Ambidextrous leadership and financial performance of Indonesian microfinance institutions: The role of business model and environmental dynamism

  • 49 Views
  • 13 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study aims to investigate the relationship between ambidextrous leadership, business models, and financial performance of Indonesia’s microfinance institutions (MFIs) while also exploring the mediating role of business models and the moderating effect of environmental dynamism in this relationship. Data were collected from 104 microfinance institutions in Indonesia and analyzed using the mediation moderation procedure (ModMed) with macro Process 4.0. The results indicate a positive relationship between ambidextrous leadership, business model, and financial performance. As expected, the study also reveals that the MFI business model is positively related to financial performance and mediates the relationship between ambidextrous leadership and financial performance. The moderating analysis has confirmed the role of environmental dynamism in the relationship between business models and financial performance. The findings provide valuable insights for practitioners in the microfinance sector, suggesting that fostering ambidextrous leadership can enhance the effectiveness of business models, ultimately leading to improved financial performance. Moreover, this paper contributes to the existing literature by examining complex models on the relationship between ambidextrous leadership and financial performance by integrating business models and environmental dynamism within Indonesia’s microfinance institutions.

Acknowledgment
Beasiswa Pendidikan Indonesia (BPI) supported this paper and its publication. We thank Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP) and Balai Pembiayaan Pendidikan Tinggi (BPPT) Pusat Layanan Pembiayaan Pendidikan (PUSLAPDIK) for funding this article with grant number 03426/BPPT/BPI.06/9/2023.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Research model
    • Table 1. Measurement evaluation
    • Table 2. Descriptive statistics and correlations between variables
    • Table 3. Moderation and mediation results (PROCESS: Model 14)
    • Conceptualization
      Syahrul Effendi, Idris Gautama So, Nugroho Juli Setiadi, Gatot Soepriyanto
    • Data curation
      Syahrul Effendi, Idris Gautama So, Nugroho Juli Setiadi, Gatot Soepriyanto
    • Formal Analysis
      Syahrul Effendi, Idris Gautama So, Nugroho Juli Setiadi, Gatot Soepriyanto
    • Funding acquisition
      Syahrul Effendi
    • Investigation
      Syahrul Effendi
    • Methodology
      Syahrul Effendi, Idris Gautama So, Nugroho Juli Setiadi, Gatot Soepriyanto
    • Project administration
      Syahrul Effendi
    • Resources
      Syahrul Effendi
    • Software
      Syahrul Effendi
    • Validation
      Syahrul Effendi, Idris Gautama So, Nugroho Juli Setiadi, Gatot Soepriyanto
    • Visualization
      Syahrul Effendi, Idris Gautama So, Nugroho Juli Setiadi, Gatot Soepriyanto
    • Writing – original draft
      Syahrul Effendi
    • Writing – review & editing
      Syahrul Effendi, Idris Gautama So, Nugroho Juli Setiadi, Gatot Soepriyanto
    • Supervision
      Idris Gautama So, Nugroho Juli Setiadi, Gatot Soepriyanto