Application of decision tree model for prediction of immigration policy in different countries of the world
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.42
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #3, pp. 513-532
- 631 Views
-
244 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In the past few decades, the ever-increasing dynamics of international migration flows can be observed. At this stage, the governments of major countries in the world are striving to balance the needs of their citizens and the support of immigrants. The paper analyzes factors that affect the immigration policies of various countries and determines the role of ecological factors (such as environmental conditions). The objective of the study is to predict the immigration policies of different countries of the world based on the analysis of the influencing factors, including environmental performance. The research method is based on the use of the RapidMiner software package to build two decision tree models and a static index database of more than 150 countries around the world. The results show that in most cases, the immigration policies of various countries will focus on maintaining the current level of immigration and increasing the number of skilled workers. At the same time, one of the key decision-making factors will be the country’s current immigration level, environmental performance, GDP per capita, and the Education index. One of the main conclusions is that the country’s environmental indicators have begun to become one of the priority values that determine the state immigration policy. This can be explained by the rising global community interest in the challenges of climate change.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F22, Q56
-
References33
-
Tables2
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Classification of the main types of immigration policies based on the UN approach
- Figure 2. General view of 1st and 2nd classification models
- Figure 3. Decision tree for classification of policy on immigration
- Figure 4. Decision tree for classification of immigration policy on highly skilled workers
-
- Table 1. Key indicators for calculating the model
- Table A1. Data set for 1st Model “Decision tree for classification of policy on immigration” and 2nd Model “Decision tree for classification of policy on immigration”
-
- Adisa, O., & McSharry, P. E. (2020). Female enrollment, child mortality and corruption are good predictors of a country’s UN Education Index (Thesis). Child Mortality and Corruption Are Good Predictors of a Country’s UN Education Index Project.
- Aleksynska, M., & Tritah, A. (2015). The heterogeneity of immigrants, host countries’income and productivity: a channel accounting approach. Economic Inquiry, 53(1), 150-172.
- Anderson, B. (2010). Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, employment and society, 24(2), 300-317.
- Barnett, J. (2003). Security and climate change. Global environmental change, 13(1), 7-17.
- Bernardini, E. (2019). The highly skilled migrant in contemporary society: a conceptual analysis. Conference Proceedings of the Third International Symposium Od Diaspore Italiane, 29-33. Genova, Italy.
- Cangiano, A. (2012). Immigration policy and migrant labour market outcomes in the European Union: New evidence from the EU Labour Force Survey (Working Paper).
- Chandrasekar, P., Qian, K., Shahriar, H., & Bhattacharya, P. (2017). Improving the prediction accuracy of decision tree mining with data preprocessing. 2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 481-484.
- d’Albis, H., Boubtane, E., & Coulibaly, D. (2018). Macroeconomic evidence suggests that asylum seekers are not a “burden” for Western European countries. Science advances, 4(6), eaaq0883.
- Détang-Dessendre, C., Partridge, M. D., & Piguet, V. (2016). Local labor market flexibility in a perceived low migration country: The case of French labor markets. Regional science and urban economics, 58, 89-103.
- Dustmann, C., Hatton, T., & Preston, I. (2005). The labour market effects of immigration. The Economic Journal, 115(507), F297-F299.
- Feng, S., Krueger, A. B., & Oppenheimer, M. (2010). Linkages among climate change, crop yields and Mexico–US cross-border migration. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 107(32), 14257-14262.
- Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Global Future, & International Organization for Migration. (2017). Tomorrow’s World of Migration. Geneva, Switzerland: FES, Global Future, IOM.
- Gabriel, C., & Pellerin, H. (2012). Governing International Labour Migration: Current Issues, Challenges and Dilemmas. Routledge.
- Ghimis, A. (2016). The EU’s Labour Migration Policy: Recent Developments and What More is Needed. IEMed Mediterranean.
- International Organization for Migration. (2019). World Migration Report 2020.
- Johnson, I. I. (2011). Immigration as a Response Variable to Climate Change from Mexico into the United States. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 3(3).
- Kalra, V., & Aggarwal, R. (2017). Importance of Text Data Preprocessing & Implementation in RapidMiner. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information Technology and Knowledge Management, 71-75.
- Lacroix, T. (2012). Designing a structure/agency approach to transnationalism (Working Paper). University of Oxford.
- Laffineur, C., Moreno-Galbis, E., Tanguy, J., & Tritah, A. (2017). Are immigrants’ skills priced differently? Evidence from France.
- McAuliffe, M., & Khadria, B. (2019). Report overview: Providing perspective on migration and mobility in increasingly uncertain times (World Migration Report 2020).
- Migration Policy Institute. (n.d.). Total Immigrant and Emigrant Populations by Country.
- Ndiaye, P. O. (2018). Migration d’étude, migration de travail: deux faces indissociables d’une même réalité? Géo-Regards, (10), 109-121. (In French).
- Patel, H. H., & Prajapati, P. (2018). Study and analysis of decision tree based classification algorithms. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 6(10), 74-78.
- Prieur, F., & Schumacher, I. (2016). The role of conflict for optimal climate and immigration policy (TSE Working Paper 16-663). Toulouse School of Economics.
- Ries, L. (2020, October 21). President Trump and Joe Biden: Comparing Immigration Policies. The Heritage Foundation.
- Stakanov, R.D. (2014). Osoblyvosti mihratsiinoi polityky rozvynenykh krain svitu v XXI st [Peculiarities of developed countries migration policies in the twenty-first century]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, 15, 11-15. (In Ukrainian).
- Timmer, A. S., & Williams, J. G. (1998). Immigration policy prior to the 1930s: Labor markets, policy interactions, and globalization backlash. Population and Development Review, 24(4), 739-771.
- United Nations. (2017). International Migration Policies: Data Booklet.
- United Nations. (2020). Human Development Report 2020 – Education Index 2020.
- United Nations. (n.d.). Human Development Data Center.
- Wendling, Z. A., Emerson, J. W., de Sherbinin, A., Esty, D. C., Hoving, K., Ospina, C., Murray, J.-M., Gunn, L., Ferrato, M., Schreck, M., Jacob, M., Dahl, N., & Gordon, A. (2020). 2020 Environmental Performance Index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
- World Bank Data. (n.d.a). GDP per capita (current US$).
- World Bank Data. (n.d.b). Population, total.