Initiatives, public trust, and citizen engagement during crises: A comparative analysis across Baltic states
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.15
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #4, pp. 189-201
- Cited by
- 272 Views
-
64 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this study is to investigate the interplay between government initiatives, public trust in government, and citizen engagement within the context of two distinct crisis scenarios: a global health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and an international security crisis caused by Russian aggression against Ukraine. A two-stage biennial survey methodology is used to collect quantitative data. In the first phase, which took place in the context of a global health crisis, an omnibus survey was conducted, involving a randomly selected sample of 3,175 respondents from three Baltic countries: Estonia (n = 1002), Latvia (n = 1017), and Lithuania (n = 1006). In the second stage, which took place in the context of an international security crisis, a random sample was carried out of 2026 respondents from two Baltic countries: Estonia (n = 1002) and Lithuania (n = 1024). The analysis examined causal relationships in political, rational, and social trust.
The findings reveal that the relationship between trust in the government and government initiatives that foster political, rational, or emotional trust is stronger during international security crises than during health crises. This means that citizens perceive government behavior as more credible in the context of external security threats. Research on the interaction between government behavior and citizen participation is more nuanced than on public trust. In general, government initiatives have a greater impact on citizen participation than public trust in both crises. This highlights the positive impact of government initiatives in cooperation with the population.
Acknowledgment
The study is financed from the funds of the study-supporting project “Research on the Management of Security and Defense Institutions of Small States” (General Jonas Žemaitis Lithuanian Military Academy, 2020-12-17, No. V-828).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H11, H12
-
References26
-
Tables5
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research model
-
- Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the Baltic countries
- Table 2. Optimal sample size for the study
- Table 3. Deviations in trust means across socio-demographic characteristics in 2021 and 2022
- Table 4. Variables reliability
- Table 5. Correlation matrix
-
- Auf der Heide, E. (1989). Disaster response: Principles of preparation and coordination. St. Louis: Mosby.
- Blind, P. K. (2007). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. UNDESA.
- Brezzi, M., González, S., Nguyen, D., & Prats, M. (2021). An updated OECD framework on drivers of trust in public institutions to meet current and future challenges (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 48). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Bunea, A., & Nørbech, I. (2023). Preserving the old or building the new? Reputation-building through strategic talk and engagement with stakeholder inputs by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(9), 1762-1792.
- Chua, E. L., Chiu, J. L., & Chiu, C. L. (2020). Factors influencing trust and behavioral intention to use Airbnb service innovation in three ASEAN countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 175-188.
- Clark, J. R., & Lee, D. R. (2001). The optimal trust in government. Eastern Economic Journal, 27(1), 19-34.
- Díaz, P., Aedo, I., & Herranz, S. (2014). Understanding citizen participation in crisis and disasters: The point of view of governmental agencies. Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 395-397).
- Ejrnæs, A., & Harrebye, S. (2022). How do crises paralyze and activate? The impact of dissatisfaction on European patterns of participation. European Politics and Society, 23(5), 597-616.
- Fishkin, J. S. (2011). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford Academic.
- Giedraitytė, V., Smaliukienė, R., & Vedlūga, T. (2022). The Impact of citizen participation on public sentiments during crises: Comparative study of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Sustainability, 14(24), 16981.
- Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499-510.
- Hardin, R. (1998). Trust in government. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 9-28). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Knodt, M., Stöckl, A., Steinke, F., Pietsch, M., Hornung, G., & Stroscher, J. P. (2023). Power blackout: Citizens’ contribution to strengthen urban resilience. Energy Policy, 174, 113433.
- Kumagai, S., & Iorio, F. (2020). Building trust in government through citizen engagement. Washington: World Bank Group.
- Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 77-102). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Linnell, M. (2014). Citizen response in crisis: Individual and collective efforts to enhance community resilience. Human Technology, 10(2), 68-94.
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Nyseth, T., Ringholm, T. M., & Agger, A. (2019). Innovative forms of citizen participation at the fringe of the formal planning system. Urban Plan, 4(1), 7-18.
- OECD. (2022). Building trust to reinforce democracy: Main findings from the 2021 OECD Survey on drivers of trust in public institutions. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2023a). Trust in government (indicator).
- OECD. (2023b). Civic engagement.
- Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Smith, R., Stephens, K., Robertson, B., Li, J., & Murthy, D. (2018). Social media in citizen-led disaster response: Rescuer roles, coordination challenges, and untapped potential. Proceedings of the 15th ISCRAM Conference (pp. 639-648). Rochester, NY, USA.
- Soares da Silva, D., Horlings, L., & Figueiredo, E. (2018). Citizen initiatives in the post-welfare state. Social Sciences, 7(12), 252.
- Whittaker, J., McLennan, B., & Handmer, J. (2015). A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, 358-368.
- World Bank Group. (2020). Global Governance Program.