Rankings in the higher education competitiveness management system
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.27
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #4, pp. 325-339
- Cited by
- 1014 Views
-
279 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The modern approaches towards higher education systems management often tend to focus on separate universities’ performance, lacking the systemic view of the overall higher education systems’ competitiveness. Thus, the policymakers often fail in tailoring the higher education strategies to the mission of higher education in contemporary society.
The article focuses on providing a systemic insight into the global competitive positioning of the national higher education systems. Based on the suggested ranking methodology, the authors perform the evaluation and ranking of 94 higher education systems, highlighting the limitations of this method, and the cluster analysis, identifying 3 types of their competitive positioning: leaders, followers, and underperformers. Based on Pearson coefficients of skewness and kurtosis calculation, the article shows that globally the inequalities in terms of higher education enrolment rate are decreasing, while those of R&D institutions quality and university-industry collaboration in research remain unchanged. Therefore, upgrading higher education quality assurance systems becomes the main strategic priority for the developing countries in terms of ensuring their higher education systems’ competitiveness. Given the levelling of higher education attainment and its quality worldwide, the authors anticipate further specialization of the universities and broadening of their role within the national innovation system. The article shows that the more comprehensive the approach for evaluating the higher education systems performance – the better the policymakers may benefit in terms of higher education strategic management.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, H52
-
References36
-
Tables5
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Graphs of means for clusters 1-8
- Figure 2. Higher education systems’ skewness (152 countries, 4 indicators characterizing the national higher education systems) over the last decade, 2018–2021 – linear trend line estimation
- Figure 3. Scatterplot: higher education systems’ competitiveness index vs. Global Innovation Index (2017)
-
- Table 1. The national higher education systems’ competitiveness index
- Table 2. Competitive positioning of the national higher education systems
- Table 3. Higher education systems’ Pearson coefficients of skewness and kurtosis (values) (152 countries, 4 indicators characterizing the national higher education systems), 2007–2017
- Table A1. Data used for calculations of Higher Education Systems’ Ranking and cluster analysis (standardized)
- Table B1. Indicators base
-
- Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2010). Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution. UNESCO Pub.
- Bastedo, M., Altbach, P., & Gumport, P. (2016). American Higher Education in the 21st century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges (4th ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Clark, B. R. (1986). The higher education system: academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. (2017). The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
- Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO. (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva:
- Dolton, P., Marcenaro-Gutiérrez, O., & Stil, A. (2014). The efficiency index: which education systems deliver the best value for money? Project Report. GEMS Education Solutions, London.
- Ederer, P., Schuller, P., & Willms, S. (2008). University Systems Ranking: Citizens and Society in the Age of the Knowledge. Brussels: Lisbon Council.
- Edgerton, J. (2012). Education and the Quality of Life. In J. Edgerton, L. Roberts & S. von Below (Eds.), Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research (pp. 265-296). Springer.
- Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. New York: Routledge.
- Etzkowitz, H., & Leydersdorf, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
- Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The Global Creativity Index 2015. Toronto: Martin Prosperity Institute, University of Toronto.
- Hanushek, E., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Ilnitsky, D. (2016). Hlobalna konkurentsiia u naukovo-osvitnomu prostori [Global competition in the scientific and educational space]. Kyiv: KNEU. (In Ukrainian).
- INSEAD. (2018). Global Talent Competitiveness Index: Talent Diversity and Competitiveness will fuel the future of work. Fontainebleau, France.
- Jahanian, F. (2018). 4 ways universities are driving innovation. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting.
- Lanvin, B., & Evans, P. (2016). Global Talent Competitiveness Index 2017: Talent and Technology. INSEAD, ADECCO, HCLI.
- Maret, P. D., & Salmi, J. (2018). World-Class Universities in a Post-Truth World.
- Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1-9.
- Moravec, J. W. (2008). Moving beyond Education 2.0. Education Futures.
- Morphew, C. C., Fumasoli, T., & Stensaker, B. (2018). Changing missions? How the strategic plans of research-intensive universities in Northern Europe and North America balance competing identities. Studies in Higher Education, 6(43), 1074-1088.
- Mulé, G. (2016). EFQM in the Higher Education (EFQM Forum 2016). Milan: EFQM.
- NORC at the University of Chicago. (2018). Most Americans look to research universities for innovation leadership, finds Polsky Center. UChicagoNews.
- Pavlenko, A. F. Antoniuk, L. L., Vasylkova, N. V., Ilnytskyi, D. O. et al. (2014). Doslidnytski universytety: svitovyi dosvid ta perspektyvy rozvytku v Ukraini: monohrafiia [Research universities: international experience and development perspectives in Ukraine: monograph]. KNEU. (In Ukrainian).
- QS TopUniversities. (2018). QS Higher Education System Strength Ranking.
- Romanovsky, O. (2012). Research Entrepreneurial Universities of the USA as an Accelerator of the Economic Development of the Country. ESSE “Effective Economy”, 11.
- SCImago Lab. (2017). SCImago Journal and Country Rank: World Report.
- Stonkienė, M., Matkevičienė, R., & Vaiginienė, E. (2016). Evaluation Of The National Higher Education System’s Competitiveness: Theoretical Model. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 26(2), 116-131.
- Teichler, U. (2006). Changing Structures of the Higher Education Systems: The Increasing Complexity of Underlying Forces. Higher Education Policy, 19, 447-461.
- Trow, M. (1974). Problems in the Transition from Elite to Mass Higher Education. In Policies for Higher Education, Conference on Future Structures of Post-Secondary Education (pp. 55-101). Paris 26th-29th June, 1973. Paris: OECD.
- UNESCO. (n.d.). Education Indicators. Education expenditure per student by level of education and source of funding (data for 2017). UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- WEF. (2017a). The Global Competitiveness Index dataset 2007–2017.
- WEF. (2017b). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
- Williams, R., & Leahy, A. (2018). U21 Ranking of National Higher Education Systems. Birmingham: Universitas 21, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (University of Melbourne).
- Williams, R., Leahy, A., & Jensen, P. (2017). U21 Ranking of National Higher Education Systems. Birmingham: Universitas 21, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (University of Melbourne).
- World Bank. (2010). Learning for All: Investing in People’s Knowledge and Skills to Promote Development. World Bank Education Strategy 2020.
- Zhilyaev, I. B., Kovtunets, V., & Syomkin, M. (2015). Higher education in Ukraine: state and problems. Kyiv: Research Institute of Informatics and Law of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Higher Education of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine.