Attitudes towards infopreneurship among information science students at a higher education institution
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(1).2022.05
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2022, Issue #1, pp. 49-57
- Cited by
- 990 Views
-
379 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aimed to explore the attitudes of students of a higher education institution towards infopreneurship. The study emanated from observations that the widespread use of information technologies has created a new sector in the labor market – infopreneurship. The study adopted the case study research design based on focus group discussions to establish the students’ attitudes towards infopreneurship. The participants for the focus groups were students of the Information Science department at the University of Technology, Cape Town. Data collection during the focus group discussions was based on unstructured interviews. Quantitative data analysis was applied based on data reduction from codes to categories. An enterprising attitude (26.4% code frequency) dominated the positive responses while negative attitudes were mainly reflected by a critical attitude (20.8% code frequency) towards infopreneurship. While it appeared that positive attitudes were more prevalent than negative attitudes, there were notable observations that the respondents were critical or neutral towards the essence of infopreneurship in the South African context. It was found that the belief that infopreneurship is not a viable form of employment was still prevalent. Some respondents believed that employment means working for someone. They felt that there is greater respect in being employed than engaging in infopreneurship. Some respondents, however, appear to have stronger entrepreneurial orientations and felt that infopreneurship offers the best employment opportunities. The study recommends changes in higher education curricula and the creation of a stimulating environment for infopreneurship.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L25, L26, L53, M13
-
References32
-
Tables3
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Network diagram for the attitudes of respondents towards infopreneurship
-
- Table 1. Activities of infopreneurs
- Table 2. Focus group discussion record sheet
- Table 3. Code frequencies
-
- Adesemowo, A. K., von Solms, R., & Botha, R. A. (2016). Safeguarding information as an asset: Do we need a redefinition in the knowledge economy and beyond? South African Journal of Information Management, 18(1), a706.
- Adetayo, A. J., & Hamzat, S. A. (2021). Infopreneurship and financial satisfaction among library professionals in tertiary institutions in Ede, Osun, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 4749.
- Bowmaker-Falconer, A., & Herrington, M. (2020). Igniting start-ups for economic growth and social change (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor South Africa (GEM SA) 2019/2020 report). Cape Town: University of Stellenbosch Business School.
- Bux, S., & van Vuuren, J. (2019). The effect of entrepreneurship education programs on the development of self-efficacy, entrepreneurial intention and predictions for entrepreneurial activity. Acta Commercii, 19(2), a615.
- Calvo-Porral, C., & Pesqueira-Sanchez, R. (2020). Generational differences in technology behaviour: comparing millennials and Generation X. Kybernetes, 49(11), 2755-2772.
- Campagnolo, G., & Vivel, C. (2012). Before Schumpeter: forerunners of the theory of the entrepreneur in 1900s German political economy – Werner Sombart, Friedrich von Wieser. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19(6), 908-943.
- Chandler, S. (2007). From entrepreneur to infopreneur. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
- Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis (12th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage Books.
- Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Plano, V. L. C., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: selection and implementation. The Counselling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.
- Dawson, C. (2002). Practical research methods: a user-friendly guide to mastering research techniques and projects. Oxford: How to Books.
- Du Toit, A. (2000). Teaching infopreneurship: students’ perspectives. Aslib Proceedings, 52(2), 83-90.
- Dutta, D. K., & Crossan, M. M. (2005). The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: Understanding the process using the 4I organizational learning framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 425-449.
- Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333-349.
- El-Kalash, K. I., Mohammed, S. B., & Aniki, Y. (2016). Exploring infopreneurship for economic growth and sustainability in a developing economy: the Nigeria perspective. Journal of Educational Policy and Entrepreneurial Research (JEPER), 3(7), 240-249.
- Jennings, S. (1998). Librarians, cybrarians, infopreneurs and webmasters. VINE, 28(4), 13-17.
- Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, J. A. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
- Lose, T. (2019). A framework for the effective creation of business incubators in South Africa (Doctoral Thesis). Vaal University of Technology.
- Lose, T. (2021a). Business incubators in South Africa: a resource-based view perspective. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(1), 1-11.
- Lose, T. (2021b). Institutionalized business incubation: a frontier for accelerating entrepreneurship in African countries. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(1), 1-10.
- Masron, M. Z., Yatin, S. F. M., Hussin, N., Taib, K. M., & Wah, Y. P. (2017). Infopreneurship: new career for university graduates. Journal of Informatics and Mathematical Sciences, 9(4), 1219-1226.
- Mudzana, T., & Kotze, E. (2015). Some determinants of business intelligence adoption using the technology-organization-environment framework: a developing country perspective. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 13(1), 107-119.
- Ndlovu, M., & Makgetla, N. (2017). Special edition: The state of small business in South Africa. In The real Economy Bulletin. Pretoria.
- Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a practical example. Evidence Based Nursing, 17(1), 2-3.
- Nurhadi, N., & Purnomo, M. (2018). Predicting e-commerce adoption in small hotel: the role of technology-organization-environment framework. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 29(3), 324-341.
- Olaitan, O., & Flowerday, S. (2016). Successful IT governance in SMEs: an application of the Technology–Organization–Environment theory. South African Journal of Information Management, 18(1), a696.
- Russill, C. (2016). Pragmatism. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, 1-13.
- Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
- Schumpeter, J., & Nichol, A. J. (1934). Robinson’s Economics of Imperfect Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 42(2), 249-259.
- Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 3, 68-70.
- Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technological innovation. Lexington Books, United Kingdom.
- Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5(3), 65-72.