In-group and out-group behavior in Indian multinational corporations: An analysis of its implications on organizational performance
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.15
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #3, pp. 189-205
- 390 Views
-
148 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this study is to investigate in-group and out-group dynamics within multinational corporations in India and their influence on organizational performance. The paper uses concurrent triangulation. Primary data were gathered via a purposive sample of 500 employees across various demographic backgrounds, ensuring diversity. Respondents participated in an online survey and a few in-depth interviews, administered in-person or online, capturing their experiences of group dynamics. Survey data were analyzed using R, SPSS, and SAS, while thematic analysis was applied to in-depth interview transcripts using NVivo software. The study also employed descriptive statistics, ANOVA, MANOVA for the survey and thematic analysis for interviews, revealing the depth and complexity of in-group favoritism. In-group members have reported significantly higher levels of communication, trust, cooperation, conflict management, and innovation, indicating the impact of group dynamics on organizational performance. The outcome of the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) demonstrates a substantial impact of in-group/out-group categorization on the amalgamated dependent variables (evidenced by a Wilks’ Lambda value of 0.68, F (5,94) = 4.17, p < .001). This suggests a noteworthy influence of in-group/out-group affinities on overall team efficacy. The insights offer concrete strategies to enhance inclusivity amid diversity within multinational corporations, thereby mitigating group bias and promoting organizational performance. This study not only expands the understanding of group dynamics in Indian multinational corporations but also offers valuable guidance for managerial practices.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M12, M14, M16, J24, O15
-
References50
-
Tables5
-
Figures6
-
- Figure 1. Representation of descriptive data
- Figure 2. Visualization of MANOVA results
- Figure 3. Visualization of the univariate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) for the dependent variables
- Figure 4. Results of MANOVA illustrating the variations between in-group and out-group members on composite dependent variables
- Figure 5. Pie chart: SEM results
- Figure 6. Count of category by the result
-
- Table 1. Summary of descriptive statistics
- Table 2. MANOVA results for the study variables
- Table 3. Outcomes of the univariate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) for the dependent variables
- Table 4. Representation of the MANOVA results illustrating the variations between in-group and out-group members on composite dependent variables
- Table 5. Outcomes of the hypotheses testing
-
- Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
- Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., Zanutto, E. L., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2009). Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organization Science, 20(1), 35-50.
- Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Brislin, R. (1992). The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16(4), 413-436.
- Bıçakcıoğlu-Peynirci, N. (2023). Internationalization of emerging market multinational enterprises: A systematic literature review and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 164, 114002.
- Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: In-group love and out-group hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444.
- Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 279-307.
- Campion, M. A., & Posthuma, R. A. (2007). Workplace stereotypes and legal defensibility. PsycEXTRA Dataset.
- Chen, M. F., & Tjosvold, D. (2007). Guanxi and leader member relationships between American managers and Chinese employees: Open-minded dialogue as mediator. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24, 171-189.
- Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 111-133.
- Dias, D., Zhu, C. J., & Samaratunge, R. (2017). Examining the role of cultural exposure in improving intercultural competence: Implications for HRM practices in multicultural organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(11), 1359-1378.
- Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229-273.
- Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. (2014). Institutions, resources, and internationalization of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 12-20.
- Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication. McGraw-Hill Humanities, Social Sciences & World Languages.
- Homan, A. C., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1189-1199.
- Horwitz, F. M., Cooke, F. L., & Kamoche, K. N. (2021). Human resource management in emerging markets. In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Approaches to Human Resource Management (pp. 114-133). Oxford University Press.
- Jackson, S. E., & Ruderman, M. (Eds.). (1995). Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. American Psychologist Association.
- Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2010). The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 24-42.
- Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S. S., & Szulanski, G. (2008). The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17(6), 465-495.
- Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1993). Procedural justice theory and the multinational corporation. In Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation (pp. 237-255). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
- Kinkhabwala, B. A. (2019, June 6). Strategies to deal Cross Cultural differences by MNCs. Research Gate.
- Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D., & Thomas, D. (2003). The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management, 42(1), 3-21.
- Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124.
- Kumar, A., Kapoor, S., & Gupta, S. K. (2022). Do the qualities of transformational leadership influence employees’ job engagement? A survey of the Indian power sector. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(4), 614-625.
- Kumar, V., Mishra, P., Yadav, S. B., & Gupta, S. K. (2023). The Role of power dynamics and social status in Indian MNCs in shaping In-Group and Out-group behaviour and its impact on perceived individual performance outcomes. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 13(1).
- Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2005). Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 323-333.
- Maiorescu, R., & Wrigley, B. (2016). Diversity in multinational corporations. Routledge.
- Marton, F., Tsui, A. B. M., Chik, P. P. M., Ko, P. Y., & Lo, M. L. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Routledge.
- May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37.
- Mishra, P., Shukla, B., & Sujatha, R. (2021). Human resource management for organisational change: Theoretical formulations. Routledge.
- Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological Review, 93(1), 23-32.
- Nori, N. R., & Gupta, S. K. (2021). The role of industrial ecology in maximizing the value of the organization: A case study of mineral water industry organizations of Duhok City, Iraq. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 12(3), 34-53.
- O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 21-37.
- Panicker, V. S., Upadhyayula, R. S., & Sivakumar, S. (2022). Internationalization of hybrid state-owned enterprises from emerging markets: Institutional investors as enablers. Journal of Business Research, 151, 409-422.
- Paul, J., & Gupta, P. (2014). Process and intensity of internationalization of IT firms – Evidence from India. International Business Review, 23(3), 594-603.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
- Polón, M. (2017, January 1). Theseus: Impact of cross-cultural training on expatriate performance. Theseus.
- Prasad, L., Nagar, N., Rajsekar, D., Uppal, A. G., Mishra, P., Gupta, S. K., Renu, & Kornieva, N. (2023). Evaluation of the exercise of the performance assessment system. In B. Alareeni, A. Hamdan, R. Khamis, & R. E. Khoury (Eds.), Digitalisation: Opportunities and Challenges for Business (pp. 547-559). Cham: Springer.
- Ragins, B. R., & Kram, K. E. (2007). The landscape of mentoring relationships. Jossey-Bass.
- Rana, R., Kapoor, S., & Gupta, S. K. (2021). Impact of HR practices on corporate image building in the Indian IT sector. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(2), 528-535.
- Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594.
- Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Houghton Mifflin.
- Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robbers cave experiment. University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
- Sinha, H., Mishra, P., Lakhnpal, P., & Gupta, S. K. (2022). Human resource practice types being followed in Indian entrepreneurial organizations with focus on succession planning process. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(2), 53-59.
- Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. (2009). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 690-709.
- Taher, M. A., Gomes, K., & Chowdhury, Y. (2018). Exploring the relationship between conflict management style and organizational performance: An empirical study in the organizations of Bangladesh. 24th International Conference on Advances in Management.
- Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader, 56(65).
- Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Uygun, S. V., & Gupta, S. K. (2020). Leadership and accountability for social development: Intellectual leadership and rectors. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 21(2), 171-180.
- West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680-693.
- Yidong, T., & Xinxin, L. (2012). How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 441-455.