Effect of Ukraine’s public debt management on its macroeconomic development: VAR modeling
-
Author(s)Fedir ZhuravkaLink to Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/fedir-zhuravka-2955b480/Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8368-5743Link to Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?user=QsNtRGUAAAAJ&hl=ru&oi=sra
,
Mila RazinkovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1590-7428
,
Olena PlakhotnikLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9717-2877
,
Tetiana GrynkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7882-4523
,
Natalia NebabaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1264-106X
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.37
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #4, pp. 483-501
- Cited by
- 140 Views
-
44 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
One of the tools of economic policy of any country is efficient public debt management, which influences and determines the dynamics of key macroeconomic indicators. The study aims to assess how public debt management affects Ukraine’s macroeconomic development. The analyzed period includes data of 2015–2021. Econometric modeling is used to establish the existence of causal relationships between the dynamics of public debt and changes in key macroeconomic indicators using the Granger causality test and VAR (Vector Autoregression) model. The obtained results demonstrate that during the study period, the strongest links existed between the public debt and GDP, debt servicing and Ukraine’s total state budget expenditures, public debt and consumer price index, real effective exchange rate index of the hryvnia to the US dollar, and political stability index. At the same time, the calculations proved that public debt does not have a significant impact on foreign direct investment and the level of imports of goods and services. The proposed model allows for forecasts for future periods and can be used in developing public debt management policy.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H60, H63, H69
-
References41
-
Tables8
-
Figures4
-
- Figure B1. Dynamics of Ukraine’s macroeconomic indicators that are interdependent with the public debt (2015–2021)
- Figure D1. Comparison of real data with model values from the VAR model
- Figure F1. Comparison of actual data with model values of the VAR model
- Figure G1. Projections of chosen macroeconomic indicators based on the VAR model for 2021–2023
-
- Table 1. Significance of Granger causality test statistics for identifying causal relationships between specific macroeconomic indicators and the general government debt to GDP ratio in Ukraine during the period 2015–2021
- Table 2. The p-value for the statistics of the Granger causality test examining causal relationships between specific macroeconomic indicators and the ratio of total government debt to GDP of Ukraine during the period 2015–2021
- Table 3. Results of the augmented Dickey-Fuller test for chosen macroeconomic indicators from 2015 to 2021
- Table 4. Search results for the optimal order of the VAR model for selected macroeconomic indicators over 2015–2021
- Table 5. Forecasting the values of chosen macroeconomic indicators by employing the VAR model from 2021 to 2023
- Table A1. Dynamics of Ukraine’s macroeconomic indicators selected to identify interdependent relationships with public debt (quarterly values for 2015–2021)
- Table C1. Results of VAR modeling for selected macroeconomic indicators for the period 2015–2021
- Table E1. Results of VAR modeling for selected macroeconomic indicators during 2015–2021
-
- Aiyedogbon, J. O., Zhuravka, F., Korneyev, M., Banchuk-Petrosova, O., & Kravchenko, O. (2022). Impact of public debt profile on economic growth: Evidence from Nigeria. Public and Municipal Finance, 11(1), 10-19.
- Arnone, M., & Presbitero, A. F. (2006). External debt sustainability and domestic debt in heavily indebted poor countries (MPRA Paper 1396). University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Ayadi, F., & Ayadi, O. F. (2008). The impact of external debt on economic growth: A comparative study of Nigeria and South Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 10(3), 234-264.
- Azam Khan, M. (2013). The role of external debt in economic growth of Indonesia – A blessing or burden? World Applied Sciences Journal, 25(8), 1150-1157.
- Baldacci, E., Gupta, S., & Mati, A. (2011). Political and fiscal risk determinants of sovereign spreads in emerging markets. Review of Development Economics, 15(2), 251-263.
- Benli, M. (2020). External debt burden – Economic growth nexus in Turkey. Social Science Research Journal, 9(1), 107-116.
- Cavalcanti, M., Vereda, L., Doctors, R. de B., Lima, F., & Maynard, L. (2018). The macroeconomic effects of monetary policy shocks under fiscal rules constrained by public debt sustainability. Economic Modelling, 71, 184-201.
- Cecchetti, S. G., Mohanty, M. S., & Zampolli, F. (2011). The real effects of debt (BIS Working Papers No. 352).
- Chandia, K., Riaz, S., Javid, A., Iqbal, M., Azam, M., & Gul, I. (2019). Assessment of public and external debt sustainability using debt dynamics equation approach: A comparative study of Pakistan and India. Millennial Asia, 10(1), 25-55.
- Clements, B., Bhattacharya, R., & Nguyen, T. Q. (2003). External debt, public investment, and growth in low-income countries. IMF Working Papers, 2003(249), 1-27.
- Cutrini, Е., & Galeazzi, G. (2012). Can emerging economies decouple from the US business cycle? (Working Papers 41-2012). Department of Studies on Economic Development (DiSSE), Macerata University.
- Devereux, M., & Yu, C. (2020). International financial integration and crisis contagion. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(3), 1174-1212.
- Gómez-Puig, M., & Sosvilla-Rivero, S. (2015). The causal relationship between debt and growth in EMU countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(6), 352-367.
- Gontareva, I., Litvinov, O., Hrebennyk, N., Nebaba, N., Litvinova, V., & Chimshir, A. (2022). Improvement of the innovative ecosystem at universities. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(13(115)), 59-68.
- Gourinchas, P.-O., & Rey, H. (2014). External adjustment, global imbalances, valuation effects. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of International Economics, 4 (pp. 585-645). Elsevier.
- Gövdeli, T. (2019). External debt and economic growth in Turkey: An empirical analysis. Sosyoekonomi, 27(40), 119-130.
- Grynko, T., & Gviniashvili, T. (2015). Organizational changes at the enterprise within the context of its innovative development. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(2), 51-54.
- Korneyev, M., Berezhniuk, I., Dzhyndzhoian, V., Kubakh, T., & Horb, K. (2022). Business marketing activities in Ukraine during wartime. Innovative Marketing, 18(3), 48-58.
- Kumhof, M., & Yakadina, I. (2017). Government debt bias. IMF Economic Review, 65, 675-703.
- Makedon, V., & Korneyev, M. (2014). Improving methodology of estimating value of financial sector entities dealing in mergers and acquisitions. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11(1), 44-55.
- Malik, S., Hayat, M. K., & Hayat, M. U. (2010). External debt and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 44, 88-97.
- Manasseh, C. O., Abada, F. C., Okiche, E. L., Okanya, O., Nwakoby, I. C., Offu, P., Ogbuagu, A. R., Okafor, C. O., Obidike, P. C., & Nwonye, N. G. (2022). External debt and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does governance matter? PLoS ONE, 17(3), e0264082.
- Mendoza, E. G., Quadrini, V., & Ríos-Rull, J.-V. (2009). Financial integration, financial development, and global imbalances. Journal of Political Economy, 117(2), 371-416.
- Mohd Daud, S. N., & Podivinsky, J. M. (2012). Revisiting the role of external debt in economic growth of developing countries. Journal of Business Economics & Management, 13(5).
- Naumenkova, S., Mishchenko, V., Chugunov, I., & Mishchenko, S. (2023). Debt-for-nature or climate swaps in public finance management. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 698-713.
- Ngangnchi, F. H., & Joefendeh, R. (2021). External debt, public investment and economic growth in Cameroon. International Journal of Finance Research, 2(4), 260-273.
- Oyinlola, M. A., Adedeji, A. A., & Oladipupo, R. O. (2020). External debt, investment and economic performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. Trends in Agricultural Economics, 13(1), 1-10.
- Petrushenko, Y., Korneyev, M., Nebaba, N., Banchuk-Petrosova, O., & Bohorodytska, A. (2022). Assessment of the external debt impact on a country’s economic development indicators: Evidence from Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 19(1), 360-369.
- Razinkova, M., Nebaba, N., Korneyev, M., Yakovenko, T., & Bohorodytska, A. (2023a). Assessment of Ukraine’s external debt burden under geopolitical instability. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(2), 67-81.
- Razinkova, М., Zhuravka, F., Nebaba, N., Botvinov, R., & Voytov, S. (2023b). External public debt management during the wartime: Case of Ukraine. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(4), 26-35.
- Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This time is different: Eight centuries of financial folly. Princeton University Press.
- Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American Economic Review, 100(2), 573-578.
- Ruiz-Arranz, M., Cordella, T., & Ricci, L. (2005). Debt overhang or debt irrelevance? Revisiting the debt growth link. IMF Working Papers, 2005(223).
- Shittu, W. O., Ismail, N. A., Abdul Latiff, A. R., & Musibau, H. (2020). Modelling external debt-growth nexus: How relevant is governance? Journal of Financial Crime, 27(4), 1323-1340.
- Shkolnyk, I., & Koilo, V. (2018). The relationship between external debt and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Ukraine and other emerging economies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(1), 387-400.
- Son, N. N. (2023). Public debt management and economic growth: A threshold regression approach. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(1), 62-72.
- Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393-410.
- Turan, T., & Yanıkkaya, H. (2021). External debt, growth and investment for developing countries: Some evidence for the debt overhang hypothesis. Portuguese Economic Journal, 20, 319-341.
- Waldenström, D., Mauro, P., Sussman, N., & Yafeh, Y. (2007). Emerging markets and financial globalization: Sovereign bond spreads in 1870–1913 and today. Financial History Review, 14(2), 289-290.
- Zhuravka, F., Filatova, H., & Aiyedogbon, J. O. (2019a). Government debt forecasting based on the Arima model. Public and Municipal Finance, 8(1), 120-127.
- Zhuravka, F., Makarenko, M., Osetskyi, V., Podmarov, O., & Chentsov, V. (2019b). Impact of politically generated shocks on monetary performance: A cross-country comparison. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(3), 99-112.
-
Impact on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia’s economic growth
Rabiul Islam ,
Ahmad Bashawir Abdul Ghani ,
Irwanshah Zainal Abidin ,
Jeya Malar Rayaiappan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.05
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 55-62 Views: 11273 Downloads: 5175 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPoverty and income inequality are extreme issues that still exist in Malaysia. Any rise in poverty and income inequality definitely affect economic growth. There are many great efforts taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and to reduce the gap of income inequality which occurs since 1970’s. The incidence of poverty and income inequality is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. This paper is mainly to study the level of poverty and income inequality in Malaysia together with government intervention to develop Malaysia’s economic growth. The research is focused among the working people at Ipoh, Perak. In this paper, questionnaire forms are being distributed to get information regarding the issue of poverty and income inequality. It also looks into the strategies taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and income inequality. Few recommendations are given in terms of education policy, financial aid and assistance from government and non-government organization (NGO) to upgrade the standard and quality of living among the poor and lower-income group of people.
-
Impact of inflation on economic growth: evidence from Nigeria
Anthony Olugbenga Adaramola ,
Oluwabunmi Dada
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 1-13 Views: 8016 Downloads: 4881 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn an attempt to examine the influence of inflation on the growth prospects of the Nigerian economy, the study employs the autoregressive distributed lag on the selected variables, i.e. real gross domestic product (GDP), inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate, degree of economy`s openness, money supply, and government consumption expenditures for the period 1980–2018. The study findings indicate that inflation and real exchange rate exert a significant negative impact on economic growth, while interest rate and money supply indicate a positive and significant impact on economic growth. Other variables in the model depict no influence on the economic growth of Nigeria. The causality result shows the unidirectional relationships between interest rate, exchange rate, government consumption expenditures and gross domestic product. However, inflation and the degree of openness show no causal relationship with gross domestic product. As a result, the study recommends that a more pragmatic effort is needed by the monetary authorities to target the inflation vigorously to prevent its adverse effect by ensuring a tolerable rate that would stimulate the economic growth of Nigeria.
-
Formalization of the impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources on economic growth of countries in Central and Eastern Europe
Serhiy Kozmenko ,
Maxim Korneyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.06
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 48-58 Views: 6208 Downloads: 1333 TO CITEThe article deals with the impact of financialization on economic growth in countries of Central and Eastern Europe. It determinesthe impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization on economic growth of these countries. It proves that the implementation of measures aimed at increasing the openness of the economy and maintaining solvent demand have a positive impact on economic growth of the surveyed countries in the long run. It also proves the importance of developing a set of measures of strategic nature regulating imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization.
