The impact of employee engagement and innovation performance on business success in manufacturing and service enterprises in Albania and Kosovo
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.09
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 94-102
- Cited by
- 428 Views
-
113 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to investigate the interplay between employee engagement and innovation performance in shaping the success of manufacturing and service enterprises in Albania and Kosovo. The data collection involved the distribution of questionnaires to entrepreneurs, managers, and employees of the enterprises, with direct interviews conducted in some cases. The data collection period spanned from the end of 2022 to the beginning of 2023. SPSS was employed to create the database and analyze the collected data. The study encompasses 190 companies operating in the services and production sectors, with 100 located in Albania and 90 in Kosovo. The selection of these sectors is based on their significant contribution to the region’s economic landscape. Of the total enterprises, 105 (55%) are manufacturing enterprises, and 85 (45%) are service enterprises.
The findings reveal a robust and positive correlation between employee engagement, innovation performance, and business success. Employee engagement (r = 0.458**) and innovation performance (r = 0.396**) exhibit significant correlations (p < 0.01), with both factors demonstrating statistical significance (p = 0.000). The multivariate regression analysis confirms the positive influence of both employee engagement and innovation performance on business success, supported by a significance of ANOVA analysis (p = .000). This study contributes to the understanding of the specific dynamics of employee engagement and innovation performance in the context of manufacturing and service enterprises in Albania and Kosovo. It offers valuable insights for managers and entrepreneurs seeking to enhance the success of their organizations.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E24, O31, L20, D83, M20
-
References31
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Assessment of multicollinearity
- Table 2. Pearson correlation analysis results
- Table 3. Regressions
- Table 4. ANOVA analysis
-
- Albrecht, S. L. (2010). Handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
- Bakker, A. B., & Bal, P. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among beginning teachers. Journal of Occupational and Business Psychology, 83(1), 189-206.
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209-223.
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285.
- Christensen, C. M. (2016). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
- De Jong, J., & Den Hart, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
- Dyer, J., Christensen, C. M., & Gregersen, H. B. (2011). The innovator’s DNA : mastering the five skills of disruptive innovators. Harvard Business Press.
- Gallup. (2017). State of the global workplace: Employee engagement insights for business leaders worldwide. Gallup, Inc.
- Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2020). Employee and collective voice engagement: being psychologically present when speaking up at work. In A. Wilkinson, J. Donaghey, T. Dundon, & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Employee Voice (pp. 397-417).
- Edward Elgar Publishing. Guest, D. E. (2017). Employee engagement: A practical introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Business Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
- Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495-513.
- Hakanen, J. J., Schaufeli, W. B., & Ahola, K. (2008). The job demands-resources model: A three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement. Work & Stress, 22(3), 224-241.
- Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
- Hirst, G., & Gold, J. (2016). Leadership development for interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Springer.
- Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.
- Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
- Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Innovation for productivity in the American corporation. Simon & Schuster.
- Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Business Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.
- Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2006). Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 63-73.
- O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality and Quantity, 41, 673-690.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Business citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.
- Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Business Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
- Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
- Shuck, B., & Wollard, K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89-110.
- Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2018). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and business change. John Wiley & Sons.
- Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. (2008). Expanding the scope and impact of organizational creativity research. In Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 347-368).