Balanced scorecard for implementing united territorial communities’ social responsibility
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.12
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #2, pp. 128-139
- Cited by
- 934 Views
-
179 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Under decentralization, local governments gain more rights and opportunities to use various types of resources, thus, increasing their level of responsibility (including social responsibility) for the use of resources. The paper aims to reveal the consequences of decentralization reform for the indicators of united territorial communities (UTCs) budgeting that reflect their general socio-economic condition, as well as the nature of the latter one; to adapt the balanced scorecard (BSC) to the feature of UTCs’ functioning, and to develop the UTCs strategic map. The paper indicates that the system of balanced indicators is an analytical tool for ensuring the realization of the concept of social responsibility of the UТСs. The research resulted in the development of the balanced scorecard of indicators for UTCs. It includes the following blocks: internal business processes, funding, service providers, service consumers, and environment. The research contributed to the development of UTCs strategic map based on BSC adapted to the peculiarities of UTCs. The strategic map provides an opportunity to link strategic goals of UTCs with the developed BSC blocks and allows for a successful implementation of the concept of UTCs’ social responsibility in conditions of the need to achieve sustainable development.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M14, M21, M40, M49
-
References42
-
Tables1
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Own revenues of local budgets fund, UAH billion
- Figure 2. Own revenues of general local budgets fund per capita in January-December 2016–2018, UAH
- Figure 3. Information component of BSC blocks
- Figure 4. Strategic map for Broshniv-Osadska UTC
-
- Table 1. Own income revenues of 665 UTCs in January-December 2018 compared to January-December 2017
-
- Amaeshi, K. (2011). International financial institutions and discursive institutional change: implications for corporate social responsibility in developing economies. Journal of Change Management, 11(1), 111-128.
- Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11-24.
- Broshniv-Osadska UTC. (2018). Stratehiia rozvytku Broshniv-Osadskoy OTH na period do 2028 r. [Strategy of Broshniv-Osadska UTC Development 2028]. (In Ukrainian).
- Crawford, D., & Scaletta, T. (2005). The Balanced Scorecard and Corporate Social Responsibility: Aligning Values for Profit. GreenBiz.
- Danko, Y. I., Medvid, V. Y., Koblianska, I. I., Kornietskyy, O. V., & Reznik, N. P. (2020). Territorial government reform in Ukraine: problem aspects of strategic management. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 1376-1382.
- Decentralization Initiative Press Center. (2019). Finansova detsentralizatsiya: predstavnyky predstavyly pro rezultaty 2018 roku ta perspektyvy 2019 roku [Financial decentralization: Experts talk about 2018 results and 2019 prospects]. (In Ukrainian).
- Gal, G., Akisik, O., & Wooldridge, W. (2018). Sustainability and Social Responsibility: Regulation and Reporting. In Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application (pp. 225-239). Singapore: Springer Nature.
- Gardberg, N., & Fombrun, C. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 329-346.
- Graafland, J. (2018). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Put Reputation at Risk by Inviting Activist Targeting? An Empirical Test among European SMEs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 1-13.
- Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. J. (2016). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Reviewof Architectures. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 193-221.
- Holovatyi, M. (2015). The state and society: the conceptual foundations and social interaction in the context of formation and functioning of states. Economic Annals, XXI(9-10), 4-8. (In Ukrainian).
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2014). GRI G4 Guidelines and ISO 26000:2010 How to use the GRI G4 Guidelines and ISO 26000 in conjunction.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015a). Conceptual Framework of Social Responsibility Accounting.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2015b). ISO 26000 and the International Integrated Reporting Framework Briefing Summary.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018a). Discovering ISO 26000.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018b). ISO 26000 – Social Responsibility.
- Irtyshcheva, I., Stroyko, T., & Stegney, M. (2015). Factors and peculiarities of rural areas sustainable development under global challenges. Actual Problems of Economics, 1(163), 302-310. (In Ukrainian).
- Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study International. Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 32-61.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001a). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001b). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87-104.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2013). Multinationals, CSR and partnerships in Central African conflict countries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 43-54.
- Komarova, K. V., & Kovalchuk, N. V. (2016). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist yak skladova stratehii rozvytku biznesu na pidpryiemstvakh Ukrainy [Social responsibility as a component of business development strategy at Ukrainian enterprises]. Innovatsiina ekonomika – Innovative economy, 5-6, 25-30. (In Ukrainian).
- Lund-Thomsen, P., & Nadvi, K. (2010). Global value chains, local collective action and corporate social responsibility: a review of empirical evidence. Business, Strategy and the Environment, 19, 1-13.
- Maksymiv, Yu. (2016). Reporting as an important tool in ensuring interaction between stakeholders. Actual Problems of Economics, 4(178), 304-310. (In Ukrainian).
- Malyarets, L. M., & Shterever, A. V. (2008). Zbalansovana systema pokaznykiv v otsintsi diialnosti pidpryiemstva [A balanced system of indicators in the evaluation of the activity of the enterprise]. Kharkiv: KNEU. (In Ukrainian).
- Mantzari, E., Reklitis, P., Trivellas, P., Mantzaris, I., & Reklitis, D. (2018). Employee perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility activities and work-related attitudes: the case of a Greek management services organization. In G. Gal, O. Akisik, & W. Wooldridge (Eds.), Sustainability and Social Responsibility: Regulation and Reporting (pp. 225-240). Singapore: Springer.
- Melo, T., & Garrido-Morgado, A. (2012). Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 11-31.
- Neely, A., Marr, B., Roos, G., Pike, S., & Gupta, O. (2003). Towards the Third Generation of Performance Measurement. Controlling, 15(3-4), 129-135.
- Panukhnyk, O., Popadynets, N., & Fedotova, Y. (2019). Analysis and modeling of factor determinants of food provision at consumer market of Ukraine. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 5(SI), 215-226.
- Pérez-Cornejo, C., Quevedo-Puente, E., & Delgado-García, J. B. (2019). Reporting as a booster of the corporate social performance effect on corporate reputation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3).
- Popadynets, N. Shults, S., & Barna, M. (2017). Differences in consumer buying behavior in consumer markets of the EU member states and Ukraine. Economic Annals, XXI, 166(7-8), 26-30.
- Pylypenko, A. A. (2010). Zbalansovana systema pokaznykiv u systemi stratehichnoho upravlinnia rozvytkom intehrovanykh struktur biznesu [Balanced Scorecard in the Strategic Management Development System for Integrated Business Structures]. Problemy ekonomiky – Problems of Economy, 2, 47-55. (In Ukrainian).
- Pylypiv, N. I., & Piatnychuk, І. D. (2018). Essential strategic management accounting tools used for making investment decisions at enterprises in EU. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 5(3-4), 50-56.
- Pylypiv, N. I., Maksymiv, Yu. V., & Piatnychuk, І. D. (2018). Сonceptual approach to construction of accounting and information provision of social responsibility for business enterprises through the prism of the business partnership system. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(27), 201-211.
- Pylypiv, N. I., Piatnychuk, I. D., & Sologub, S. I. (2018). Concept of ATC social responsibility in the context of sustainable development. Bulletin of the Carpathian University. Economy, XІІІ, 36-42. (In Ukrainian).
- Romanenko, Y. О., & Chaplay, І. V. (2016). Systema marketynhovykh komunikatsii v mekhanizmakh derzhavnoho upravlinnia [The system of marketing communications in the mechanisms of public governance]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky – Actual Problems of Economics, 4, 69-78. (In Ukrainian).
- Stehnei, M., Irtyshcheva, I., Boiko, Y., & Khaustova, K. (2019). Strategic Priorities and Effectiveness of the Implementation of the State Policy for Sustainable Agricultural Development in Ukraine. Public Policy and Administration, 2(18), 194-208.
- Titisari, K. H., Moeljadi, M., Ratnawati, K., & Indrawati, N. K. (2019). The roles of cost of capital, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility in improving firm value: evidence from Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(4), 28-36.
- Voznyak, H. V. (2015). Biudzhetna polityka v umovakh transformatsii finansovykh osnov mistsevoho samovriaduvannia v Ukraini [Budgetary policy in terms of local self-government financial foundations transformation in Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi chasopys – Economic Annals, XXI(5-6), 82-85. (In Ukrainian).
- Yakubiv, V. M. (2015). Accounting and analytical methods of diagnostics improvement for enterprises’ organizational development. Ekonomichnyi chasopys – Economic Annals, XXI, 3-4(1), 68-71.