The role of political will in enhancing e-government: An empirical case in Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.07
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #1, pp. 69-79
- Cited by
- 1088 Views
-
351 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
E-government is an issue that is widely discussed by several studies because it has an impact on improving government performance. Weak political will of the heads of state and regional heads reduces attention to e-government, combined with various obstacles to its implementation. This study can answer the importance of the role of political will in maximizing the implementation of electronic government in local government. A total of 263 data were collected to answer the hypothesis quantitatively. The data were obtained by distributing questionnaires directly to the respondents, namely the Heads of Regional Apparatus Organizations (OPD). The sample selection was carried out with regional heads. Data were tested through multivariate analysis using Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The test results found that political will has a direct positive effect on the implementation of e-government as evidenced by the path coefficient of 0.457 and significant wit h an alpha of 5%. Political will also acts as a mediating variable or can act as an intermediary in the relationship between IT infrastructure and human resources in improving e-government. All variables have a T-statistic value > 1.96 and < 5%, which means that IT infrastructure and human resources have a direct and significant effect on the implementation of e-government.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H76, O38, P26
-
References55
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Convergent validity results
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of respondents
- Table 2. Validity test results
- Table 3. Reliability test results
- Table 4. Bootstraping test results
-
- Aboluwodi, A. (2015). Political Will and Strategic Planning in the Implementation of Universal Basic Education in Nigeria: The Obafemi Awolowo Example. Journal of Education and Research, 5(1), 41-55.
- Adam, I. O. (2020). Examining E-Government Development Effects on Corruption in Africa: The Mediating Effects of ICT Development and Institutional Quality. Technology in Society, 61(February), 1-10.
- Al-Busaidy, M., & Weerakkody, V. (2008). Factors Influencing E-Government Implementation Progress in Oman: a Discussion. In European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-9).
- Almarabeh, T., & Abuali, A. (2010). A General Framework for E-Government : Definition Maturity Challenges, Opportunities, and Success. European Journal of Scientifich Research, 39(1), 29-42.
- Alshehri, M., & Drew, S. (2010). Implementation of e-Government: Advantages and Challenges. In IASK International Confrerence E-Activity and Leading Technologies & Inter TIC (pp. 79-86).
- Angguna, Y. P., Gani, A. Y. A., & Sarwono. (2015). Upaya Pengembangan E-Government dalam Pelayanan Publik pada Dinas Koperasi dan UKM Kota Malang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 3(1), 80-88.
- Anthopoulus, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2015). Why e-government Projects Fail? an Analysis of the Healthcare.gov Website. Government Information Quarterly.
- Apleni, A., & Smuts, H. (2020). An e-Government Implementation Framework: A Developing Country Case Study. International Federation for Information Processing, 15-27.
- Ariana, S., Azim, C., & Antoni, D. (2020). Clustering of ICT Human Resources Capacity in the Implementation of E-government in Expansion Area: a Case Study From Pali Regency. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1).
- Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2000). Assessing Political Will for Anti-Corruption Efforts: an Analytic Framework. Public Administration and Development, 20, 239-252.
- Bwalya, K. J. (2009). Factors Affecting Adoption of e-Government in Zambia. The Electronic Journal on Information System in Developing Countries (EJISDC), 38(4), 1-13.
- Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The Utilization of E-government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors. Information Systems Journal, 15, 5-25.
- Cash, C. (2016). Good Governance and Strong Political Will : Are They Enough for Transformation ? Land Use Policy, 50, 301-311.
- Clemens, E. S., & Cook, J. M. (1999). Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 441-466.
- Dada, D. (2006). The Failure of E-Government in Developing Countries: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 26(1), 1-10.
- Dahwan, A. A., & Raju, V. (2021). The Infleuence of Online Services and Telecommunication Infrastructure on the Implementation of E-government in Military Institutions in Yemen. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(4), 1044-1056.
- Danyliuk, M., Dmytryshyn, M., & Goran, T. (2021). Informatization in Ukraine: Realities, Problems, Prospects. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(4), 190.
- Das, A., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2016). Information & Management A longitudinal study of e-government maturity. Information & Management.
- Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Affairs, 37(2), 183-190.
- Defitri, S. Y., Bahari, A., Handra, H., & Febrianto, R. (2020). Determinant Factors of E-Government Implementation and Public Accountability: TOE Framework Approach. Public Policy and Administration, 19(4), 37-51.
- Elnaim, B. M. E. (2014). An Overview of E-Government Strategy In Sudan. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 2(2), 1-9.
- EOCD Report. (2003). The Case for E-Government : Excerpts from the OECD Report “The E-Government Imperative.” OECD Jurnal on Budgeting, 3(1), 61-96.
- Eyob, E. (2004). E-government : Breaking the Frontiers of Inefficiencies in the Public Sector. Electronic Government, 1(1), 107-114.
- Fountain, J. (2011). Bringing Institutions Back In to Strategic Management: The Politics of Digitally Mediated Institutional Change. National Center for Digital Government Working Papers, 11(001), 1-48.
- Hammergren, L. (1998). Political Will, Constituency Building, and Public Support in Rule of Law Programs.
- Hapsara, M., Imran, A., & Turner, T. (2017). Beyond Organizational Motives of e-Government Adoption: The Case of e-Voting Initiative in Indonesian Villages. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 362-369.
- Harijadi, D. A., & Satriya, E. (2000). Indonesia’s Road Map to E-Government: Opportunities and Challenges. In APEC High-Level Symposium on E-Government, Seoul, Korea (pp. 1-8).
- Huang, Z. (2006). E-Government Practices At Local Levels: An Analysis of U.S. Counties’ Websites. Issues in Information Systems, VII(2), 165-170.
- Huang, Z., & Bwoma, P. O. (2003). An Overview of Critical Issues of E-government. Issues of Information Systems, 4(1), 164-170.
- Ifinedo, P. (2011). Factors Influencing Maturity in Transition Economies and Developing Countries : A Longitudinal Perspective. Advance in Information Systems, 42(4), 98-116.
- Ishaq, S. (2018). Political Will Drives Community Participation in Centrally Sponsored Watershed Development Programmes. International Journal of English Languange, Literature in Humanities, 6(7), 679-691.
- Kpundeh, S. J. (1998). Political Will in Fighting Corruption. United Nations Development Programme.
- Krishnan, S., & Teo, T. S. (2012). Moderating Effects of Governance on Information Infrastructure and E-Government Development. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology.
- Kumajas, Y. N. (2021). The Effects of Human Resources Quality, Infrastructure, Leadership, and Communication on E-Government Implementation: A Case of Indonesia Local Government. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 597-612.
- Manenji, T., & Marufu, B. (2016). The Impact of Adopting E-government as a Mechanism to Enhance Accountability as well as Transparent Conduct Within Public Institutions. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, 03(07), 84-101.
- Michael, P., Dimitriou, S., Glyptis, L., & Zarifis, A. (2018). E-Government Implementation Challenges in Developing Countries: The Project Manager’s Perspective. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research (IJPAMR), 4(3), 1-17.
- Muhaya, F. Bin, Bakry, S. H., & Alalmaee, S. M. (2015). E-Government Success Factors: Views of Saudi Professionals. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Organization Management, 4(1), 1-6.
- Nkohkwo, Q. N., & Islam, M. S. (2013). Challenges to the Successful Implementation of e-Government Initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Literature Review Research. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 11(2), 253-267.
- Odat, A. M. (2012). E-Government in Developing Countries: Framework of Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 46(2), 1013-1021.
- Pfano, M., & Beharry, A. (2016). The Effect of Modern Office Technology on Management Performance: Durban Westville. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 14(2), 376-384.
- Ramli, R. M. (2017). E-government Implementation Challenges in Malaysia and South Korea: A Comparative Study. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 80(1).
- Rasyid, F. A., & Dulkiah, M. (2020). Political Will Implementation of The Government in Hope Family Program Policy. Journal of Governance, 5(1).
- Reddick, C. G. (2004). Empirical Models of E-Government Growth in Local Governments. E-Service Journal, 59-84.
- Rogers, E. M. (1971). Diffusion of innovations. An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research (3rd ed.). United States of America: Library of Congress Cataloging.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Springer International Publishing.
- Siau, K., & Long, Y. (2009). Factors Impacting E-Government Development. Journal of Computer Information Systems, September, 98-107.
- Singh, H., Das, A., & Joseph, D. (2004). Country-level determinants of e-Government Maturity.
- Stier, S. (2015). Political Determinants of E-government Performance Revisited: Comparing Democracies and Autocracies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 270-278.
- United-Nation. (2002). Benchmarking E-government : A Global Perspective Assessing the Progress of the UN Member States. U.N. Publications.
- United Nations. (2020). E-Government Survey 2020 (Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development). New York.
- Wairiuko, J. W., Nyonje, R., & Omulo, E. O. (2018). Human Resource Capacity and Adoption of E-Government for Improved Service Delivery in Kajiado County, Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(10), 94-110.
- Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging Citizen Adoption of e-Government by Building Trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157-162.
- Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Kurunananda, A. (2009). Implementing E-Government in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK. Information Technology for Development, 15(3), 171-192.
- Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., & Al-Shafi, S. H. (2011). Exploring the complexities of E-government Implementation and Diffusion in a Developing Country: Some Lessons from the State of Qatar. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(2), 172-196.
- Zeebaree, M., Sattar, S., Ismael, G. Y., Qader, A. N., & Aqel, M. (2020). Impact of Infrastructure Barriers on Electronic Government Implementation. Estudios de Economia Aplicada, 38(4), 1-15.