Influence of general government expenditure on the development of sports entrepreneurship: The case of some OECD countries
-
Author(s)Vugar NazarovLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-7184
,
Nailya KalantarlyLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8175-774X
,
Jamal HajiyevLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-3010
,
Gulnar HasanovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1411-0510
,
Albina HashimovaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9866-5865
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.33
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #2, pp. 336-346
- 664 Views
-
205 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The low level of the nation’s health and physical activity highlights the need to find additional mechanisms for the development of the sports sphere, one of which is to increase its financing. This paper aims to investigate how an increase in general government expenditure on recreation and sports affects sports entrepreneurship (turnover or gross premium written in the sports industry; value added at factor cost of sports enterprises; sports industry market size) and the share of the population involved in sports (as an indicator characterizing the development of sports). The study used the panel unit root test and fixed and random effects models. Modeling proved that the increase in general government expenditure on recreation and sports by 1% largely determines the increase in value added at factor cost of sports enterprises (by 5.48%). A significantly less effect is for turnover or gross premium written in the sports industry (by 0.85%), and the smallest is for the sports industry market size (by 0.4%). A 1% increase in general government expenditure on recreation and sport has the greatest impact in the Czech Republic (by 2.37%) and Slovakia (by 2.44%) and the least – in Australia (by 0.4%). The share of the population involved in sports is almost independent of general government expenditure on recreation and sports in all 10 OECD countries.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L67, L83, L26, D25
-
References47
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Panel unit root test for indicators of the development of sports entrepreneurship
- Table 2. Hausman test for indicators of development of sports entrepreneurship
- Table 3. Random effects model for indicators of development of sports entrepreneurship
-
- Amara, M. (2020, May 22). Investment in sports sector: Opportunities and challenges. LinkedIn.
- Badenhausen, K. (2018, February 7). NBA team values 2018: Every club now worth at least USD 1 billion. Forbes.
- Čingienė, V. (2020). The effect of Lithuanian household income on the choice of non-formal education of children through sports and related costs. Innovative Marketing, 16(1), 11-18.
- Dallmeyer, S., Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2018). The relationship between sport-related government spending and sport and exercise participation: The role of funding size, period, and consistency. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 56(4-5), 237-247.
- Darchia, S. (2022). Business – process for investment activity. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(1), 46-49.
- Dart, J. (2014). New media, professional sport and political economy. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 38(6), 528-547.
- Dorofieieva, T. (2022). Comparative analysis of sports development and management between rural communities in Ukraine and Europe. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 10(3), 476-483.
- Dotsenko, T., & Kolomiiets, S. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of research of the behavioral and social dimension of the public health system of the world. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(3), 97-106.
- Eskiler, E., Altunisik, R., & Sarikaya, N. (2021). The relationship between brand associations and fan behaviours for football teams. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 32-42.
- Forbes Staff. (2018, September 20). Forbes releases 21st annual NFL team valuations. Forbes.
- Forbes. (2018, June 12). The world’s most valuable soccer teams 2018.
- Giebe, C., Löffler, L., & Schneider, S. (2020). “Take a knee” protests in professional sports: An empirical study about the influence on customer loyalty to Nike in Germany. Business Ethics and Leadership, 4(1), 92-105.
- Ginesta, X., & De San Eugenio, J. (2014). The use of football as a country branding strategy. Case study: Qatar and the Catalan sports press. Communication & Sport, 2(3), 225-241.
- Greco, F., & Matta, L. (2021). Entangled entrepreneurial competitiveness advantage: An opinion paper. Business Ethics and Leadership, 5(3), 42-46.
- Hardy, S. (1986). Entrepreneurs, organizations, and the sport marketplace: Subjects in search of historians. Journal of Sport History, 13(1), 14-33.
- Howard, D. R. (2018). Financing sport (4thed.). Morgantown, WV: FiT Publishing.
- Imbroda-Ortiz, J., Castillo-Rodríguez, A., &Chinchilla-Minguet, J. L. (2015). Sports management, leadership in the organization. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Management, 2(2), a5.
- Jedel, J. (2019). The funding of professional sports entities by state-owned companies and private institutions. The necessity or philanthropy? Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 11(5), 41-53.
- Kanaan-Jebna, J. M. A., Alabdullah, T. T. Y., Ahmed, E. R., & Ayyasamy, R. K. (2022). Firm performance and the impact of entrepreneurial education and entrepreneurial competencies. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(2), 68-77.
- Kaya, H. (2022). Regulations and the characteristics of entrepreneurs. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(3), 80-96.
- Koibichuk, V., Drozd, S., & Somogyi, A. (2022). Effectiveness of the sports management system in Europe: High achievements, public funding and a healthy lifestyle. Economics & Sociology, 15(4), 264-285.
- Lahouirich M. W., El Amri, A., Oulfarsi S., Sahib Eddine, A., El Bayed Sakalli H., & Boutti, R. (2022). From financial performance to sustainable development: A great evolution and an endless debate. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(1), 68-79.
- Le, T. T., Tran, H. L., Nguyen, D. H., Le, Q. D., Nguyen, V. H., & Do, H. L. (2022). The influence of sports activities on workplace productivity in Vietnam: The mediating role of stress management and work-life balance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 46(6), 740-752.
- Lee, S.,& No, S. (2022). China’s overseas financial direct investment (ODI) in European football clubs: Revisiting ODI in the context of industry. Journal of Global Sport Management,7(3), 391-405.
- Legg, D., & Gough, V. (2012). Calgary Flames: A case study in an entrepreneurial sport franchise. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 4(1), 32-41.
- Litvishko, O. V., Vysotskaya, T. P., Bodrov, I. M., Nosov, S. M., & Buyanova, T. V. (2019). Ways to improve efficiency of professional sports financing mechanisms. Theory and Practice of Physical Culture, 9, 34-34.
- Lyeonov, S., Bilan, S., Yarovenko, H., Ostasz, G., & Kolotilina, O. (2021). Country’s health profile: Social, economic, behavioral and healthcare determinants. Economics & Sociology, 14(3), 322-340.
- Lyeonov, S., Samusevych, Y., Gurmach, A., & Juscius, V. (2022). Management of the sports industry for ensuring the public health: Prospect of implementing the innovations. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 14(3), 109-119.
- Melnyk, M., Syniura-Rostun, N., Lysiak, N., & Dzyubina, A. (2021). Business environment of regions in Ukraine: Peculiarities of structural-institutional changes. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 456-469.
- Nsouli, Z. F. (2022). Can Private Public Partnership Pullout Lebanon Out of Its Worst Economic Crisis? Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(3), 13-17.
- Oe, H., Yamaoka, Y., & Duda, K. (2022). How to Sustain Businesses in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Focus on Innovation, Sustainability and Leadership. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(4), 1-9.
- Pauna, R. D., Pintea, A., Lazar, P. S., & Maiar, D. (2020). The effects of financing sports activities on international sports performance and on the population’s health. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(10), 950-965.
- Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309-328.
- Petry, K., Steinbach, D., & Tokarski, W. (2004). Sport systems in the countries of the European Union: Similarities and differences. European Journal for Sport and Society, 1(1), 15-21.
- Pozeriene, J., Macenaite, O., Reklaitiene, D., & Ostasevicience, V. (2021). The importance of sporting activity for men (As advanced consumers) self-esteem and reduction of social exclusion. Transformations in Business and Economics, 20(2), 264-275.
- Ramli, M., Boutayeba, F., & Nezai, A. (2022). Public Investment in Human Capital and Economic Growth in Algeria: An empirical study using ARDL approach. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(2), 55-66.
- Ratten, V. (2012). Sports entrepreneurship: Challenges and directions for future research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 4(1), 65-76.
- Rayevnyeva, O., Brovko, O., Filip, S., Aksonova, I., & Derykhovska, V. (2020). Management and modelling of the industrial enterprise’s crisis situations. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(1), 192-205.
- Shevchenko, H., & Petrushenko, M. (2022). Managing change in nature-based tourism: A decision-making model using linear programming. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 199-219.
- Spaaij, R., & Westerbeek, H. (2010). Sport business and social capital: A contradiction in terms? Sport in Society, 13(9), 1356-1373.
- SportsEconAustria, Sport Industry Research Centre at Sheffield Hallam University, Statistical Service of the Republic of Cyprus, Meerwaarde Sport en Economie, Federation of the European Sporting Goods Industry, & Ministry of Sport and Tourism of the Republic of Poland. (2012). Study on the contribution of sport to economic growth and employment in the EU (Final Report). Publications Office of the EU.
- Vamplew, W. (2018). Products, promotion and (possibly) profits: Sports entrepreneurship revisited. Journal of Sport History, 45(2), 183-201.
- World Health Organization (WHO). (2022, October 5). Physical activity.
- World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Health Topic. Physical Activity.
- Xifra, J. (2010). Relaciones públicas y nacionalismo: Una aproximación a la construcción nacional desde la perspectiva de las relaciones públicas. Trípodos, 26, 117-132.
- Yan, W. (2020). Olympic games as a digital media product. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 306-318.
- Ziming, L. (2021). Management of sports industry: Moving to economic development. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 230-236.
-
Impact on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia’s economic growth
Rabiul Islam ,
Ahmad Bashawir Abdul Ghani ,
Irwanshah Zainal Abidin ,
Jeya Malar Rayaiappan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.05
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 55-62 Views: 11917 Downloads: 5693 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPoverty and income inequality are extreme issues that still exist in Malaysia. Any rise in poverty and income inequality definitely affect economic growth. There are many great efforts taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and to reduce the gap of income inequality which occurs since 1970’s. The incidence of poverty and income inequality is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. This paper is mainly to study the level of poverty and income inequality in Malaysia together with government intervention to develop Malaysia’s economic growth. The research is focused among the working people at Ipoh, Perak. In this paper, questionnaire forms are being distributed to get information regarding the issue of poverty and income inequality. It also looks into the strategies taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and income inequality. Few recommendations are given in terms of education policy, financial aid and assistance from government and non-government organization (NGO) to upgrade the standard and quality of living among the poor and lower-income group of people.
-
Impact of inflation on economic growth: evidence from Nigeria
Anthony Olugbenga Adaramola ,
Oluwabunmi Dada
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 1-13 Views: 9135 Downloads: 5469 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn an attempt to examine the influence of inflation on the growth prospects of the Nigerian economy, the study employs the autoregressive distributed lag on the selected variables, i.e. real gross domestic product (GDP), inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate, degree of economy`s openness, money supply, and government consumption expenditures for the period 1980–2018. The study findings indicate that inflation and real exchange rate exert a significant negative impact on economic growth, while interest rate and money supply indicate a positive and significant impact on economic growth. Other variables in the model depict no influence on the economic growth of Nigeria. The causality result shows the unidirectional relationships between interest rate, exchange rate, government consumption expenditures and gross domestic product. However, inflation and the degree of openness show no causal relationship with gross domestic product. As a result, the study recommends that a more pragmatic effort is needed by the monetary authorities to target the inflation vigorously to prevent its adverse effect by ensuring a tolerable rate that would stimulate the economic growth of Nigeria.
-
Formalization of the impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources on economic growth of countries in Central and Eastern Europe
Serhiy Kozmenko ,
Maxim Korneyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.06
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 48-58 Views: 7875 Downloads: 1375 TO CITEThe article deals with the impact of financialization on economic growth in countries of Central and Eastern Europe. It determinesthe impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization on economic growth of these countries. It proves that the implementation of measures aimed at increasing the openness of the economy and maintaining solvent demand have a positive impact on economic growth of the surveyed countries in the long run. It also proves the importance of developing a set of measures of strategic nature regulating imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization.
