Does corporate governance moderate the effect of corporate social responsibility on a firm’s financial performance?
-
Author(s)Oleh PaskoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-5885
,
Nataliia LagodiienkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8472-1395
,
Nataliia KudlaievaLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8369-886X
,
Lesia RiabenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5299-9827
,
Nataliia GerasymenkoLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-8952
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(4).2022.44
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #4, pp. 588-601
- Cited by
- 774 Views
-
187 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Drawing on the agency and resource dependence theories, the paper assumes that the impact of corporate social responsibility on companies’ financial performance should be investigated not in a binary manner but against the backdrop of corporate governance. The analysis is based on testing the dataset retrieved from the Chinese Stock Market and Accounting Research database containing 28,200 company-year observations of 3,576 Chinese listed companies covering 2008–2019. The findings accentuate that corporate social responsibility, interacting with board size, equity concentration, and CEO duality, positively impacts a firm’s financial performance. In contrast, the study fails to substantiate the claim that board gender diversity and board independence moderate the bond between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Thus, by exploring five elements of corporate governance, this study takes a step forward in understanding exactly which elements of corporate governance best suit corporate social responsibility to enhance financial performance in China’s institutional settings. This study assists in filling the gap in corporate social responsibility research by displaying and corroborating the moderating effects of corporate governance attributes on the nexus between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in China. Therefore, this paper presents valuable information and details for companies and regulators alike to improve the impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance by focusing on corporate governance quality.
Acknowledgment
This paper is co-funded by European Union through the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) within the project “EU Best Practice Of Life Cycle Assessment, Social, Environmental Accounting And Sustainability Reporting 101047667 – EULASTING – ERASMUS-JMO-2021-HEI-TCH-RSCH” (https://bit.ly/3Bbvquw).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G34, M14, M41
-
References52
-
Tables7
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Sample selection process
- Table 2. Industry distribution of the sample
- Table 3. Variables definition
- Table 4. Descriptive statistics
- Table 5. Pearson correlation test
- Table 6. Regression results
- Table 7. Effects of corporate governance attribute on CSRD and FP interaction
-
- Abu Qa’dan, M. B., & Suwaidan, M. S. (2019). Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: The case of Jordan. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 28-46.
- Abukari, K., Musah, A., & Assaidi, A. (2022). The role of corporate sustainability and its consistency on firm financial performance: Canadian evidence*. Accounting Perspectives.
- Alnabsha, A., Abdou, H. A., Ntim, C. G., & Elamer, A. A. (2018). Corporate boards, ownership structures and corporate disclosures. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(1), 20-41.
- Alshbili, I., Elamer, A. A., & Beddewela, E. (2019). Ownership types, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures. Accounting Research Journal, 33(1), 148-166.
- Ameer, R. (2012). Impact of cash holdings and ownership concentration on firm valuation. Review of Accounting and Finance, 11(4), 448-467.
- Ananzeh, H. (2022). Corporate governance and the quality of CSR disclosure: Lessons from an emerging economy. Society and Business Review, 17(2), 280-306.
- Ananzeh, H., Alshurafat, H., Bugshan, A., & Hussainey, K. (2022). The impact of corporate governance on forward-looking CSR disclosure. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting.
- Babajee, R. B., Seetanah, B., Nunkoo, R., & Gopy-Ramdhany, N. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and hotel financial performance. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(2), 226-246.
- Ben Fatma, H., & Chouaibi, J. (2021). Corporate governance and CSR disclosure: Evidence from European financial institutions. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 346-361.
- Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185-197.
- Briano-Turrent, G. del C. (2022). Female representation on boards and corporate ethical behavior in Latin American companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 30(1), 80-95.
- Chan, M. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 59-73.
- Cooper, E., & Uzun, H. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and bankruptcy. Studies in Economics and Finance, 36(2), 130-153.
- Crifo, P., Diaye, M.-A., & Pekovic, S. (2016). CSR related management practices and firm performance: An empirical analysis of the quantity–quality trade-off on French data. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 405-416.
- Crifo, P., Diaye, M.-A., Oueghlissi, R., & Pekovic, S. (2016). What drives firms’ corporate social responsibility? The role of ownership concentration. In R. Manos & I. Drori (Eds.), Corporate responsibility (pp. 183-204). Palgrave Macmillan.
- D’Souza, C., Ahmed, T., Khashru, M. A., Ahmed, R., Ratten, V., & Jayaratne, M. (2022). The complexity of stakeholder pressures and their influence on social and environmental responsibilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132038.
- de Graaf, F. J., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2013). The role of governance in corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 52(2), 282-317.
- Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2013). Environmental standards and labor productivity: Understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 230-252.
- Ding, R., Duan, T., Hou, W., Liu, X., & Xu, Z. (2022). Do women drive corporate social responsibility? Evidence from gender diversity reforms around the world. International Review of Law and Economics, 72, 106097.
- Ebaid, I. E.-S. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Global Responsibility, 13(4), 396-420.
- Fasan, M., & Mio, C. (2017). Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality disclosure in integrated reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288-305.
- Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and corporate social responsibility: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 289-306.
- Geletkanycz, M. A. (2020). Social movement spillover: Barriers to board gender diversity posed by contemporary governance reform. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(6), 101438.
- Hamrouni, A., Bouattour, M., Ben Farhat Toumi, N., & Boussaada, R. (2022). Corporate social responsibility disclosure and information asymmetry: Does boardroom attributes matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 897-920.
- Homer, S. T. (2022). A case-study approach to mapping corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 127(3), 663-684.
- Isaksson, L. E., & Woodside, A. G. (2016). Modeling firm heterogeneity in corporate social performance and financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3285-3314.
- Jiang, H., Habib, A., & Hu, B. (2011). Ownership concentration, voluntary disclosures and information asymmetry in New Zealand. The British Accounting Review, 43(1), 39-53.
- Kumar, K., Kumari, R., Nandy, M., Sarim, M., & Kumar, R. (2022). Do ownership structures and governance attributes matter for corporate sustainability reporting? An examination in the Indian context. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(5), 1077-1096.
- Mahoney, L., & Roberts, R. W. (2007). Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms. Accounting Forum, 31(3), 233-253.
- Makarenko, I., Sukhonos, V., V. Zhuravlyova, I., Legenchuk, S., & Szołno, O. (2020). Sustainability reporting assessment for quality and compliance: The case of Ukrainian banks’ management reports. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(2), 117-129.
- Mohamed Adnan, S., Hay, D., & van Staden, C. J. (2018). The influence of culture and corporate governance on corporate social responsibility disclosure: A cross country analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 820-832.
- Nakamura, M. (Ed.). (2008). Changing Corporate Governance Practices in China and Japan. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Nguyen, T. T. P., & Thai, H. M. (2022). Effects of female directors on gender diversity at lower organization levels and CSR performance: Evidence in Japan. Global Finance Journal, 53, 100749.
- Pasko, O., Chen, F., Birchenko, N., & Ryzhikova, N. (2021a). Corporate governance attributes and accounting conservatism: Evidence from China. Studies in Business and Economics, 16(3), 173-189.
- Pasko, O., Chen, F., Proskurina, N., Mao, R., Gryn, V., & Pushkar, I. (2021b). Are corporate social responsibility active firms less involved in earnings management? Empirical evidence from China. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 504-516.
- Pasko, O., Marenych, T., Diachenko, O., Levytska, I., & Balla, I. (2021c). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: the case study of Ukrainian public agricultural companies. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 58-80.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Bezverkhyi, K., Nikytenko, D., & Khromushyna, L. (2021d). Does external assurance on CSR reporting contribute to its higher quality? Empirical evidence from China. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 18(4), 309-325.
- Pekovic, S., & Vogt, S. (2021). The fit between corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: the impact on a firm’s financial performance. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1095-1125.
- Rehman, I. U., Naqvi, S. K., Shahzad, F., & Jamil, A. (2021). Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry: the moderating role of ownership concentration. Social Responsibility Journal.
- Rehman, Z. ur, Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Asif, M., Alharthi, M., Irfan, M., & Glowacz, A. (2020). Do corporate social responsibility disclosures improve financial performance? A perspective of the Islamic banking industry in Pakistan. Sustainability, 12(8), 3302.
- Rothenberg, S., Hull, C. E., & Tang, Z. (2017). The impact of human resource management on corporate social performance strengths and concerns. Business & Society, 56(3), 391-418.
- Sacconi, L. (2011). A Rawlsian view of CSR and the game theory of its implementation (Part I): The multi-stakeholder model of corporate governance. In L. Sacconi, M. Blair, R. E. Freeman, & A. Vercelli (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance (pp. 157-193). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The Role of customer awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
- Sokil, O., Zvezdov, D., Zhuk, V., Kucherkova, S., & Sakhno, L. (2020). Social and environmental costs: the impact of accounting and analytical support on enterprises’ sustainable development in Germany and Ukraine. Economic Annals-ХХI, 181(1-2), 124-136.
- Soobaroyen, T., Ramdhony, D., Rashid, A., & Gow, J. (2022). The evolution and determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in a developing country: extent and quality. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies.
- Tang, Z., Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2012). How corporate social responsibility engagement strategy moderates the CSR-financial performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1274-1303.
- Voinea, C. L., Rauf, F., Naveed, K., & Fratostiteanu, C. (2022). The impact of CEO duality and financial performance on CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from state-owned enterprises in China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), 37.
- Wang, Q., Chen, H., Xue, Y., & Liang, H. (2022). How corporate social responsibility affects firm performance: The inverted-U shape contingent on founder CEO. Sustainability, 14(18), 11340.
- Wang, Y., Liu, J., Sui, X., & Liu, L. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility improve financial performance? Evidence from pure green side. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101522.
- Wasiuzzaman, S., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility: Is it a matter of slack financial resources or strategy or both? Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(6), 2444-2466.
- Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 50-84.
- Zaman, R., Jain, T., Samara, G., & Jamali, D. (2022). Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface. Business & Society, 61(3), 690-752.
-
The role of accounting in sustainable development
Inna Makarenko ,
Alex Plastun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(2).2017.01
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 4-12 Views: 7664 Downloads: 4732 TO CITEIdeology of Sustainable Development and Sustainable Development Goals influence the transformation of business processes in the companies. Professional accountants are important part of this transformation. In this paper the role of accounting in Sustainable Development Goals achievement is discussed. Different approaches to structuring the role of professional accountants in Sustainable Development are investigated. Among them are types of roles that perform accountants, their professional functions, skills and competencies in the corporate environment. As the result a holistic vision of the role of accounting in sustainable development in the new economic conditions is provided.
-
The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: accounting for endogeneity
Hyunjung Choi , Byungchul Choi ,
Jungyoon Byun
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.06
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 69-84 Views: 4619 Downloads: 545 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis study examines the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and earnings management after controlling for endogeneity of CSR. Using a sample of non-financial firms listed on Korean Securities Market between 2002 and 2010, this study finds that ignoring endogeneity biases the estimated relation between CSR and earnings management. Specifically, the results show that the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and discretionary accruals reported in the previous studies becomes insignificant. However, the negative and significant relation between CSR commitment and real activities manipulation remains significant even when the endogeneity of CSR commitment is taken into account. Therefore, this study provides evidence that proactive CSR engagement significantly affects firm’s practice of real activities manipulation, while it does not affect its practice of discretionary accruals. These results indicate that CSR commitment leads managers to be more responsible in management of operational activities than in accruals management.
-
Does board composition have an impact on CSR reporting?
Patrick Velte
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2).2017.02
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 19-35 Views: 4473 Downloads: 1719 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯCorporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting plays a key role in management control, particularly in light of the increased demand for non-financial reporting after the financial crisis of 2008–2009. This literature review evaluates 47 empirical studies that concentrate on the influence of several board composition variables on the quantity and quality of CSR reporting. The author briefly introduces the research framework that underpins current empirical studies in this field. This is followed by a discussion of the main variables of board composition: (1) committees (audit and CSR committees), (2) board independence, (3) board expertise, (4) CEO duality, (5) board diversity (gender and foreign diversity), (6) board activity, and (7) board size. The author, then, summarizes the key findings, discusses the limitations of the existing research and offers useful recommendations for researchers, firm practice and regulators.
