng, Y. (2022). Research on the relationship between digital transformation and performance of SMEs. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 6012.
- Tseng, M. L., Lim, M. K., & Wu, K. J. (2018). Corporate sustainability performance improvement using an interrelationship hierarchical model approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1334-1346.
- Wang, C. H., Chen, Y. C., Sulistiawan, J., Bui, T. D., & Tseng, M. L. (2021). Hybrid approach to corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia’s cement industry. Sustainability, 13(24), Article 14039.
- Wang, M., & Teng, W. (2022). Digital innovation and firm environmental performance: The mediating role of supply chain management capabilities. Frontiers Psychology, 13.
- Wang, X., Gu, Y., Mahmood, A., & Chaokai, X. (2022). The impact of digital capability on manufacturing company performance. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 6214.
- Wang, X., Lin, H., & Tian, M. (2020). Corporate sustainability performance of Chinese firms: An empirical analysis from a social responsibility perspective. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(9), 2027-2038.
- Wang, Z., Rafait Mahmood, M., Ullah, H., Hanif, I., Abbas, Q., & Mohsin, M. (2020). Multidimensional perspective of firms’ IT capability between digital business strategy and firms’ efficiency: A case of Chinese SMEs. SAGE Open, 10(4).
- Xie, X., & Zhu, Q. (2020). Exploring an innovative pivot: How green training can spur corporate sustainability performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2432-2449.
- Yang, S., Ishtiaq, M., & Anwar, M. (2018). Enterprise risk management practices and firm performance, the mediating role of competitive advantage and the moderating role of financial literacy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(3), Article 35.
- Yasa, N. K., Sukaatmadja, P. G., Giantari, I. G. A. K., & Yuniari, N. W. (2018). The influence of external environment and resource capability on the hybrid business strategy and business performance. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Business Management (pp. 343-349). Jakarta, Indonesia.