Exploring technostress dynamics in consulting companies in Germany: A mixed-methods approach
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.46
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #2, pp. 586-599
- 133 Views
-
37 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Technostress (TS) has previously been addressed mainly from a broader organizational perspective, leaving more specific salient settings in the background. This paper bridges this gap by exploring TS dynamics in consulting companies in Germany, a setting that was previously little investigated but is highly TS-prone. This study uses an exploratory mixed-methods approach (MMR) with three components: 1) quantitative validation of the TS test-battery, 2) qualitative exploration of workplace TS through employee experiences, and 3) analysis of the relationship between TS experiences and demographics (age, gender, rank). Quantitative data representativeness is achieved through context-specific test-battery validation and a tailored questionnaire. 702 consulting company employees (based in Germany, aged 18-65) of a renowned management consulting firm participated (m = 417, f = 275). Qualitative data representativeness was ensured through in-depth interviews with 15 employees of different ages, genders, and ranks and company affiliations (Accenture, Boston Consulting Group, Deloitte, Ernst & Young, Roland Berger). Quantitative results indicated that female employees and those above 35 experienced higher levels of Techno-Complexity. Female employees experienced higher TS overall, reflected in their higher Techno-Overload, Techno-Invasion, and Techno-Complexity scores. This applied even to female employees who disagreed with the gender-difference tendency. Additional findings indicated that senior-ranking employees experienced more Techno-Overload and Techno-Invasion. Qualitative results highlighted three themes that further shape the psychological profile of TS in the investigated workplace: a) factors influencing TS, b) TS impact on workplace habits, and c) coping strategies. These findings emphasize that understanding the relationship between creators and demographics is crucial for mitigating consulting workplace TS.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M12, M54, O33
-
References48
-
Tables14
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Factor structure of technostress scale (TO, TI, TC)
-
- Table 1. Demographic distribution of survey participants (quantitative data)
- Table 2. Participant demographics for semi-structured interviews (qualitative data)
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics of technostress sub-scales
- Table 4. Results of exploratory factor analysis for technostress sub-scales
- Table 5. Correlation matrix of technostress items
- Table 6. Axial coding results – grouping of codes into categories
- Table 7. Major themes characteristic of the consulting domain
- Table 8. ANOVA test of TO, TI, and TC with respect to gender
- Table 9. Independent t-test scores comparing perceptions of higher technostress in women (TO, TI, TC scores): comparing women who think that women experience higher technostress than men and men who think that women experience higher technostress than men
- Table 10. Independent t-test scores comparing perceptions of higher technostress in women (TO, TI, TC scores): comparing women who do not think that women experience higher technostress than men and men who do not think that women experience higher techno
- Table 11. ANOVA test results of technostress indicators (TO, TI, TC) with respect to age
- Table 12. Stepwise regression analyses predicting TO split by gender
- Table 13. Stepwise regression analyses predicting TI split by gender
- Table 14. Stepwise regression analyses predicting TC split by gender
-
- Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858.
- Bäcklander, G., Rosengren, C., Lid Falkman, L., Stenfors, C., Seddigh, A., Osika, W., & Stenström, E. (2019). Navigating the activity based working environment–Relationships of self-leadership, autonomy and information richness with cognitive stress and performance. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(1), 1.
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demands-resources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. In Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers.
- Brod, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution reading. Addison-Wesley, 13, 242.
- Buyukozturk, S. (2010). Book of Data Analysis for Social Sciences. Ankara: Pegem Publication.
- Califf, C. B., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2020). The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare IT. Mis Quarterly, 44(2).
- Chandra, S., Shirish, A., & Srivastava, S. C. (2019). Does technostress inhibit employee innovation? Examining the linear and curvilinear influence of technostress creators. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44(1), 19.
- Chen, L., & Muthitacharoen, A. (2018). An empirical investigation of the consequences of technostress: Evidence from China. In Social Issues in the Workplace: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 667-690). IGI Global.
- Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A first course in factor analysis. Psychology Press.
- Davis, G. B. (2002). Anytime/anyplace computing and the future of knowledge work. Communications of the ACM, 45(12), 67-73.
- Dormann, C., & Zapf, D. (2002). Social stressors at work, irritation, and depressive symptoms: Accounting for unmeasured third variables in a multi-wave study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75(1), 33-58.
- Eggli, A., Pereira, D., & Elfering, A. (2022). An Analysis of Social Stressors with Clients, Emotional Labor Strategies, and Disengagement: A Diary Study on Social Work. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(1).
- Epstein, E. G., Haizlip, J., Liaschenko, J., Zhao, D., Bennett, R., & Marshall, M. F. (2020). Moral distress, mattering, and secondary traumatic stress in provider burnout: A call for moral community. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 31(2), 146-157.
- Eurofund. (2022). Working conditions in the time of COVID-19: Implications for the future (European Working Conditions Telephone Survey 2021 series). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Fischer, T., & Riedl, R. (2020). Technostress measurement in the field: A case report. In Information Systems and Neuroscience: NeuroIS Retreat 2020 (pp. 71-78). Springer International Publishing.
- Gaudioso, F., Turel, O., & Galimberti, C., (2017). The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating techno-stressors into adverse job outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 189-196.
- Gerdiken, E., Reinwald, M., & Kunze, F. (2021). Outcomes of technostress at work: A meta-analysis. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2021, No. 1, p. 11807). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
- Giorgi, G., Arcangeli, G., Ariza-Montes, A., Rapisarda, V., & Mucci, N. (2019). Work-related stress in the Italian banking population and its association with recovery experience. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 32(2), 255-265.
- González-López, Ó. R., Buenadicha-Mateos, M., & Sánchez-Hernández, M. I. (2021). Overwhelmed by technostress? Sensitive archetypes and effects in times of forced digitalization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(08), 4216.
- Grimm, J. L., Kamath, J. R., Jasperson, J. C., & Larsen, D. A. (2020). Enabling a high-performing and sustainable shared service: The journey of a management engineering and consulting group. Management in Healthcare, 4(3), 231-247.
- Gustavsson, M. E., Juth, N., von Schreeb, J., & Arnberg, F. K. (2023). Moral Stress among Swedish Health Care Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1).
- Hauk, N., Göritz, A. S., & Krumm, S. (2019). The mediating role of coping behavior on the age-technostress relationship: A longitudinal multilevel mediation model. PloSone, 14(3).
- Hodgkinson, G. P., & Healey, M. P. (2008). Cognition in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 387-417.
- Hsiao, K. L. (2017). Compulsive mobile application usage and technostress: the role of personality traits. Online Information Review, 41(2), 272-295.
- Karimikia, H., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2021). Negative outcomes of ICT use at work: meta-analytic evidence and the role of job autonomy. Internet Research, 31(1), 159-190.
- Khedhaouria, A., & Cucchi, A. (2019). Technostress creators, personality traits, and job burnout: A fuzzy-set configurational analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101, 349-361.
- Kotek, M., & Vranjes, I. (2022). Exploring the antecedents of technostress at work: a meta-analysis. Research Square.
- Krishnan, S. (2017). Personality and espoused cultural differences in technostress creators. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 154-167.
- La Torre, G., Esposito, A., Sciarra, I., & Chiappetta, M. (2019). Definition, symptoms and risk of techno-stress: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 92, 13-35.
- Leitner I., & Rašticová, M. (2023). Technostress and its Management in the 21st Century Workplace: Implications for Consulting Workforce. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 27(1).
- Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24(5), 1337-1357.
- Meurs, J. A., & Perrewé, P. L. (2011). Cognitive activation theory of stress: An integrative theoretical approach to work stress. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1043-1068.
- Ogbonnaya, C., Daniels, K., Connolly, S., & van Veldhoven, M. (2017). Integrated and isolated impact of high-performance work practices on employee health and well-being: A comparative study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(1), 98.
- Pfaffinger, K. F., Reif, J. A., & Spieß, E. (2022). When and why telepressure and technostress creators impair employee well-being. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(2), 958-973.
- Pflügner, K., Baumann, A., & Maier, C. (2021). Managerial technostress: A qualitative study on causes and consequences. In Proceedings of the 2021 on Computers and People Research Conference (pp. 63-70).
- Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433.
- Rohwer, E., Flöther, J. C., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2022). Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology – A scoping review on preventing and coping with work-related technostress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3625.
- Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., & Nogareda, C. (2007). Technostress: Concept, measurement, and Prevention. Notatechia de Prevencion. 730. Madrid: INSHT.
- Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Ventura, M. (2014). Technostress: The dark side of technologies. In The impact of ICT on quality of working life (pp. 87-103).
- Stana, R., & Nicolajsen, H. W. (2021). Sociological mechanisms behind ICT-related technostress in the workplace. In Information Technology in Organisations and Societies: Multidisciplinary Perspectives from AI to Technostress (pp. 85-110). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328.
- Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2011). Crossing to the dark side: Examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113-120.
- Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. F. (2019). The technostress trifecta – techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6-42.
- Valta, M., Pflügner, K., & Maier, C. (2021). Guiding companies to reduce technostress: A mixed-methods study deriving practice-oriented recommendations (Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences).
- Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., & Bala, H. (2013). Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 21-54.
- Wajcman, J. (2020). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. University of Chicago Press.
- Wang, B., Liu, Y., & Parker, S. K. (2020). How does the use of information communication technology affect individuals? A work design perspective. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 695-725.
- Wang, X., Tan, S. C., & Li, L. (2020). Technostress in university students’ technology-enhanced learning: An investigation from multidimensional person-environment misfit. Computers in Human Behavior, 105.